Using Facebook groups to support teachers’ professional development

References

• Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2002). Virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice at caterpillar: Success factors and barriers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 94–113.
   Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S., & Rosenberg, H. (2015). The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher–student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S., & Bıçak, B. (2009). Geleneksel tamamlayıcı ölçme ve değerlendireme teknikleri (3rd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Kling, R. (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., & Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekiroğlu, F. O. (2004). Ne kadar başarılı/Klasik ve alternatif ölçme değerlendirme yöntemleri ve fizikte uygulamalar. Ankara: Nobel Publications.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çam, E. (2012). Educational and general use of Facebook and Facebook addiction of teacher candidates (SAU college of education sample) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sakarya University, Department of Educational Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N., & Chambers, D. P. (2006). Teacher professional learning in an online community: The experiences of the national quality schooling framework pilot project. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15, 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, N., & Colgan, L. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1051–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirli, C., Demirkol, M., & Özdemir, T. Y. (2010, July). The teachers’ opinion about the effects of online learning communities on professional development, IV. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu (pp. 24–26). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, İ. D. (2016). An examination of a Facebook group as a teacher professional development tool (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gaziantep University, Department of Educational Sciences, Gaziantep.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan‐Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 324–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, D., Oldridge, R., & Vasconcelos, A. (2004). Community and virtual community. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 145–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauville, G., Dupont, S., von Thun, S., & Lundin, J. (2015). Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook page and ocean literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 60–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 25–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3202507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (2002). Factors contributing to teachers’ successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 480–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, L. D., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Teaching for high standard, what policymakers need to know and be able to do. CPRE Research Reports. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/92
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30, 466–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Kervin, L., & Ferry, B. (2006). The design of an online community of practice for beginning teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6, 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 662–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Hara, N. (2007). Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 573–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W. (2007). Understanding teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in online communities of teachers? (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University. ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 279–303.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W., & Hara, N. (2007). Factors cultivating sustainable online communities for K–12 teacher professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 245–268.
   Google Scholar
• Jawecki, G., & Füller, J. (2008). How to use the innovative potential of online communities? Netnography – An unobtrusive research method to absorb the knowledge and creativity of online communities. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 3, 248–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, A. M. (2004). Improving teacher quality through professional development. Education, 124(3), 427.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. L., Wohn, D. Y., & Ellison, N. B. (2014). Actual friends matter: An internet skills perspective on teens’ informal academic collaboration on Facebook. Computers & Education, 79, 138–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, R., & Courtright, C. (2003). Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: A sociotechnical approach. The Information Society, 19, 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 221–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, J. V. (2006). A new image: Online communities to facilitate teacher professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 663–678.
   Google Scholar
• Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55, 444–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoNE. (1995). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Hizmetiçi Eğitim Yönetmeliği. Retrieved from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/51.html
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, R. A., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70, 138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? The Information Society, 19, 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt, D., St. Clair, N., & Martinez, E. E. (2013). Using Facebook to support novice teachers. The New Educator, 9, 152–163.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sugar, W. (2005). Instructional technologist as a coach: Impact of a situated professional development program on teachers’ technology use. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 547–571.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yazıcı, H., Reisoğlu, S., & Altun, F. (2012). The relationship between ethnographer’s values and research method and results. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences, 1, 649–657.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Rop, S. (2001). A critical review of the literature on electronic networks as reflective discourse communities for inservice teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 6, 81–94.
   Google Scholar