#Fact or #opinion: the educational design of a microblogging activity intended to engage students in productive interactions

References

• Alexander, R. J. (2004). Dialogic Teaching (York: Dialogos).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge‐building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9225-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, V., Warwick, P., Vrikki, M., Major, L., & Wegerif, R. (2019). Developing material-dialogic space in geography learning and teaching: Combining a dialogic pedagogy with the use of a microblogging tool. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 217–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deSousa, F., & Rasmussen, I. (2019). Productive disciplinary engagement and videogames. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 14(3–4), 99–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18261/.1891-943x-2019-03-04-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2019). Clicker interventions at university lectures and the feedback gap. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 14(1–2), 70–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18261/.1891-943x-2019-01-02-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., & Bubikova-Moan, J. (2019). Argumentation as a pathway to critical thinking. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 352–362). Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., & Krange, I. (2020). Hvordan fremme kritisk tenkning i grunnskolen? [How to promote critical thinking in primary school?]. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 104(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18261/.1504-2987-2020-02-09
   Google Scholar
• Frøytlog, J. I. J., & Rasmussen, I. (2020). The distribution and productivity of whole-class dialogues: Exploring the potential of microblogging. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauge, T. E., Lund, A., & Vestøl, J. M. (2007). Undervisning i endring: IKT, aktivitet, design [Teaching in transformation: ICT, activity, design]. Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S. (2011). The role of digital artefacts on the interactive whiteboard in supporting classroom dialogue. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 463–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerawalla, L., Petrou, M., & Scanlon, E. (2013). Talk factory: Supporting “exploratory talk” around an interactive whiteboard in primary school science plenaries. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.745049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., Hennessy, S., Wegerif, R., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Research methods for educational dialogue. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., Mercer, N., Warwick, P., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2010). Can the interactive whiteboard support young children’s collaborative communication and thinking in classroom science activities? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 359–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9096-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, K., Ness, I. J., & Timmis, S. (2019). Writing on the wall: How the use of technology can open dialogical spaces in lectures. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 34, 100559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Designs for teaching and learning in technology-rich learning environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(4), 258–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18261/1891-943X-2011-04-05
   Google Scholar
• Major, L., Warwick, P., Rasmussen, I., Ludvigsen, S., & Cook, V. (2018). Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1995–2028. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9701-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920410001689689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, E., Rattray, J., & Lavery, J. (2015). Twitter in the collaborative classroom: Micro-blogging for in-class collaborative discussions. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 3(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2015.070764
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/24783
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Data Protection Services. (n.d.). Norsk senter for forskningsdata. NSD. https://nsd.no
   Google Scholar
• Omland, M., & Rødnes, K. A. (2020). Building agency through technology-aided dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 26, 100406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omland, M. (2021). Technology-aided meaning-making across participation structures: Interruptions, interthinking and synthesising. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills education 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/about/documents/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J. P., Jakubiec, B. A., Jones, J., & Earl, R. (2015). Twitter in a Bachelor of Education course: Student experiences. LEARNing Landscapes, 8(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v8i2.710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I., & Hagen, Å. (2015). Facilitating students’ individual and collective knowledge construction through microblogs. International Journal of Educational Research, 72 (1), 149–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I. (2012). Trajectories of participation: Temporality and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning Part 20/T. (pp. s3334–s3337). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smørdal, O., Rasmussen, I., & Major, L. (2021). Supporting classroom dialogue through developing the Talkwall microblogging tool: Considering emerging concepts that bridge theory, practice and design. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 16(2), 50-64 . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18261/.1891-943x-2021-02-02
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Using Twitter for education. Beneficial or a waste of time? Computers & Education, 106, 97–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2018, November 26). Hva er fagfornyelsen? [What is the new Norwegian Curriculum?]. Utdanningsdirektoratet. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/fagfornyelsen/nye-lareplaner-i-skolen
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2020). Overordnet del – Verdier og prinsipper for grunnopplæringen [Norwegian Curriculum – Norms and guidelines]. Utdanningsdirektoratet. https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, P., Cook, V., Vrikki, M., Major, L., & Rasmussen, I. (2020). Realising “dialogic intentions” when working with a microblogging tool in secondary school classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Major, L. (2019). Introduction to the Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. In N. Mercer, L. Major, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 1–8). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar