References
- Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–28.
- Bate, F. (2010). A bridge too far? Explaining beginning teachers’ use of ICT in Australian schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 1042–1061.
- Batorowicz, B., Missiuna, C. A., & Pollock, N. A. (2012). Technology supporting written productivity in children with learning disabilities: A critical review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 211–224.
- Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 519–546.
- Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37, 45–63.
- Bouck, E. C., (2016). A national snapshot of assistive technology for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31, 4–13. doi: 10.1177/0162643416633330
- Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klinger, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Culp, K. M., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2005). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 279–307.
- Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919.
- Davies, R. S., & West, R. E. (2014). Technology integration in schools. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 841–853). New York, NY: Springer.
- Demirci, A. (2009). How do teachers approach new technologies: Geography teachers’ attitudes towards Geographic Information Systems (GIS). European Journal of Educational Studies, 1, 43–53.
- Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51, 187–199.
- Edyburn, D. L. (2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1–24.
- Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59, 423–435.
- Geertsema, S., Hyman, C., & van Deventer, C. (2011). Short message service (SMS) language and written language skills: Educators’ perspectives. South African Journal of Education, 31, 475–487.
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
- Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching middle school students: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27, 1015–1042. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
- Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES-2010-040). National Center of Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf
- Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16, 21–46.
- Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49, 943–956.
- Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity Theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to Information and Communication Technologies. Computers & Education, 53, 436–444.
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Nutt, J. (2010). Professional educators and the evolving role of ICT in schools. Perspective report. Retrieved from http://www.ictliteracy.info/rf.pdf/ICTinSchools.pdf
- Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. (1989). Linking and learning: A new course for education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection, OTA-HER-616. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 145–161.
- Powell, D., & Dixon, M. (2011). Does SMS text messaging help or harm adults’ knowledge of standard spelling? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 58–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00403.x
- Regan, K., Berkeley, S., Hughes, M., Kirby, S. (2014). Effects of computer-assisted instruction for struggling elementary readers with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 48, 106–119. doi:10.1177/0022466913497261
- Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 297–310.
- Ten Brummelhuis, A. C. A. (1995). Models of educational change: The introduction of computers in Dutch secondary education ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Enhancing education through technology. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2001. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg34.html
- U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. National Education Technology Plan 2010. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Technology.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. National Education Technology Plan 2016. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Technology.
- Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 253–271.
- Vannest, K. J., Soars, D. A., Harrison, J. R., Brown, L., & Parker, R. I. (2010). Changing teacher time. Preventing School Failure, 54, 86–98. doi:10.1080/10459880903217739
- Ward, L. (2003, November–December). Teacher practice and the integration of ICT: Why aren’t our secondary teachers using computers in their classrooms? Paper presented at NZARE/AARE 2003, Auckland. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu/03pap/war03165.pdf
- Warschauer, M. (2007). Technology and writing. In C. Davidson & J. Cummins (Eds.), The international handbook of English language teaching (pp. 907–912). Norwell, MA: Springer.
- Wells, J., & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005 (NCES 2007-020). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007020.pdf
- Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovation. Teachers College Record, 104, 482–515.