Theorising effective uses of digital technology with activity theory

References

• Avis, J. (2007). Engeström’s version of activity theory: A conservative praxis? Journal of Education and Work, 20, 161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, J. (2009). Transformation or transformism: Engeström’s version of activity theory? Educational Review, 61, 151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerentsen, K. B., & Trettvik, J. (2002, October). An activity theory approach to affordance. Paper presented at the NordiCHI, Arhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, W., & Blayone, T. (2018). Student perceptions of fully online flipped community learning: A case study progress in education. In R. V. Nata (Ed.), Progress in education (Vol. 53, pp. 161–183). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bedny, G. Z., & Harris, S. R. (2005). The systemic-structural theory of activity: Applications to the study of human work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 128–147.
   Google Scholar
• Béguin, P., & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Blayone, T. (2017). Readiness for digital learning: Examining self-reported and observed mobile competencies as steps toward more effective learner readiness assessment ( Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: Choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23, 125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P., Kabayadondo, Z., Martin, A., & Fields, D. (2017). An assessment instrument of technological literacies in makerspaces and FabLabs. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 149–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016, July). Exploring the field of computational thinking as a 21st century skill. Paper presented at the EDULearn 2016 8th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunz, U. (2009). A generational comparison of gender, computer anxiety, and computer-email-web fluency. SIMILE: Studies In Media & Information Literacy Education, 9(2), 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2008). Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4, 183–193.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60, 148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemmensen, T., Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2016). Making HCI theory work: An analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35, 608–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (Ed.). (2017). Introduction to Vygotsky. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, F. J. (2005). Teachers’ representations of their computer related competencies profile: Toward a theory of ICT. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 31, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, F. J., Davidson, A. L., Blayone, T., vanOostveen, R., & Childs, E., (Producer). (2015). General technology competency and use: Foundations [Information poster]. Retrieved from http://eilab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/GTCU-Poster-V2-2000px.jpg
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, F. J., Lacasse, R., & Belair, L. M. (2001). Toward a definition of four orders of competency for the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in education. In Proceedings of the IASTED international conference. Computers and advanced technology in education (pp. 213–217). Banff, Canada: ACTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVane, B., & Squire, K. D. (2012). Activity theory in learning technologies. In D. H. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed., pp. 242–267). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elbanna, A. (2009). Actor network theory and IS research. In Y. K. Dwivedi, B. Lal, M. D. Williams, S. L. Schneberger, & M. Wade (Eds.), Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems (pp. 403–419). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, V. (2008). Exploring the contradictions in learning to teach: The potential of developmental work research. Changing English, 15, 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21, 598–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., Lahtinen, P., & Sannino, A. (2015). Toward a grammar of collaboration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 22, 92–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshet, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 9, 267–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Seville, Spain: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC68116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Seville, Spain: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC83167
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., & Wiltshire, T. J. (2016). Technology as teammate: Examining the role of external cognition in support of team cognitive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1531), 1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzsimons, G. E. (2003). Using Engestrom’s expansive learning framework to analyse a case study in adult mathematics education. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 12(2), 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2012). Troubling theory in case study research. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasu, M. (2000). Blind men and the elephant: Implementation of a new artifact as an expansive possibility. Outlines, 2, 5–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57, 407–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hoftede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence – An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 655–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordache, E., Mariën, I., & Baelden, D. (2017). Developing digital skills and competences: A quick-scan analysis of 13 digital literacy models. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9, 6–30.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: Learning with technology, not from technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6(2), 40–73.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Rohner-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47, 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (2015). Networked learning: An educational paradigm for the age of digital networks. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, S., Han, S., Kim, H., & Lee, W. (2014). Assessing the computational literacy of elementary students on a national level in Korea. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2012, May). Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective. Paper presented at the CHI 2012, Austin, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T., Kuutti, K., & Hickman, L. (1998). The concept of breakdown in Heidegger, Leont’ev, and Dewey and its implications for education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. American Psychologist, 41, 264–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky’s and Feurerstein’s perspectives in the study of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuti, K. (1992). Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: A case example. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), Proceedings of 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 233–240). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuti, K. (1995). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (1977a). Activity and consciousness (R. Daglish, Trans.). In V. Arshinov (Ed.), Philosophy in the USSR, problems of dialectical materialism (pp. 180–202). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (1977b). Automation and the human being [in Russian]. In Academy of Science, USSR (Ed.), Scientific-technical revolution and the human being (pp. 172–181). Moscow: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (2005a). The genesis of activity. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 43(4), 58–71.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (2005b). Letter from A. N. Leontiev to L. S. Vygotsky. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 43(3), 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (2006). “Units” and levels of activity. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 44(3), 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• McPhee, R. D., Poole, M. S., & Iverson, J. (2016). Structuration theory. In K. B. Jensen, E. W. Rothenbuhler, J. D. Pooley, & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 75–99). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Norros, L. (2017). Understanding acting in complex environments: Building a synergy of cultural-historical activity theory, Peirce, and ecofunctionalism. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 25, 68–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, S., & Bang, J. (2016). Historicizing affordance theory: A rendezvous between ecological psychology and cultural-historical activity theory. Theory & Psychology, 26, 731–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15, 665–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The hedgehog and the fox: A discussion of the approaches to the analysis of ICT reforms in teacher education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16, 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rückriem, G. (2009). Digital technology and mediation: A challenge to activity theory. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 88–111). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rückriem, G. (2014). What is ‘cultural-historical psychology’? Or: Activity theory as methodology. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 5, 311–325.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2009). Activity theory between historical engagement and future-making practice. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, C. C., & Woollard, J. (2010, March). Computational thinking: The developing definition. Paper presented at the SIGCSE 2014, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Seppanen, L. (2002). Creating tools for farmers’ learning: An application of developmental work research. Agricultural Systems, 73, 129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., & Clinton, K. A. (2006). Toolforthoughts: Reexamining thinking in the digital age. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2009). The culture of Vygotsky. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Compound mediation in software development: Using genre ecologies to study textual artifacts. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 97-124). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse, Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, P. (2016). HCI redux: The promise of post-cognitive interaction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2014). Measuring digital skills. Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes Project Report. Retrieved from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=112
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 891–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• vanOostveen, R., DiGiuseppe, M., Barber, W., Blayone, T., & Childs, E. (2016). New conceptions for digital technology sandboxes: Developing a Fully Online Learning Communities (FOLC) model. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), EdMedia 2016: World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 665–673). Vancouver, BC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• vanOostveen, R., Childs, E., Clarkson, J., & Flynn, K. (2015, June). Becoming close with others online: Distributed community building in online PBL courses. Paper presented at the EdMedia 2015 World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• vanOostveen, R., DiGiuseppe, M., Barber, W., & Blayone, T. (2016, November). Developing learning communities in fully online spaces. Paper presented at the Second International Symposium on Higher Education in Transformation, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Virtaluoto, J., Sannino, A., & Engeström, Y. (2016). Surviving outsourcing and offshoring. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30, 495–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Gomez, S. C., & Van Den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model. Retrieved from Luxembourg Publication Office of the European Union. EUR 27948 EN. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC101254
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, D., Chisalita, C. M., & Dix, A. (2016). Organizational affordances: A structuration theory approach to affordances. Interacting with Computers, 29, 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions (J. V. Wertsch, Trans.). In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-182). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The instrumental method in psychology. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 85–89). Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sciocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 202–208.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1992). LS Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 548–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosopical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1881), 3717–3725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. New York, NY: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Yamazumi, K. (2008). A hybrid activity system as educational innovation. Journal of Educational Change, 9, 365–373.
   Google Scholar
• Yasnitsky, A. (2008). From Vygotsky to Vygotskian psychology: Introduction to the history of the Kharkov school. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44, 119–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar