References
- Bartsch, R. A., & Murphy, W. (2011). Examining the effects of an electronic classroom response system on student engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.1.b
- Bunce, D. M., Flens, E. A., & Neiles, K. Y. (2010). How long can students pay attention in class? A study of student attention decline using clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1438–1443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100409p
- Duggan, P. M., Palmer, E., & Devitt, P. (2007). Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: A randomised trial. BMC Medical Education, 7(1), 25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-7-25
- Fallon, M., & Forrest, S. L. (2011). High-tech versus low-tech instructional strategies: A comparison of clickers and handheld response cards. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 194–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411896
- FitzPatrick, K. A., Finn, K. E., & Campisi, J. (2011). Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(3), 280–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00036.2011
- Goss Lucas, S., & Bernstein, D. A. (2015). Teaching psychology: A step-by-step guide (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
- Gupta, B., White, D. A., & Walmsley, A. D. (2004). The attitudes of undergraduate students and staff to the use of electronic learning. British Dental Journal, 196(8), 487–492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811179
- Hartley, J., & Cameron, A. (1967). Some observations on the efficiency of lecturing. Educational Review, 20(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191670200103
- Hestenes, D., & Wells, M. (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343498
- Holmes, D. C., Boston, D. W., Budenz, A. W., & Licari, F. W. (2003). Predoctoral clinical curriculum models at U.S. and Canadian dental schools. Journal of Dental Education, 67(12), 1302–1311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.12.tb03722.x
- Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013
- Johnstone, A. H., & Percival, F. (1976). Attention breaks in lectures. Education in Chemistry, 13(2), 49–50.
- Kennedy, G. E., & Cutts, Q. I. (2005). The association between students’ use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 260–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00133.x
- Lee, S. Y. (2014). Examining the factors that influence early adopters’ smartphone adoption: The case of college students. Telematics and Informatics, 31(2), 308–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.06.001
- Lesaffre, E. (2009). Statistical and methodological aspects of oral health research. John Wiley & Sons.
- Llena, C., Forner, L., & Cueva, R. (2015). Student evaluation of clickers in a dental pathology course. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 7(3), e369–e373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52299
- Lloyd, D. (1968). A concept of improvement of learning response in the taught lesson. Visual Education, 1, 23–25.
- Morrell, L. J., & Joyce, D. A. (2015). Interactive lectures: Clickers or personal devices? F1000Research, 4, 64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6207.1
- Rodrigues, A., Montague, K., Nicolau, H., & Guerreiro, T. (2015). Getting smartphones to talkback: Understanding the smartphone adoption process of blind users. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 23–32). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809842
- Scerbo, M. W., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Grasha, A. F. (1992). The role of time and cuing in a college lecture. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(4), 312–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(92)90070-F
- Shardlow, J. (2016). Consciousness, attention, and conscious attention. Philosophical Psychology, 29(7), 1068–1070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1200718
- Stuart, J., & Rutherford, R. J. (1978). Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet (London, England), 2(8088), 514–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92233-X
- Taleghani, M., Solomon, E. S., & Wathen, W. F. (2006). Grading dental students in a ‘nongraded’ clinical assessment program. Journal of Dental Education, 70(5), 500–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.5.tb04104.x
- Waterval, D., Tinnemans-Adriaanse, M., Meziani, M., Driessen, E., Scherpbier, A., Mazrou, A., & Frambach, J. (2017). Exporting a student-centered curriculum: A home institution’s perspective. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(3), 278–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315317697542
- Wilson, K., & Korn, J. H. (2007). Attention during lectures: Beyond ten minutes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009862830703400202