References
- American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073.https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
- Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer‐to‐peer dialog. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x
- Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/download/140/394?inline=1
- Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D., & Miller, D. (2009). Engaging college science students and changing academic achievement with technology: A quasi-experimental preliminary investigation. Computers & Education, 52(2), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.005
- Cen, L., Ruta, D., Powell, L., Hirsch, B., & Ng, J. (2016). Quantitative approach to collaborative learning: Performance prediction, individual assessment, and group composition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 187–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9234-6
- Chapman, C., Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005). Strong community, deep learning: Exploring the link. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500167910
- Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
- Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12243
- Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self‐explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
- Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
- Chiu, M. M. (2008). Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 415–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802224830
- Dalelio, C. (2013). Student participation in online discussion boards in a higher education setting. International Journal on E-Learning, 12(3), 249–271. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/37555/
- Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Tanner, E. J. (2001). How do students participate in synchronous and asynchronous online discussions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.2190/6DCH-BEN3-V7CF-QK47
- De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005
- Ergulec, F. (2016). Building collaborative learning communities in online courses. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 2016(1), 622–636. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173009/
- Felman, A., & Herman, B. C. (2014). Teacher contextual knowledge. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 1020–1021). Springer. https://doi.org/org/0.1007/978-94-007-6165-0
- Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 8–38). Teachers College Press.
- Graham, C. R., & Misanchuk, M. (2005). Computer-mediated learning groups. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (1st ed., pp. 502–507). IGI Global.
- Gress, C. L., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 806–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.012
- Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, R. P. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Cscl 2 (pp. 151-204). Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284977644_Epistemology_of_inquiry_and_computer-supported_collaborative_learning
- Häkkinen, P. (2004). What makes learning and understanding in virtual teams so difficult? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104323024465
- Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Sharing and constructing perspectives in web-based conferencing. Computers & Education, 47(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.015
- Harasim, L. (1997, May). Interacting in hyperspace: Developing collaborative learning environments on the WWW [Paper presentation]. Workshop on Improving economic management training, Economic development institute (EDI), the World Bank, Marrakech, Morocco.
- Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 117–136). Springer-Verlag.
- Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., Toroff, M., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2000). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 103-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i2.1904
- Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
- Huang, E. Y., Lin, S. W., & Huang, T. K. (2012). What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.003
- Hull, D. M., & Saxon, T. F. (2009). Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: An experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. Computers & Education, 52(3), 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.005
- Ioannou, A., Brown, S. W., & Artino, A. R. (2015). Wikis and forums for collaborative problem-based activity: A systematic comparison of learners’ interactions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.001
- Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004
- Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Kollar, I., & Lee, L. (2015, November, 25). Regulated learning in CSCL: Theoretical progress for learning success [Keynote presentation]. Annual EAPRIL conference – education & learning, Belval, Luxembourg.
- Järvelä, S., & Salovaara, H. (2004). The interplay of motivational goals and cognitive strategies in a new pedagogical culture: A context-oriented and qualitative approach. European Psychologist, 9(4), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.4.232
- Jeong, H., & Chi, M. T. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35(4), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9008-z
- Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2011). A complexity-grounded model for the emergence of convergence in CSCL groups. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens, & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series (Vol. 12, pp. 3–23). Springer.
- Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2016). Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 97(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002
- Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Held, C. (2010). The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: Technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 8(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.36
- Koschmann, T., Hall, R. P., & Miyake, N. (Eds.). (2002). CSCL 2. Routledge.
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
- Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Ootes, S. A. (2003). Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers & Education, 41(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00050-2
- Lou, Y., & Kim MacGregor, S. (2004). Enhancing project-based learning through online between-group collaboration. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(4–6), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610512331383509
- Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers & Education, 40(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9
- Nainabasti, B., Brookes, D. T., Yang, Y., & Lin, Y. (2015, July 29–30). Connection between participation in interactive learning environment and learning through teamwork [Paper presentation]. Physics education research conference 2015, College Park, MD.
- Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165942
- Patel, J., & Aghayere, A. (2006, October 27–31). Students’ perspective on the impact of aweb-based discussion forum on student learning [Paper presentation]. Frontiers in education. 36th annual conference, San Diego, CA.
- Patriarcheas, K., & Xenos, M. (2010, November 4–5).Collaborative learning: Reasons that influence the participation of students in distance education fora [Paper presentation]. 1st social applications for lifelong learning conference, Patra, Greece.
- Paus, E., Werner, C. S., & Jucks, R. (2012). Learning through online peer discourse: Structural equation modeling points to the role of discourse activities in individual understanding. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1127–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.008
- Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307
- Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: Divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.012
- Robertson, J. S., Grant, M. M., & Jackson, L. (2005). Is online instruction perceived as effective as campus instruction by graduate students in education? The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.004
- Romero, C., López, M. I., Luna, J. M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Computers & Education, 68(1), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.009
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2007). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71. https://auspace.athabascau.ca/bitstream/handle/2149/732/Assessing%20Social%20Presence%20In?sequence=1
- Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010
- Shaw, R. S. (2012). A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums. Computers & Education, 58(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.013
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
- Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034943
- Strijbos, J. W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.37
- Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2013). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x
- Thiessen, D. (2000). Developing knowledge for preparing teachers: Redefining the role of schools of education. Educational Policy, 14(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904800014001011
- Topcu, A. (2008). ‘Intentional repetition’ and learning style: Increasing efficient and cohesive interaction in asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00783.x
- Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
- Veerman, A., & Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2001, March 22–24). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education [Paper presentation]. Euro CSCL conference, Maastricht.
- Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4
- Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 339–362. https://www.vrasidas.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/continuum.pdf
- Webb, E., Jones, A., Barker, P., & van Schaik, P. (2004). Using e-learning dialogues in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000172748
- Wei, F. H., & Chen, G. D. (2006). Collaborative mentor support in a learning context using a ubiquitous discussion forum to facilitate knowledge sharing for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00674.x
- Wei, H. C., Peng, H., & Chou, C. (2015). Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students’ perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Computers & Education, 83(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013
- Yücel, Ü. A., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 97(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.015
- Zhao, K., & Chan, C. K. (2014). Fostering collective and individual learning through knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9188-x
- Zhu, E. (1996). Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 397 849.
- Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0