Facebook for supervision? Research education shaped by the structural properties of a social media space

References

• Aburezeq, I. M., & Ishtaiwa, F. F. (2013). The impact of WhatsApp on interaction in an Arabic language teaching course. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 6, 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Chaka, C., Mphahlele, M. L., & Mann, C. C. (2015). The structure and features of the SMS language used in the written work of Communication English I students at a university in South Africa. Reading & Writing, 6(1), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, E. K. (2010). Using blogging to enhance the initiation of students into academic research. Computers & Education, 55, 798–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 13, 127–149.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1985). How to supervise a PhD. Vestes, 28(2), 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• De Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo, M., Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2014). Multimodal social semiotics: Writing in online contexts. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 251–266). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J. (2013, June). What to do about bad language on the Internet. Paper presented at the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson Consumerlab. (2011). From apps to everyday situations. Retrieved from http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2011/silicon_valley_brochure_letter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2009). Developing research capacity in the social sciences: A professionality based model. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1, 134–149.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, N., & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouws, S., Metzler, D., Cai, C., & Hovy, E. (2011, June). Contextual bearing on linguistic variation in social media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Habuchi, I. (2005). Accelerating reflexivity. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 165–182). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the ‘spiral of silence’. Pew Report. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T., & LeBaron, C. (2002). Learner articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 249–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le, Q. (2012). E-Portfolio for enhancing graduate research supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 20, 54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 487–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content anaIysis. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 266–269). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ngaleka, A., & Uys, W. (2013, June). M-learning with whatsapp: A conversation analysis. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on e-Learning, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., Cook, J., & Bachmair, B. (2010). Appropriation of mobile cultural resources for learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., & Redondo, A. (2012). E-mentoring and educational research capacity development: A conceptual perspective. In S. Fletcher & C. Mullen (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mentoring and coaching in education (pp. 459–477). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 754–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, J. (2015). Engagement in structured social space: An investigation of teachers’ online peer-to-peer interaction. Learning, Media and Technology. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1102743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surry, D. W., & Baker, F. W. (2015). The co-dependent relationship of technology and communities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussex, R. (2008). Technological options in supervising remote research students. Higher Education, 55, 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1, 30. Retrieved from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003-paper.html.
   Google Scholar
• Timmis, S. (2012). Constant companions: Instant messaging conversations as sustainable supportive study structures amongst undergraduate peers. Computers & Education, 59, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikneswaran, T., & Krish, P. (2015). Utilising social networking sites to improve writing: A case study with Chinese students in Malaysia. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25, 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar