Hypervideo for educational purposes: a literature review on a multifaceted technological tool

References

• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• *Azmy, N. (2013). Interaction effects of hypervideo navigation variables in college students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22, 113–146.
   Google Scholar
• *Baepler, P., & Reynolds, T. (2014). The digital manifesto: Engaging student writers with digital video assignments. Computers & Composition, 34, 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaiuti, G. (2010). Didattica attiva con i video digitali. Metodi, tecnologie, strumenti per apprendere in classe in Rete [Active instruction with digital videos. Methods, technologies, tools to learn in the classroom on the Internet]. Trento: Erickson.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, A., Nguyen, A.-T., & Aprea, C. (2014). Video interattivo. In G. P. Quaglino (Ed.), Formazione. I metodi [Hypervideo. Training. The methods] (pp. 959–989). Milan: Raffaello Cortina.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, A., Nguyen, A. T., & Aprea, C. (2016). Teaching and learning with hypervideo in vocational education and training. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 25, 5–35.
   Google Scholar
• *Cattaneo, A., Nguyen, A.-T., Sauli, F., & Aprea, C. (2015). Scuolavisione: Teaching and learning with hypervideo in the Swiss vocational system. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(2), 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chambel, T., Zahn, C., & Finke, M. (2006). Hypervideo and cognition: Designing video-based hypermedia for individual learning and collaborative knowledge building. In E. Alkalifa (Ed.), Cognitively informed systems: Utilizing practical approaches to enrich information presentation and transfer (pp. 26–49). Hershey, PA and London: IGI Global and Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• *Chen, Y.-T. (2012). A study of implementing and evaluating an interactive video on demand. New Educational Review, 28, 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• *Cherrett, T., Wills, G., Price, J., Maynard, S., & Dror, I. E. (2009). Making training more cognitively effective: Making videos interactive. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 1124–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 66–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Debevc, M., Šafarič, R., & Golob, M. (2008). Hypervideo application on an experimental control system as an approach to education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 16, 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, R., Salas, E., Pavlas, D., & Rosen, M. A. (2013). Using instructional features to enhance demonstration-based training in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 219–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Guy, R., Byrne, B., & Rich, P. (2014). Supporting physiology learning: The development of interactive concept-based video clips. Advances in Physiology Education, 38, 96–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2006). Non-optimal uses of video in the classroom. Learning Media and Technology, 31, 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., Schmeck, A., & Opfermann, M. (2013). Static and dynamic visual representations. Individual differences in processing. In G. Schraw, M. T. McCrudden, & D. Robinson (Eds.), Learning through visual displays (pp. 133–163). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• *Hulsman, R. L., & van der Vloodt, J. (2015). Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students’ communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity. Patient Education and Counseling, 98, 356–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H., Waxman, H., Wu, J.-Y., Michko, G., & Lin, G. (2013). Revisit the effect of teaching and learning with technology. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatis, C., Charuhas, J., & Banvard, R. (1990). Hypervideo. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive process in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meixner, B., Matusik, K., Grill, C., & Kosch, H. (2014). Towards an easy to use authoring tool for interactive non-linear video. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 70, 1251–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Merkt, M., & Schwan, S. (2014a). How does interactivity in videos affect task performance? Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 172–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Merkt, M., & Schwan, S. (2014b). Training the use of interactive videos: Effects on mastering different tasks. Instructional Science, 42, 421–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21, 687–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mu, X. (2010). Towards effective video annotation: An approach to automatically link notes with video content. Computers & Education, 55, 1752–1763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mujacic, S., Debevc, M., Kosec, P., Bloice, M., & Holzinger, A. (2012). Modeling, design, development and evaluation of a hypervideo presentation for digital systems teaching and learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 58, 435–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. (1965). A file structure for the complex, the changing, and the indeterminate. In Proceedings of the 20th national conference of the Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 84–100). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterization of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 781–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, P., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 52–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Pavlas, D., Jensen, R., Fu, D., & Lampton, D. (2010). Demonstration-based training: A review of instructional features. Human Factors, 52, 596–609. doi:10.1177/0018720810381071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Senchina, D. D. (2011). Video laboratories for the teaching and learning of professional ethics in exercise physiology curricula. Advances in Physiology Education, 35, 264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stahl, E., Finke, M., & Zahn, C. (2006). Knowledge acquisition by hypervideo design: An instructional program for university courses. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 285–302.
   Google Scholar
• *Stahl, E., Zahn, C., Schwan, S., & Finke, M. (2006). Knowledge acquisition by designing hypervideos: Different roles of writing during courses of ‘new’ media production. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten, & C. M. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and digital media (pp. 77–88). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• *Tiellet, C. A. B., Pereira, A. G., Reategui, E. B., Lima, J. V., & Chambel, T. (2010, June). Design and evaluation of a hypervideo environment to support veterinary surgery learning. Paper presented at Hypertext2010, the 21st ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, T., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 728–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., Bauer Morrison, J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Viel, C. C., Rodrigues, K. R. H., Melo, E. L., Bueno, R., Pimentel, M. G. C., & Teixeira, C. A. C. (2014). Interaction with a problem solving multi video lecture: Observing students from distance and traditional learning courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9, 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• *Vural, Ö. F. (2013). The impact of a question-embedded video-based learning tool on e-learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 1315–1323.
   Google Scholar
• *Wang, L. (2008). Developing and evaluating an interactive multimedia instructional tool: Learning outcomes and user experiences of optometry students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17, 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• *Yeh, S.-W., & Lehman, J. D. (2001). Effects of learner control and learning strategies on English as a foreign language (EFL) learning from interactive hypermedia lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• *Zahn, C., Barquero, B., & Schwan, S. (2004). Learning with hyperlinked videos – Design criteria and efficient strategies for using audiovisual hypermedia. Learning and Instruction, 14, 275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn, C., Hesse, F. W., Finke, M., Pea, R., Mills, M., & Rosen, J. (2005, January). Advanced video technologies to support collaborative learning in school education and beyond. Paper presented at the International CSCL-05 Conference, Taipei.
   Google Scholar
• *Zahn, C., Krauskopf, K., Hesse, F. W., & Pea, R. (2010). Digital video tools in the classroom: How to support meaningful collaboration and critical advanced thinking of students? In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 503–523). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• *Zahn, C., Krauskopf, K., Hesse, F. W., & Pea, R. (2012). How to improve collaborative learning with video tools in the classroom? Social vs. cognitive guidance for student teams. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 259–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zahn, C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., & Rosen, J. (2010). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for complex collaborative design processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 403–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zahn, C., Schwan, S., & Barquero, B. (2002). Authoring hypervideos: Design for learning and learning by design. In R. Bromme & E. Stahl (Eds.), Writing hypertext and learning. Conceptual and empirical approaches (pp. 153–176). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• *Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43, 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar