689
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

EdTech myths: towards a critical digital educational agenda

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 605-620 | Received 21 Jul 2021, Accepted 22 Nov 2022, Published online: 09 Aug 2023

References

  • Albion, P., & Ertmer, P. A. (2002). Beyond the foundations: The role of vision and belief in teachers’ preparation for integration of technology. TechTrends, 46(5), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818306
  • Balanskat, A., Bannister, D., Hertz, B., Sigillò, E., Vuorikari, R., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Overview and analysis of 1: 1 learning initiatives in Europe. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.2791/20333
  • Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Média Diffusion.
  • Belland, B. R. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers & Education, 52(2), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2008.09.004
  • Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634319
  • Bonal, X., Zancajo, A., & Scandurra, R. (2019). Residential segregation and school segregation of foreign students in Barcelona. Urban Studies, 56(15), 3251–3273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019863662
  • Bozkurt, A., Ozdamar Keskin, N., & De Waard, I. (2016). Research trends in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) theses and dissertations: Surfing the Tsunami wave. Open Praxis, 8(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.287
  • Buckingham, D. (2020). Epilogue: Rethinking digital literacy: Media education in the age of digital capitalism. Digital Education Review, 37(37), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.230–239
  • Burch, P., & Miglani, N. (2018). Technocentrism and social fields in the Indian EdTech movement: Formation, reproduction and resistance. Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 590–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1435909
  • Campbell, J. (1988). The power of Myth, with Bill Moyer. Penguin Random House.
  • Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
  • Cavanagh, A. (2013). Sociology in the internet age. McGraw-Hill.
  • Cheng, S. L., Chen, S., & Chang, J. (2020). Examining the multiplicative relationships between teachers’ competence, value and pedagogical beliefs about technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13052
  • Chung, K., Lo, M., & Khe, F. H. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
  • Cobo, C., & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2018). Enhancing social inclusion through innovative mobile learning in Uruguay. Case study by the UNESCO Fazheng Project on best practices in mobile learning. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366324
  • Creighton, T. B. (2018). Digital natives, digital immigrants, digital learners: An international empirical integrative review of the literature. Education Leadership Review, 19(1), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1090172
  • Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Cueto, S., Santiago, A., & Severín, E. (2017). Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150385
  • Cummings, S., Regeer, B., de Haan, L., Zweekhorst, M., & Bunders, J. (2018). Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on knowledge and the knowledge society within the sustainable development goals. Development Policy Review, 36(6), 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12296
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  • Díez-Gutiérrez, E. J. (2020). Neoliberal hybrid governance in public education. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 83(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8313817
  • Eliade, M. (1991). Myth and reality. Labor.
  • Erstad, O., Miño, R., & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2021). Educational practices to transform and connect schools and communities. Comunicar, 66(66), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-01
  • Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills paradox: How do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the internet? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845
  • Fischer, H. (2006). Digital shock. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
  • Fives, H., & Gregoire, M. (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108437
  • Floridi, L. (2015). The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6
  • Friesen, N. (2008). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths of E-learning. Ubiquity, 9(22), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/1403922.1386860
  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and method (original work published 1960). Bloomsbury.
  • García-Aretio, L. (2021). COVID-19 and digital distance education: Pre-confinement, confinement and post-confinement. RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.28080
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic literature reviews. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
  • Goetz, G. (2020). The odyssey of pedagogies of technoscientific literacies. Postdigital Science & Education, 3(2), 502–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00188-3
  • González, J. (2000). The interpretive paradigm in social and educational research. Cuestiones Pedagógicas Revista de Ciencias de la Educación, 15, 227–246. https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/Cuestiones-Pedagogicas/article/view/10155
  • Gros, B. (2019). Research on the participatory design of digital learning environments. Universidad de Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/144898
  • Gros, B., & Suárez-Guerrero, C. (Eds.). (2016). Pedagogía Red. Una educación para tiempos de internet. Octaedro.
  • Grussendorf, S. (2018). A critical assessment of the NMC Horizon reports project. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i1.722
  • Harmes, M. K., Huijser, H., & Danaher, P. A. (2015). Demythologizing teaching and learning in education: Towards a research agenda. In M. K. Harmes, H. Huijser, & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Myths in education, learning and teaching (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Hayes, S. (2015). Counting on use of technology to enhance learning. In P. Jandrić & D. Boras (Eds.), Critical learning in digital networks (pp. 15–36). Springer International Publishing.
  • Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2009). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
  • Jackson, N. J. (2014). The concept of learning ecologies. In N. Jackson & G. B. Cooper (Eds.), Life-wide learning, education and personal development (pp. 1–30). Lifewide Education Community.
  • Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2020). Postdigital We-Learn. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09711-2
  • Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoffy & S. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–33). University of Chicago Press.
  • Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In K. S. Abelly & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kirschner, P., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying new literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.314
  • Knox, J. (2019). What does the ‘postdigital’ mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science & Education, 1(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y
  • Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Routledge.
  • Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. Routledge.
  • Mayor, A. (2018). Gods and robots: Myths, machines, and ancient dreams of technology. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691185446
  • McKinney, S. (2014). The relationship of child poverty to school education. Improving Schools, 17(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214553742
  • Mosco, V. (2005). The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2433.001.0001
  • Njenga, J. K., & Fourie, L. (2010). The myths about e-learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x
  • Obradović, S. (2021). Myths. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of the possible (pp. 1–6). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ornellas, A., & Sancho, J. M. (2015). Three decades of digital ICT in education: Deconstructing myths and highlighting realities. In M. K. Harmes, H. Huijser, & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Myths in education, learning and teaching. Policies, practices and principles (pp. 135–150). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Ortoleva, P. (2021). Mitos de baja intensidad.: Relatos, medios de comunicación, vida cotidiana. Universidad de los Andes. https://doi.org/10.31179/facarqdis.01
  • Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Digital rights, digital citizenship and digital literacy: What’s the difference? Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.616
  • Pedró, F. (2012). Connected minds. Technology and today’s learners. OECD Publishing.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  • Raffaghelli, J. E. (2017). Does flipped classroom work? Critical analysis of empirical evidences on its effectiveness for learning. Form@re – Open Journal per La Formazione in Rete, 17(3), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.13128/formare-21216
  • Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015). Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12279
  • Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
  • Raynaud, D. (2018). What is technology? Editorial Laetoli.
  • Ricaurte, P. (2016). Pedagogies for the open knowledge society. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0033-y
  • Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
  • Rivera-Vargas, P., & Cobo, C. (2020). Digital learning: Distraction or default for the future. Digital Education Review, 37, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/cnrf6
  • Sancho-Gil, J., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2020). Moving beyond the predictable failure of ed-tech initiatives. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1666873
  • Saura, G., Díez Gutiérrez, E., & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2021). Innovación techno-educativa ‘Google’. Plataformas digitales, datos y formación docente. REICE, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.007
  • Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? John Wiley & Sons.
  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015
  • Stevenson, I. (2008). Tool, tutor, environment or resource: Exploring metaphors for digital technology and pedagogy using activity theory. Computers & Education, 51(2), 836–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.001
  • Suárez-Guerrero, C., Lloret-Catalá, C., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the digital transformation of the classroom through the use of tablets: A study in Spain. Comunicar, 49, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-08
  • Suárez-Guerrero, C., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Rebour, M. (2020). Preguntas educativas para la tecnología digital como respuesta. Edutec revista electrónica de tecnología educativa, 73(73), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.73.1733
  • Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202
  • Vercellone, F. (2020). Myth. In F. Vercellone & S. Tedesco (Eds.), Glossary of morphology (p. 82). Springer.
  • Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Gómez, S. C., & Van Den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0. The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC101254
  • Vydra, S., & Klievink, B. (2019). Techno-optimism and policy-pessimism in the public sector big data debate. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.010
  • Vygotsky, L., Cole, M., Jolm-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E. (1980). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  • Warschauer, M., & Ames, M. (2010). Can one laptop per child save the world’s poor? Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 33–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24385184
  • White, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171
  • Williamson, B. (2020). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556
  • Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
  • Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628645
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.