Designing GIS learning materials for K–12 teachers

References

• Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction (pp. 445–456). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Akinyemi, F. O. (2015). Technology use in Rwandan secondary schools: An assessment of teachers’ attitudes towards geographic information systems (GIS). International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25, 20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibrandi, M., & Palmer-Moloney, J. (2001). Making a place for technology in teacher education with Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1, 483–500.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, E. O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E., & Frick, T. (2008). User-centered design and development. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 1, 659–670.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R. (2005). Internet-based GIS mapping in support of K–12 education. The Professional Geographer, 57, 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., & Bednarz, S. W. (2003). Lessons learned from reviewing research in GIS education. Journal of Geography, 102, 231–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., Palmer, A. M., & Kerski, J. J. (2009). A national survey to examine teacher professional development and implementation of desktop GIS. Journal of Geography, 108, 174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S. W. (2004). Geographic information systems: A tool to support geography and environmental education? GeoJournal, 60, 191–199.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S. W., & Schee, J. V. D. (2006). Europe and the United States: The implementation of geographic information systems in secondary education in two contexts. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15, 191–205.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S. (2001). Designing online courses: User-centered practices. Computers and Composition, 18, 329–346.
   Google Scholar
• Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Wopereis, I. G. J. H. (2003). Pedagogy of training in information and communications technology for teachers and beyond. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12, 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., Chin, G., Rosson, M. B., & Neale, D. C. (2000). The development of cooperation: Five years of participatory design in the virtual school. In D. Boyarski & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 239–251). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Demirci, A. (2008). Evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of GIS-based application in secondary school geography lessons. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K–12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106, 217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41, 319–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esri. (2014a). ArcGIS Explorer Online. Retrieved from http://explorer.arcgis.com
   Google Scholar
• Esri. (2014b). Industries. Retrieved from http://www.esri.com/industries
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. (2003). Teacher professional development through curriculum development: Teachers’ experiences in the field trialling of on-line curriculum materials. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12, 329–343.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, J. J. (2002). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28, 300–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., & Hoe-Lian, G. (2014). ‘We want to hear your voice’: Power relations in participatory design. In S. Latifi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on information technology: New generations (pp. 561–566). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, P. (2002). Challenges for design of computer-based learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 461–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., & Tobón, C. (2003). Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centred design approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17, 577–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, P., & Semple, H. (2012). Integrating online GIS into the K–12 curricula: Lessons from the development of a collaborative GIS in Michigan. Journal of Geography, 111, 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. E. (2014). Promoting teacher adoption of GIS using teacher-centered and teacher-friendly design. Journal of Geography, 113, 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 277–302.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A. (2012). Literacy teachers’ perceptions of professional development that increases integration of technology into literacy instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21, 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102, 128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerski, J. J. (2008). Spatial inquiry using web-mapping tools. Retrieved from http://www.josephkerski.com/spatial_inquiry_using_web_mapping_tools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kerski, J. J., Demirci, A., & Milson, A. J. (2013). The global landscape of GIS in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 112, 232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Teachers’ perspective on innovations: Implications for educational design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 985–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., Honda, T., & Yang, M. (2010). A study of the role of user-centered design methods in design team projects. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 303–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Zhu, X. (2008). Designing a structured and interactive learning environment based on GIS for secondary geography education. Journal of Geography, 107, 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, D. J. (1991). An overview and definition of GIS. Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications, 1, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Marty, P. F., Mendenhall, A., Douglas, I., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., Kazmer, M. M., … Schellinger, J. (2013). The iterative design of a mobile learning application to support scientific inquiry. Journal of Learning Design, 6(2), 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Geographic Education. (1994). Geography for life: National geography standards. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K–12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. C. (2007). Google Earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 106, 145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakshit, R., & Ogneva-Himmelberger, Y. (2008). Application of virtual globes in education. Geography Compass, 2, 1995–2010.
   Google Scholar
• Riihelä, J., & Mäki, S. (2015). Designing and implementing an online GIS tool for schools: The Finnish case of the PaikkaOppi project. Journal of Geography, 114, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulston, S. (2013). GIS in Northern Ireland secondary schools: Mapping where we are now. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design: Beyond human–computer interaction (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Siozos, P., Palaigeorgiou, G., Triantafyllakos, G., & Despotakis, T. (2009). Computer based testing using ‘digital ink’: Participatory design of a Tablet PC based assessment application for secondary education. Computers & Education, 52, 811–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, R. F. (1992). Mapware: Educational applications of geographic information systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Labor. (2004). Geospatial. Retrieved from http://www.doleta.gov/BRG/Indprof/Geospatial.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. M. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the Internet. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 447–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Chen, C. (2013). GIS education in Taiwanese senior high schools: A national survey among geography teachers. Journal of Geography, 112, 75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J., & Wright, K. E. (2000). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: The new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40(2), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zemke, R., & Rossett, A. (2002). A hard look at ISD. Training, 39(2), 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 482–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar