Meaningful interaction: toward a new theoretical approach to online instruction

References

• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 82–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Epic and novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), and M. Holquist & C. Emersyn, Trans, The dialogic imagination (pp. 3–40). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. ( Original work published 1941).
   Google Scholar
• Barone, T. (2001). Touching eternity: The enduring outcomes of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. (R. Miller, Trans.). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. ( Original work published 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamim, R., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., … Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondanella, P. (1997). Umberto Eco and the open text. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. L. (2003). From teacher-centered to learner-centered curriculum: Improving learning in diverse classrooms. Education, 124, 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21, 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1977). The influence of darwinism on philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works (Vol. 4, pp. 3–14). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1909).
   Google Scholar
• Dwight, J., & Garrison, J. (2003). A manifesto for instructional technology: Hyperpedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105, 699–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1989). The open work. ( Anna Cancogni, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. ( Original work published 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. M., & Dwight, J. S. (2011). Toward a new standard of quality in online learning: Critical interaction and the death of the online instructor. In D. W. Surry, J. R. Stefurak, & R. M. Gray Jr (Eds.), Technology integration in higher education: Social and organizational aspects (pp. 253–266). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. M. (2017). Teaching and learning as textual acts: Roland Barthes, assessment, and the value of the writerly. In B. McLaughlin (Ed.), Theory lessons: Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing the classroom (pp. 95–115). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, R. (1987, March). Looking at interaction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Society for Performance and Instruction, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hostetter, C. (2013). Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13, 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hratinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52, 78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1971). Indeterminacy and the reader’s response. In Prospecting: From reader response to literary anthropology (1989) (pp. 3–30). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1980). Interaction between text and reader. In Prospecting: From reader response to literary anthropology (1989) (pp. 31–41). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. (2007). The student-centered classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. (2004). Task of the teaching life: Self through Bakhtinian dialogue and ideological engagement. Interchange, 35, 281–302.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. S., Winograd, K., & Lange, D. (2001). You can teach online: Building a creative learning environment. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Learning, 3(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Norvig, P. (2003). PowerPoint: Shot with its own bullets. Retrieved from http://www.norvig.com/lancet.html
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. (1997). Umberto Eco. The Johns Hopkins guide to literary theory and criticism. Retrieved from http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/hopkins_guide_to_literary_theory/umberto_eco.html
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. (2001, May 28). Absolute powerpoint: Can a software package edit our thoughts? The New Yorker, pp. 76–81.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, J. (1999). Jacques Derrida. Stanford Presidential Lectures in the Humanities and Arts. Retrieved from http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/
   Google Scholar
• Sheriff, J. K. (1989). The fate of meaning: Charles Peirce, structuralism, and literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, W. (1917). Thirteen ways of looking at a blackbird. In A. Kreymborg (Ed.), Others: An anthology of the new verse (pp. 109–111). New York, NY: A. A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional view of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.), Teaching and learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs (pp. 19–26). New Directions for Teaching and Learning 71. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3, 241–280.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, M. (2016, March 9). Active learning: In need of deeper exploration. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/active-learning-in-need-of-deeper-exploration/
   Google Scholar
• Yücel, Ü. A., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 97, 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar