Teaching technology-mediated collaborative learning for trainee teachers

References

• Banas, J. R., & York, C. S. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ Motivation to use technology and the impact of Authentic learning exercises. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Exploring the New Era of Technology-Infused Education (pp. 121–140). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, R., & Haydn, T. (2006). Trainee teachers’ views on what helps them to use information and communication technology effectively in their subject teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press Bradford Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cesareni, D., Cacciamani, S., & Fujita, N. (2016). Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 9–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 516–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems. Distance Education, 29, 127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & York, C. S. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers: Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of Knowledge through Classroom Interaction (pp. 65–80). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 393–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligorio, M. B., & Sansone, N. (2009). Structure of a blended university course: Applying constructivist principles to blended teaching. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 216–230). Hershey, PA: IGI Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Niglas, K. (2000). Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001544.htm
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor – An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535–557.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 53–73). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Kosonen, K., & Karlgren, K. (2011). The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 233–246.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2008). Examining barriers in technology-enhanced problem-based learning: Using a performance support systems approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 631–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrucco, C., & Grion, V. (2015). An exploratory study on perceptions and use of technology by novice and future teachers: More information and less on-line collaboration? International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 6(3), 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 37–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone, N., Cesareni, D., & Ligorio, M. B. (2016). Il Trialogical Learning Approach per rinnovare la didattica. [The Trialogical Learning Approach to innovate teaching] Italian Journal Of Educational Technology, 24, 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B., & Buglass, S. L. (2018). Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sipilä, K. (2014). Educational use of information and communications technology: Teachers’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23, 225–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2010). Co-operative learning: What makes group-work work. In H. Dumont, D. Istance & F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice (pp. 161–178). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M., & Broers, N. J. (2007). The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning: A matter of triangulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 353–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: Ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26, 157–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers – Competency standard modules. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001562/156207e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A. (2008). CSCL scripts: Effects of social and epistemic scripts on computer-supported collaborative learning. Berlin: VDM Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. (Rapport No 18). The Netherlands: Ruud deMoor Centrum.
   Google Scholar