1,272
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Engaging with Bourdieu’s theory of practice: an empirical tool for exploring school students’ technology practice

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 413-423 | Received 01 Aug 2018, Accepted 14 May 2019, Published online: 28 Aug 2019

References

  • Apps, T. (2015). ICT literacy and the digital divide: Understanding primary students’ ICT practices and possibilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wollongong, Australia.
  • Beckman, K. (2015). Secondary school students’ technology practices in their everyday lives and at school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wollongong, Australia.
  • Beckman, K., Apps, T., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2018). Conceptualising technology practice in education using Bourdieu’s sociology. Learning, Media and Technology, 43, 197–210.
  • Beckman, K., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2014). Understanding students’ use and value of technology for learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 346–367.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–256). Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bulfin, S., & North, S. (2007). Negotiating digital literacy practices across school and home: Case studies of young people in Australia. Language and Education, 21, 247–263.
  • Cranmer, S. (2006). Children and young people’s uses of the Internet for homework. Learning, Media and Technology, 31, 301–315.
  • Everett, J. (2002). Organizational research and the praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 56–80.
  • Grenfell, M. (2009). Applying Bourdieu’s field theory: The case of social capital and education. Education, Knowledge and Economy, 3, 17–34.
  • Grenfell, M. (2012a). Methodology. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (2nd ed., pp. 213–228). Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing.
  • Grenfell, M. (2012b). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing.
  • Hardy, C. (2012). Social space. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (2nd ed., pp. 229–249). Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing.
  • Henry, M., Knight, J., Lingard, R., & Taylor, S. (2006). Understanding schooling: An introductory sociology of Australian education. London: Routledge.
  • Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus: Parents, social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 347–360.
  • Jenkins, R. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
  • Johnson, N. F. (2009). Cyber-relations in the field of home computer use for leisure: Bourdieu and teenage technological experts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 6, 187–197.
  • Kapitzke, C. (2000). Information technology as cultural capital: Shifting the boundaries of power. Education and Information Technologies, 5, 49–62.
  • Lareau, A. (1997). Social-class differences in family–school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy and society (pp. 703–717). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Maton, K. (2012). Habitus. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (2nd ed., pp. 48–64). Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing.
  • Mills, C. (2008). Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: The transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29, 79–89.
  • Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • North, S., Snyder, I., & Bulfin, S. (2008). Digital tastes: Social class and young people’s technology use. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 895–911.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Are the new Millennium learners making the grade? Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264076044-en
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Students, computers and learning. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264239555-en
  • Peillon, M. (1998). Bourdieu’s field and the sociology of welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 27, 213–229.
  • Reay, D. (1998). Rethinking social class: Qualitative perspectives on class and gender. Sociology, 32, 259–275.
  • Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 431–444.
  • Robinson, L. (2011). Information-channel preferences and information-opportunity structures. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 472–494.
  • Robinson, L. (2014). Endowed, entrepreneurial, and empowered-strivers: Doing a lot with a lot, doing a lot with a little. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 521–536. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.770049
  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6, 341–362.
  • Taylor, A. (2005). Finding the future that fits. Gender and Education, 17, 165–187.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.