References
- Alvarez, C., Brown, C., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Comparative study of netbooks and tablet PCs for fostering face-to-face collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 834–844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.008
- Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782425
- Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
- Benson, E. R., Krawcyzk, C., & Figueiredo, G. F. (2006). Evaluation of tablet and laptop computers in field and laboratory settings. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(6), 1189–1196.
- Bester, G., & Brand, L. (2013). The effect of technology on learner attention and achievement in the classroom. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n2a405
- Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Framing ICT-enabled innovation for learning: The case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12021
- Burke, A., & Hughes, J. (2018). A shifting landscape: Using tablets to support learning in students with diverse abilities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1396492
- Chabert, G., Marty, J. C., Caron, B., Carron, T., Vignollet, L., & Ferraris, C. (2006). The electronic schoolbag, a CSCW workspace: Presentation and evaluation. AI & Society, 20(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0026-1
- Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2016). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 317–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709
- Disterer, G., & Kleiner, C. (2013). BYOD Bring Your Own Device. Procedia Technology, 9, 43–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.005
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
- Gu, X., & Zhang, R. (2014). Innovative application of E-textbook: Experiences from international projects. Modern Distance Education Research, 1, 55–61.
- Gu, X., Zhu, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the “Digital Natives”: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 392–402.
- Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995
- Huang, L., Li, S., Poitras, E. G., & Lajoie, S. P. (2021). Latent profiles of self‐regulated learning and their impacts on teachers’ technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 695–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13050
- Kong, S. C. (2011). An evaluation study of the use of a cognitive tool in a one-to-one classroom for promoting classroom-based dialogic interaction. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1851–1864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.008
- Kraemer, K. L., Dedrick, J., & Sharma, P. (2009). One laptop per child: Vision vs. reality. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 66–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1516046.1516063
- Li, S., & Zheng, J. (2017). The effect of academic motivation on students’ English learning achievement in the eSchoolbag-based learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, 4(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-017-0042-x
- Li, S., & Zheng, J. (2018a). A latent profile analysis of students’ motivation of engaging in one-to-one computing environment for English learning. EAI Endorsed Transactions on E-Learning, 5(17), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-9-2018.155574
- Li, S., & Zheng, J. (2018b). The relationship between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning in one-to-one computing environment: The mediated role of task values. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(6), 455–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0405-2
- Li, S., Zheng, J., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Towards a new approach to managing teacher online learning: Learning communities as activity systems. The Social Science Journal, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.04.008
- Ling Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78(2014), 20–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022
- Liu, F. (2013). The eSchoolbag for the educational purpose. E-Education Research, 2013 (1), 73–85.
- Martens, R. L., Gulikerst, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2004). The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(5), 368–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00096.x
- Ni, M., Kwok, L. F., Zhen, L., Xie, Y., Long, H., Zheng, X., & Li, W. (2015). A study of an e-schoolbag supporting flipped classroom model for junior mathematics review class. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9167, 243–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20621-9_20
- Ozok, A. A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2008). A comparative study between tablet and laptop PCs: User satisfaction and preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310801920524
- Penuel, W. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782463
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2015). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, (2015) 252–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
- Wang, T., & Towey, D. (2012). A rethinking of digital learning device projects. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2012. Hong Kong, China. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360298
- Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024
- Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
- Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal Spring, 39(1), 165–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039001165
- Xie, Y., Sun, N., Mei, X., Kong, Z., & Kwok, L. F. (2016). Research of English oral communication ability cultivating model in junior middle school based on E-schoolbag. In Proceedings – 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology, EITT 2015 (pp. 247–252). Wuhan, China. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2015.59
- Xie, Y., Wang, Q., Li, Y., Kwok, L. F., Yang, Y., & Guo, F. (2015). Research on problem-oriented instruction mode supported by electronic schoolbag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9167, 231–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20621-9_19
- Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020). What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612
- Zheng, J., Li, S., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Students’ technology acceptance, motivation and self-efficacy towards the eSchoolbag: An exploratory study. International Journal for Infonomics, 10(3), 1350–1358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2017.0165
- Zhu, Z., & Yu, X. (2011). The eSchoolbag system and its functional designs. E-education Research, 2011 (4), 24–27.
- Zucker, A. A., & Light, D. (2009). Laptop programs for students. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323(5910), 82–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167705