1,479
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Use of Facebook, students’ intrinsic motivation to study writing, writing self-efficacy and writing performance

ORCID Icon
Pages 21-36 | Received 12 May 2017, Accepted 08 Apr 2018, Published online: 17 Dec 2018

References

  • Alberth. (2013). Technology-enhanced teaching: A revolutionary approach to teaching English as a foreign language. TEFLIN, 24, 1–13.
  • Alberth. (in press). Indonesian high school student motivational orientations for learning English as a foreign language: Some preliminary findings. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. Advanced online publication. Retrieved from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/
  • Alias, N., Siraj, S., Azman, M. K., Daud, M., & Hussin, Z. (2013). Effectiveness of Facebook based learning to enhance creativity among Islamic studies students by employing Isman Instructional Design Model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 60–67.
  • Bandura, A. J. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bani-Hani, N. A., Mahmoud, A., Al-Sobh, A., Abdel-Rahman, H., & Abu-Melhim. (2014). Utilizing Facebook groups in teaching Writing: Jordanian EFL students’ perceptions and attitudes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 27–34.
  • Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489–520.
  • Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 6, 17–28.
  • Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2011). Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29, 24–43.
  • Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 25–38.
  • Bugeja, M. J. (2006). Facing the Facebook. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(21), 1–4.
  • Chartrand, R. (2012). Social networking for language learners: Creating meaningful output with Web 2.0 tools. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 4, 97–101.
  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63, 97–107.
  • Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
  • Grosseck, G., Bran, R., & Tiru, L. (2011). Dear teacher, what should I write on my wall? A case study on academic uses of Facebook. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1425–1430.
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101.
  • Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13, 179–187.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237–1245.
  • Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 173–203.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Prentice-Hall International.
  • Lantz-Andersson, A., Vigmo, S., & Bowen, R. (2013). Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 293–312.
  • Lepper, M. R., & Corpus, J. H. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196.
  • Lin, V., Kang, Y.-C., Liu, G.-Z., & Lin, W. (2016). Participants’ experiences and interactions on Facebook group in an EFL course in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 99–109.
  • Lingwood, R. (2012). Internet use by Jordanian English major students and their perception of internet English. English Linguistics Research, 1, 50–59.
  • Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2012). A tale of tweets: Analyzing microblogging among language learners. System, 40, 48–63.
  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistics environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). ‘Facebook’, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 141–155.
  • Mangkulo, H. A. (2010). Facebook for sekolahan. Jakarta: P.T. Elex Media Komputindo.
  • Martinez, C. T., Kock, N., & Cass, J. (2011). Pain and pleasure in short essay writing: Factors predicting university students’ writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy. Journal of Adoloscent & Adult Literacy, 54, 351–360.
  • McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48–58.
  • McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 729–740.
  • Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28, 345–368.
  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57, 417–442.
  • Nelson, B., & Ketelhut, D. (2008). Exploring embedded guidance and self-efficacy in educational multi-user virtual environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 413–427.
  • Ochoa, C., Cabrera, P., Quinonez, A., Castillo, L., & Gonzalez, P. (2016). The effect of communicative activities on EFL learners’ motivation: A case of students in the Amazon region of Ecuador. Colombian Applied Lingustics Journal, 18(2), 39–48.
  • Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238.
  • Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 90, 715–729.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
  • Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60–73.
  • Rios, J. A., & Campos, J. L. E. (2015). The role of Facebook in foreign language learning. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 23, 253–262.
  • Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Self-Determination Theory. (n.d.). Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/
  • Shih, R. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 829–845.
  • Shukor, S. S. (2014). Effects of Facebook collaborative writing groups on ESL undergraduates’ writing performance. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(2), 89–99.
  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & G. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practices in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tan, C., Ang, R., Klassen, R., Yeo, L., Wong, I., & Heun, V. (2008). Correlates of academic procrastination and students’ grade goals. Current Psychology, 27, 135–144.
  • Terantino, J. (Ed.). (2013). Facebook comparison research: Faculty and student perceptions of social media for foreign language courses. In B. Zou, M. Xing, Y. Wang, M. Sun, & C. H. Xiang (Eds.), Computer-assisted foreign language teaching and learning: Technological advances (pp. 91-103). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • VanDoorn, G., & Eklund, A. A. (2013). Face to Facebook: Social media and the learning and teaching potential of symmetrical, synchronous communication. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10, 1–14.
  • Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29, 412–430.
  • Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54, 1202–1211.
  • Wu, S. (2016). A study on the English teaching model in the Facebook environment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6, 1791–1796.
  • Wu, X. (2003). Intrinsic motivation and young language learners: The impact of the classroom environment. System, 31, 501–517.
  • Yang, S.-C., & Chen, Y.-J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 860–879.
  • Yu, L.-T. (2014). A case study of using Facebook in an EFL English writing class: The perspective of a writing teacher. JALT CALL Journal, 10, 189–202.
  • Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.