Educational affordances and learning design in music software development

References

• Beckstead, D. (2001). Will technology transform music education? Music Educators Journal, 87(6), 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, A. P., Bowles, E. A., Broido, A., Davis, C. W., Henney, T. H., Imig, W., Sand, O., Shetler, D. J., & Whitney, M. C. (1968). Impact and potential of technology. In R. Choate (Ed.), Documentary report of the Tanglewood Symposium. Washington, DC: Music Educators National Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R. (2012). Experience design and interactive software in music education research. Visions of Research in Music Education, 20. Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/vrme~/
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R. (2014). Music technology and education: Amplifying musicality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, T. (2010). Using computers to teach listening skills: An intervention study. In J. Kerchner (Ed.), 18th Music in Schools and Teacher Education Seminar, International Society for Music Education (pp. 13–17). Shenyang, China: International Society for Music Education.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2004). Grounded theory. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice (pp. 496–521). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-W. J. (2012). A pilot study mapping students’ composing strategies: Implications for teaching computer-assisted composition. Research Studies in Music Education, 34, 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-W. J. (2015). Mobile learning: Using application Auralbook to learn aural skills. International Journal of Music Education, 33, 244–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, J. (2014). Theory and practice of technology-based music instruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, L. V., Vicari, R. M., & Pimenta, M. S. (2001). Some heuristics for the development of music education software: First steps towards a methodology. In Proceedings of the 8th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music [CD-ROM]. Niterói, Brazil: Instituto Doris Ferraz de Aragon.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. & Breeze, N. (2005). Music composition lessons: The multimodal affordances of technology. Educational Review, 57, 415–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. & Breeze, N. (2007). The sub-culture of music and ICT in the classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Greher, G. R. (2004). Multimedia in the classroom: Tapping into an adolescent’s cultural literacy. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 2(2), 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. V. & O’Donnell, J. (2010). Calibrating a bowing checker for violin students. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 3, 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. (2011). The practice of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council (2003). Arts education Key Learning Area: Music curriculum guide (Primary 1–Secondary 3). Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council & Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (2007). Music curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, P. R. (2010). Exploring contexts for development: Secondary music students’ computer-mediated composing. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 3, 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Can we support CCSL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 7–47). Heerlen: Open Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Lenberg, H. (2010). Music software for the masses. Master’s thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.nada.kth.se/utbildning/grukth/exjobb/rapportlistor/2010/sammanf10/lenberg_henrik.html
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Sphere Books.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Music Merchants. (2012). The NAMM global report. Retrieved from http://www.namm.org/library/global-report
   Google Scholar
• Ng, K. (2008). Technology-enhanced learning for music with i-Maestro framework and tools. In S. Dunn, S. Keene, G. Mallen, & J. Bowen (Eds.), Proceedings of the EVA 2008 London International Conference on Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (pp. 177–187). London: British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance [Biology and knowledge]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, J. (2010). A survey of ICT usage across English secondary schools. Music Education Research, 12, 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. (2011). Contemplating a constructivist stance for active learning within music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 112, 191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, Vol. 20 (pp. 449–460). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, E. S. (2012). Hybrid spaces and hyphenated musicians: Secondary students’ musical engagement in a songwriting and technology course. Music Education Research, 14, 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C. J. (2009). Musical exploration using ICT in the middle and secondary school classroom. International Journal of Music Education, 27, 154–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, S., Greenwood, J., & Davis, N. (2011). Teachers’ use of digital technology in secondary music education: Illustrations of changing classrooms. British Journal of Music Education, 28, 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, E. (2013). AURALBOOK (Version 2.0) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from: https://appsto.re/hk/J9DbH.i
   Google Scholar