Integrating a space for teacher interaction into an educative curriculum: design principles and teachers’ use of the iPlan tool

References

• Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Interacting with a suite of educative features: Elementary science teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 422–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, A. M., Smith, P. S., Davis, E. A., Marino, J. C., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Justifying predictions: Connecting use of educative curriculum materials to students’ engagement in science argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28, 11–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is: Or might be: The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24, 347–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., & Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 130–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J., Delgado, C., Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Investigating teacher learning supports in high school biology curricular programs to inform the design of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 977–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Edelson, D. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice. Design Brief. Evanston, IL: Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher–tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work – Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 205–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Kulikowich, J. M., & Bravo, M. A. (2015). The effects of educative curriculum materials on teachers’ use of instructional strategies for English language learners in science and on student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C., Reynolds, B., Schuchardt, A., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). How do secondary level biology teachers make sense of using mathematics in design-based lessons about a biological process? In L. Annetta & J. Minogue (Eds.), Connecting science and engineering practices in meaningful ways (pp. 339–372). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A. M., & Kademian, S. M. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46, 293–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Smithey, J., & Petish, D. (2004). Designing an online learning environment for new elementary science teachers: Supports for learning to teach. In ICLS ’04. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on learning sciences (pp. 594–594). Santa Monica, California, June 22–26, 2004. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, B. J., Davis, E. A., & Chan, C. K. (2014). A learning sciences perspective on teacher learning research. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge hand book of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 707–725). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B. W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., et al. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 426–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2007, April). Beginning elementary teachers’ learning through the use of science curriculum materials: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Frumin, K., Dede, C., Fischer, C., Foster, B., Lawrenz, F., Eisenkraft, A., et al. (2018). Adapting to large-scale changes in Advanced Placement Biology, Chemistry, and Physics: The impact of online teacher communities. International Journal of Science Education, 40, 397–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 77, 15–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. (2012). What is a community of practice and how can we support it? In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed., pp. 286–299). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 157–175.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Loper, S., McNeill, K. L., & González-Howard, M. (2017). Multimedia Educative Curriculum Materials (MECMs): Teachers’ choices in using MECMs designed to support scientific argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28, 36–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco‐Bujosa, L. M., McNeill, K. L., González‐Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2017). An exploration of teacher learning from an educative reform‐oriented science curriculum: Case studies of teacher curriculum use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54, 141–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93, 233–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J., Passmore, C., Reiser, B. J., & Michaels, S. (2014). Beyond comparisons of online versus face-to-face PD: Commentary in response to Fishman et al., “Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation”. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 172–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Science teachers learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Committee on Strengthening Science Education through a Teacher Learning Continuum. Board on Science Education and Teacher Advisory Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 352–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform‐based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 283–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, A., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). Modeling scientific processes with mathematics equations enhances student qualitative conceptual understanding and quantitative problem solving. Science Education, 100, 290–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, A. M., Tekkumru‐Kisa, M., Schunn, C. D., Stein, M. K., & Reynolds, B. (2017). How much professional development is needed with educative curriculum materials? It depends upon the intended student learning outcomes. Science Education, 101, 1015–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6, 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Schunn, C., Stein, M. K., & Reynolds, B. (2017). Change in thinking demands for students across the phases of a science task: An exploratory study. Research in Science Education, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zygouris-Coe, V. I., & Swan, B. (2010). Challenges of online teacher professional development communities. In J. O. Lindberg & A. D. Olofsson (Eds.), Online learning communities and teacher professional development: Methods for improved education delivery (pp. 114–133). New York, NY: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar