Computational thinking in K–12 computer education: appropriate pedagogy

References

• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
   Google Scholar
• Bers, M., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, M., Wood, L., Lai, J., Howe, C., Lister, R., Mason, R., Highfield, K., & Veal, J. (2017). Improving the computational thinking pedagogical capabilities of school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April 13–17). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking [Paper presentation]. Annual American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Caeli, E., & Bundsgaard, J. (2020). Computational thinking in compulsory education: A survey study on initiatives and conceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09694-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, H., Kraft, R., & Plessis, J. (1998). Teacher development – Making an impact. USAID.
   Google Scholar
• CSTA (The Computer Science Teachers Association) & ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). Computational Thinking in K-12 Education: teacher resources. (2011). 2nd ed. http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/ct-teacher-resources_2ed-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=2
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llamazares, C., Hernández-Gago, Y., Pozas, M., Cabañas, M., Feal, B., Villaronga, M., Del Vayo, A., Valverde, E., & Armendáriz, J. (2013). Two-round Delphi technique for the consensual design of a paediatric pharmaceutical care model. Pharmacological Research, 68(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2012.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, C. (1987). The Delphi technique: A critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12(6), 729–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01376.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, J., Yadav, A., & Mishra, P. (2017). Computational thinking in computer science classrooms: Viewpoints from CS educators. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 51–59). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzdial, M. (2011, March 22). A definition of computational thinking from Jeannette Wing. Computing Ed Research. https://computinged.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/a-definition-of-computational-thinking-from-jeanette-wing/
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal for Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmer, O. (1983). Looking forward: A guide to future research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, T., Chang, S., & Hung, Y. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisstede, B., Miedema, H., Verhagen, A., Koes, B., & Verhaar, J. (2007). Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(5), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.023861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilic, U., Haseski, H. İ., & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Publication trends over 10 years of computational thinking research. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.414798
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, S., & Michael, W. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation. Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). 2016. ISTE standards for students. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students
   Google Scholar
• Kolodziej,M. (2017). Computational thinking in curriculum for higher education. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pepperdine University Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/807
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151(103872), 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872
   Google Scholar
• Lye, S., & Koh, J. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (2008). Defining pedagogy. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 28–39). SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nworie, J. (2011). Using the Delphi technique in educational technology research. Tech Trends, 55(5), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0524-6
   Google Scholar
• OER In Education. (2012). ORBIT: The open resource bank for interactive teaching. http://oer.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/Teaching_Approaches/Visualisation
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, A., & Sadera, W. (2020). Teaching competencies for student-centered, one-to-one learning environments: A Delphi study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 1910–1934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118816651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects – Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1487–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby, C. (2015). Relationships: Computational thinking, pedagogy of programming, and Bloom’s taxonomy. In Proceeding of the 10th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 80–87). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818315
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M. (2019). Practical pedagogy: 40 new ways to teach and learn. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2005). Education for all global monitoring report: The quality imperative. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Verhagen, A., De Vet, H., De Bie, R., Kessels, A., Boers, M., Bouter, L., & Knipschild, P. (1998). The Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(12), 1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00131-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viskovic, I. (2013.) Application of Delphi method in pedagogy. In Proceedings of 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference Problems of Empirical Research in Psychology (pp. 226–231). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306373762_Application_of_Delphi_Method_in_pedagogy
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Wang, Y. (2016). A study on computer teaching based on computational thinking. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(12), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i12.6069
   Google Scholar
• Werner, L., Denner, J., & Campe, S. (2012). The fairy performance assessment: Measuring computational thinking in middle school. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education – SIGCSE, 12, 215–220. https://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~linda/pubs/SIGCSE2012Fairy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Westbrook, J., Durrani, N., Brown, R., Orr, D., Pryor, J., Boddy, J., & Salvi, F. (2013). Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries. (Report No. EPPI-2110). DFID.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why? Thelink – The magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B., Hu, Y., Ruis, A., & Wang, M. (2019). Analyzing computational thinking in collaborative programming: A quantitative ethnography approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., & McLean, T. (2017). Computational thinking in teacher education. In P. J. Rich & C. B. Hodges (Eds.), Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 205–220). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, W., Kua, P., Soon, S., Pek, P., & Ong, M. (2016). DARE train-the-trainer pedagogy development using 2-round Delphi methodology. BioMed Research International, 2016, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5460964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar