393
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and sports bracelets usage in physical education for freshmen: the role of gender and self-efficacy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 45-63 | Received 22 Aug 2020, Accepted 07 Apr 2022, Published online: 27 Dec 2022

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Albarq, A. (2014). An empirical investigation to validate the Technology Acceptance Model TAM in explaining intentions to shop online in Saudi Arabia using SEM. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 10(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.12816/0026195
  • Al-Emran, M., and Granić, A. (2021). Is it still valid or outdated? A bibliometric analysis of the technology acceptance model and its applications from 2010 to 2020. In M. Al-Emran & K. Shaalan (Eds.), Recent advances in technology acceptance models and theories (pp. 1–12). Springer.
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x
  • Bailey, R. (2018). Sport, physical education and educational worth. Educational Review, 70(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1403208
  • Bandura, A. (1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13(3), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(82)90004-0
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Beauchamp, M. R., Barling, J., & Morton, K. L. (2011). Transformational teaching and adolescent self-determined motivation, self-efficacy, and intentions to engage in leisure time physical activity: A randomised controlled pilot trial. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-being, 3(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01048.x
  • Beldad, A. D., & Hegner, S. M. (2018). Expanding the technology acceptance model with the inclusion of trust, social influence, and health valuation to determine the predictors of German users’ willingness to continue using a fitness app: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(9), 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1403220
  • Bigne, E., Ruiz, C., & Sanz, S. (2005). The impact of internet user shopping patterns and demographics on consumer mobile buying behaviour. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(3), 193–209. http://web.csulb.edu/journals/jecr/p_i.htm
  • Bolter, N. D., Kipp, L., & Johnson, T. (2018). Teaching sportsmanship in physical education and youth sport: Comparing perceptions of teachers with students and coaches with athletes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0038
  • Brière, N. M., Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1995). Développement et validation d'une mesure de motivation intrinsèque, extrinsèque et d'amotivation en contexte sportif: l'échelle de motivation dans les sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26(4), 465–489.
  • Dai, Y., Guo, J., Yang, L., & You, W. (2019). A new approach of intelligent physical health evaluation based on GRNN and BPNN by using a wearable smart bracelet system. Procedia Computer Science, 147, 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.235
  • Daum, D. N., Goad, T., Killian, C. M., & Schoenfeld, A. (2021). How do we do this? Distance learning in physical education – Part 1. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 92(4), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2021.1886836
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1002. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Deng, C. H., Wang, J. Q., Zhu, L. M., Liu, H. W., Guo, Y., Peng, X. H., Xia, W., & Xia, W. (2020). Association of web-based physical education with mental health of college students in Wuhan during the COVID-19 outbreak: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e21301. https://doi.org/10.2196/21301
  • Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information Management, 36(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3
  • Dumpit, D. Z., & Fernandez, C. J. (2017). Analysis of the use of social media in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0045-2
  • Dutta, B., Peng, M. H., & Sun, S. L. (2018). Modeling the adoption of personal health record (PHR) among individual: The effect of health-care technology self-efficacy and gender concern. Libyan Journal of Medicine, 13(1), 1500349. https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2018.1500349
  • Estriegana, R., Medina-Merodio, J. A., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 135, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133515
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
  • He, J., & Freeman, L. A. (2010). Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 203–212. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol21/iss2/7
  • Huang, G., & Ren, Y. (2020). Linking technological functions of fitness mobile apps with continuance usage among Chinese users: Moderating role of exercise self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.013
  • Huang, J., & Wang, G. (2018). Research on the application of sports bracelet in college physical education. Advances in Computer Science Research, 83, 1087–1090. https://doi.org/10.2991/snce-18.2018.225
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Humbert, M. L., Chad, K. E., Spink, K. S., Muhajarine, N., Anderson, K. D., Bruner, M. W., Gryba, C. R., Odnokon, P., & Gryba, C. R. (2006). Factors that influence physical activity participation among high-and low-SES youth. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305286051
  • Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Ramayah, T., & Mutahar, A. M. (2017). Internet usage within government institutions in Yemen: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) with internet self-efficacy and performance impact. Science International, 29(4), 737–747.
  • Jan, M. T., & Haque, A. (2014). Antecedents of the use of online banking by students in Malaysia extended TAM validated through SEM. International Business Management, 8(5), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.36478/ibm.2014.277.284
  • Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
  • Karjaluoto, H., & Huhtamäki, M. (2010). The role of electronic channels in micro-sized brick-and-mortar firms. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2010.10593471
  • Kim, Y., Lumpkin, A., Lochbaum, M., Stegemeier, S., & Kitten, K. (2018). Promoting physical activity using a wearable activity tracker in college students: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(16), 1889–1896. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1423886
  • King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
  • Klein, H. K., Hirschheim, R., & Nissen, H. E. (1991). A pluralist perspective of the information systems research arena. Elsevier.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Lei, P. (2021). Research on the quality of online teaching of college physical education courses under the impact of the epidemic. Journal of Frontiers in Educational Research, 1(4), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.23977/avte.2021.030425
  • Leung, S. O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.580697
  • Li, F., Chen, J., & Baker, M. (2014). University students’ attitudes toward physical education teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(2), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2012-0187
  • Li, R., Chung, T. L. D., & Fiore, A. M. (2017). Factors affecting current users’ attitude towards e-auctions in China: An extended TAM study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.003
  • Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2014). Role of gender on acceptance of mobile payment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2013-0137
  • Lin, X., Featherman, M., & Sarker, S. (2017). Understanding factors affecting users’ social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective. Information & Management, 54(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.09.004
  • Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20177
  • Lip-Sam, T., & Hock-Eam, L. (2011). Estimating the determinants of B2B e-commerce adoption among small & medium enterprises. International Journal of Business & Society, 12(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4888-1
  • Lunney, A., Cunningham, N. R., & Eastin, M. S. (2016). Wearable fitness technology: A structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.007
  • Ma, Y. J., Gam, H. J., & Banning, J. (2017). Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: Application of the technology acceptance model. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0093-1
  • Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
  • Marttinen, R., Landi, D., Fredrick, R. N., & Silverman, S. (2019). Wearable digital technology in PE: Advantages, barriers, and teachers’ ideologies. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0240
  • McAuley, E., & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28(2), 85–88. https://journals.lww.com/acsm-essr/Citation/2000/28020/Self_Efficacy_Determinants_and_Consequences_of.8.aspx
  • Mercier, K., Centeio, E., Garn, A., Erwin, H., Marttinen, R., & Foley, J. (2021). Physical education teachers’ experiences with remote instruction during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(2), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0272
  • Molina, M. D., & Sundar, S. S. (2020). Can mobile apps motivate fitness tracking? A study of technological affordances and workout behaviors. Health Communication, 35(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1536961
  • Motti, V. G. (2020). Wearable interaction. Springer.
  • Munoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 21(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2016.12.001
  • Mutahar, A. M., Daud, N. M., Ramayah, T., Isaac, O., & Aldholay, A. H. (2018). The effect of awareness and perceived risk on the technology acceptance model (TAM): Mobile banking in Yemen. International Journal of Services and Standards, 12(2), 180–204. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSS.2018.091840
  • Ni, Y. (2014). The cultivation and stimulation of freshmen’s physical education learning motivation. China Education Innovation Herald, 8, 175–176.
  • Nuss, K., Moore, K., Nelson, T., & Li, K. (2021). Effects of motivational interviewing and wearable fitness trackers on motivation and physical activity: A systematic review. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120939030
  • Ong, Ch, S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
  • Opoku, D., Pobee, F., & Okyireh, R. O. (2020). Determinants of e-learning system adoption among Ghanaian university lecturers: An application of information system success and Technology Acceptance Models. Humanities, 5(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2016.12.001
  • Park, C., Kim, D. G., Cho, S., & Han, H. J. (2019). Adoption of multimedia technology for learning and gender difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.029
  • Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
  • Pimmer, C., Mateescu, M., & Gröhbiel, U. (2016). Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.057
  • Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011
  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Routledge.
  • Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K., & Tarhini, A. (2019). Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9786-3
  • Schoonenboom, J. (2014). Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others. Computers & Education, 71, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rded.). Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Sills, S. J., & Song, C. (2002). Innovations in survey research. Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930202000103
  • Simon, S. J., Grover, V., Teng, J. T., & Whitcomb, K. (1996). The relationship of information system training methods and cognitive ability to end-user satisfaction, comprehension, and skill transfer: A longitudinal field study. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 466–490. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.4.466
  • Stride, A., Flintoff, A., Fitzgerald, H., Drury, S., & Brazier, R. (2018). Gender, physical education and active lifestyles: Contemporary challenges and new directions. Sport, Education and Society, 23(7), 633–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1494564
  • Swanson, E. B. (1988). Information system implementation: Bridging the gap between design and utilization. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Taat, M. S., & Francis, A. (2020). Factors influencing the students’ acceptance of e-learning at teacher education institute: An exploratory study in Malaysia. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p133
  • Tao, D., Wang, T., Wang, T., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., & Qu, X. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.023
  • Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9080-3
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
  • Wong, C. K., Yeung, D. Y., Ho, H. C., Tse, K. P., & Lam, C. Y. (2014). Chinese older adults’ Internet use for health information. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 33(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464812463430
  • Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2019). Modeling the intention to use machine translation for student translators: An extension of Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 133, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.015
  • Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2001). Improving computer training effectiveness for decision technologies: Behavior modeling and retention enhancement. Decision Sciences, 32(3), 521–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00970.x
  • Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information systems research, 14(2), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.146.16016
  • Yul, J. K. (2014). Determinants of users’ intention to adopt mobile fitness applications: An extended technology acceptance model approach (Publication No. 3641225) [Doctoral dissertation], Purdue University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  • Zhang, J. (2009). Exploring drivers in the adoption of mobile commerce in China. Journal of American Academy of Business, 15(1), 64–69.
  • Zhang, X., Han, X., Dang, Y., Meng, F., Guo, X., & Lin, J. (2016). User acceptance of mobile health services from users’ perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 42(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2016.1200053
  • Zhang, X., & Meng, C. (2009). The status and countermeasures on freshmen physical education of college. Journal of Hubei Sports Science, 3, 344–346.
  • Zheng, Y., Wei, Y., & Liang, C. (2018). On the connection between high school and college PE teaching from three qualities of freshmen. Sports Time, 18, 84. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1009-9328.2018.18.071

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.