9,592
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Technological and pedagogical support for pre-service teachers’ lesson planning

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 115-128 | Received 04 May 2017, Accepted 08 Nov 2018, Published online: 10 Feb 2019

References

  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52, 154–168.
  • Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education, 54, 759–766.
  • Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 348–379.
  • Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009). The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers’ science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 199–218.
  • Britten, J. S., & Cassady, J. C. (2005). The technology integration assessment instrument. Computers in the Schools, 22(3–4), 49–61.
  • Çalik, M., Özsevgeç, T., Ebenezer, J., Artun, H., & Küçük, Z. (2014). Effects of ‘environmental chemistry’ elective course via technology-embedded scientific inquiry model on some variables. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 412–430.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology and Society, 13(4), 63–73. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.4.63
  • Clarebout G., & Elen J. (2006). Tool use in computer-based learning environments: Towards a research framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 389–411.
  • Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60–69.
  • Gerard, L. F., Varma, K., Corliss, S. B., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research, 81, 408–448.
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1960.
  • Han, I., Eom, M., & Shin, W. S. (2013). Multimedia case-based learning to enhance pre-service teachers’ knowledge integration for teaching with technologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 122–129.
  • Harvey, D. M., & Caro, R. (2017). Building TPACK in preservice teachers through explicit course design. TechTrends, 61, 106–114.
  • Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Janssen, N. (2017). Supporting teachers’ technology integration in lesson plans ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
  • Janssen, N., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016). Supporting pre-service teachers in designing technology-infused lesson plans. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 456–467.
  • Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11, 49–59.
  • Kale, U. (2014). Can they plan to teach with Web 2.0? Future teachers’ potential use of the emerging web. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23, 471–489.
  • Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 108–122.
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131–152.
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Specter, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers’ lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 887–900.
  • Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers & Education, 70, 222–232.
  • Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44, 35–58.
  • Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2013). Towards a TPACK-fostering ICT instructional process for teachers: Lessons from the implementation of interactive whiteboard instruction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 233–247.
  • Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20, 434–447.
  • Krauskopf, K., Zahn, C., Hesse, F. W., & Pea, R. D. (2014). Understanding video tools for teaching: Mental models of technology affordances as inhibitors and facilitators of lesson planning in history and language arts. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 230–243.
  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogical practices and ICT use around the world: Findings from an international comparative study. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25, 87–97.
  • Maeng, J., Mulvey, B., Smetana, L., & Bell, R. (2013). Preservice teachers’ TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 838–857.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
  • Mouza, C., & Karchmer-Klein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in the context of case development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48, 127–152.
  • Owston, R. (2007). Contextual factors that sustain innovative pedagogical practice using technology: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 61–77.
  • Pringle, R., Dawson, K., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2015). Integrating science and technology: Using technological pedagogical content knowledge as a framework to study the practices of science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 648–662.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  • Simons, P. R. J. (2002). Digitale didactiek: Hoe (kunnen) academici leren ICT te gebruiken in hun onderwijs [Digital pedagogy: how (can) teachers learn to use ICT in their educational practice]. Inaugural speech. Utrecht: IVLOS, Utrecht University.
  • SLO. (2008). TULE Oriëntatie op jezelf en de wereld. Kerndoel 40 [TULE orientation on the self and the world]. Retrieved from http://tule.slo.nl/OrientatieOpJezelfEnWereld/F-L40.html
  • So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 101–116.
  • van Dijk, A. M., Gijlers, H., & Weinberger, A. (2014). Scripted collaborative drawing in elementary science education. Instructional Science, 42, 353–372.
  • Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacher: Educational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 15–31.
  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 109–121.
  • Walker, A., Recker, M., Ye, L., Robertshaw, M. B., Sellers, L., & Leary, H. (2012). Comparing technology-related teacher professional development designs: A multilevel study of teacher and student impacts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 421–444.