871
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Ambicultural blending between Eastern and Western paradigms: Fresh perspectives for international management research

, , &
Pages 304-320 | Received 13 Nov 2012, Accepted 28 Feb 2014, Published online: 15 Apr 2014

References

  • Alasuutari, P. 1995. Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  • Andrews, T., and N. Chompusri. 2001. “Lessons in Cross-Vergence: Restructuring the Thai Subsidiary Corporation.” Journal of International Business Studies 32 (1): 77–94. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490939
  • Apfelthaler, G., K. Hansen, S. Keuchel, M. Neubauer, S. H. Ong, N. Tapachai, and C. Mueller. 2005. “Cross-cultural Learning Styles in Higher Education.” International Journal of Learning 12 (5): 247–256.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated and edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Translated and edited by C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Bedi, H. 1999. Understanding the Asian Manager. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
  • Bhagat, R. S., A. S. McDevitt, and I. McDevitt. 2010. “On Improving the Robustness of Asian Management Theories: Theoretical Anchors in the Era of Globalization.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 27: 179–192. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9158-z
  • Birkinshaw, J., M.-Y. Brannen, and R. L. Tung. 2011. “From a Distance and Generalizable to up close and Grounded: Reclaiming a Place for Qualitative Methods in International Business Research.” Journal of International Business Studies 42 (5): 573–581. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.19
  • Boode, G. 2005. “Boundaries on the Move: The Impact of Cultural Values on Organizational Design and Communication within an Organization within Thailand.” Asia Pacific Business Review 11 (4): 519–533. doi: 10.1080/13602380500135802
  • Caicedo, M. H. 2011. “The Story of US: On the Nexus between Metaphor and Story in Writing of Scientific Articles.” Culture and Organization 17 (5): 403–416. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2011.622902
  • Cameron, K. S., and R. E. Quinn. 1988. “Organizational Paradox and Transformation.” In Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, edited by R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron, 1–14. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
  • Chae, B., and J. M. Bloodgood. 2006. “The Paradoxes of Knowledge Management: An Eastern Philosophical Perspective.” Information and Organization 16 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.06.003
  • Chantornvong, S. 1992. “To Address the Dust of the Dust Under the Soles of the Royal Feet: A Reflection on the Political Dimension of the Thai Court Language.” Asian Review 6: 145–163.
  • Chen, M. J. 2002. “Transcending Paradox: The Chinese Middle Way Perspective.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19 (2/3): 179–199. doi: 10.1023/A:1016235517735
  • Chen, C. C., Y. R. Chen, and K. Xin. 2004. “Guanxi Practices and Trust in Management: A Procedural Justice Perspective.” Organization Science 15 (2): 200–209. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0047
  • Chen, C., and L. Godkin. 2001. “Mianzi Guanxi and Western Prospects in China.” International Journal of Management 18 (2): 139–147.
  • Chen, M. J., and D. Miller. 2010. “West Meets East: Towards an Ambicultural Approach to Management.” Academy of Management Perspectives 24 (4): 17–24. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2010.24.4.3651479.a
  • Cheng, C. 1987. “Chinese Philosophy and Contemporary Human Communication Theory.” In Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives, edited by D. Lawrence, 23–40. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Chia, R. 2003. “From Knowledge-creation to the Perfecting of Action: Tao Basho and Pure Experience as the Ultimate Ground of Knowing.” Human Relations 56 (8): 953–981. doi: 10.1177/00187267030568003
  • Clegg, S. R., J. Cunha, and M. Cunha. 2002. “Management Paradoxes: A Relational View.” Human Relations 55 (5): 483–503. doi: 10.1177/0018726702555001
  • Corley, K. G., and D. A. Gioia. 2011. “Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?” Academy of Management Review 36 (1): 12–32. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.55662499
  • Cornelissen, J. P., and R. Durand. 2012. “More than just Novelty: Conceptual Blending and Causality.” Academy of Management Review 37 (1): 152–154.
  • Cummings, S., and D. Wilson. 2003. “Images of Strategy.” In Images of Strategy, edited by S. Cummings and D. Wilson, 1-40. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Deleuze, G. 1968/1994. Différence et Repetition. Paris, 1968. Difference and Repetition Translated and edited by Paul Patton 1994. New York: Colombia University Press.
  • Denison, D. R., R. Hooijberg, and R. E. Quinn. 1995. “Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership.” Organization Science 6 (5): 524–540. doi: 10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
  • Dijksterhuis, A. 2004. “Think Different: The Merits of Unconscious Thought in Preference Development and Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (5): 586–598. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.586
  • Eisenhardt, K. 2000. “Paradox Spirals Ambivalence: The New Language of Change and Pluralism.” Academy of Management Review 25 (4): 703–705. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2000.3707694
  • Emmett, E. 1991. Learning to Philosophise. Harmonsworth, UK: Penguin.
  • Fang, T. 2010. “Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and Beyond.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 27 (1): 155–170. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9134-7
  • Fang, T., and G. O. Faure. 2011. “Chinese Communication Characteristics: A Yin Yang Perspective.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35 (3): 320–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.06.005
  • Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gabriel, Y., D. Geiger, and H. Letiche. 2011. “The Marriage of Story and Metaphor.” Culture and Organization 17 (5): 367–371. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2011.622896
  • Hansen, C. 1996. “Duty and Virtue.” In Chinese Language Thought and Culture: Nivison and His Critics, edited by P. J. Ivanhoe, 173–192. Chicago and La Salle, Ill: Open Court.
  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values Behaviors Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. 2007. “Asian Management in the Twenty-First Century.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 24 (4): 411–420. doi: 10.1007/s10490-007-9049-0
  • Kainzbauer, A. 2010. “Perplexity in Southeast Asia: De-perplexing the Expat.” In Managing in Changing Times: A Guide for the Perplexed Manager, edited by S. Lowe, 345–364. India: Response Books.
  • Kemavuthanon, S., and J. Duberley. 2009. “A Buddhist View of Leadership: The Case of the OTOP Project.” Leadership and Organization Development Journal 30 (8): 737–758. doi: 10.1108/01437730911003902
  • Komin, S. 1991. Psychology of the Thai People. 2nd ed. Bangkok, Thailand: National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA).
  • Komin, S. 1999. “The Thai Concept of Effective Leadership.” In Management and Cultural Values: The Indigenization of Organizations in Asia, edited by H. S. R. Kao, D. Sinha, and B. Wilpert, 265–286. New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.
  • Lee, M. Y., and P. Ellis. 2000. “Insider-outsider Perspectives of Guanxi.” Business Horizons 43 (1): 25–30. doi: 10.1016/S0007-6813(00)87384-X
  • Lessem, R., and S. Palsule. 1997. Managing in Four Worlds: From Competition to Co-Creation. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Leung, K. 2006. “The Rise of East Asia: Implications for Research on Cultural Variations and Globalization.” Journal of International Management 12 (2): 235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2006.02.004
  • Lewis, M. W. 2000. “Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide.” Academy of Management Review 25 (4): 760–776.
  • Lewis, M. W., and A. J. Grimes. 1999. “Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 672–690.
  • Li, P. P. 2012. “Toward an Integrative Framework of Indigenous Research: The Geocentric Implications of Yin-Yang Balance.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 29 (4): 849–872. doi: 10.1007/s10490-011-9250-z
  • Lowe, S. 2003. “Chinese Culture and Management Theory.” In Chinese Culture Organizational Behavior and International Business Management, edited by I. Alon, 3–26. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishers.
  • Lowe, S, ed. 2010. Managing in Changing Times: A Guide for the Perplexed Manager. India: Response Books.
  • Lowe, S., A. Carr, and F. Moore. 2007. “Paradigmapping Studies of Culture and Organization.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 7 (2): 237–250. doi: 10.1177/1470595807079389
  • McSweeney, B. 2009. “Dynamic Diversity: Variety and Variation within Countries.” Organization Studies 30 (9): 933–957. doi: 10.1177/0170840609338983
  • Meyer, K. E. 2006. “Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 23 (2): 119–137. doi: 10.1007/s10490-006-7160-2
  • Mintzberg, H. 2001. “The Yin and the Yang of Managing.” Organizational Dynamics 29 (4): 306–312. doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00035-3
  • Niffenegger, P., S. Kulviwat, and N. Engchanil. 2006. “Conflicting Cultural Imperatives in Modern Thailand: Global Perspective.” Asia Pacific Business Review 12 (4): 403–420. doi: 10.1080/13602380600571211
  • Nisbett, R. E. 2003. The Geography of Thought. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
  • Nonaka, I., and Z. Zhu. 2012. Pragmatic Strategy: Eastern Wisdom Global Success. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • van Norden, B. W. 1996. “What Should Western Philosophy Learn from Chinese Philosophy.” In Chinese Language Thought and Culture: Nivison and his Critics, edited by P. J. Ivanhoe, 224–229. Chicago and La Salle, Ill: Open Court.
  • Okhuysen, G., and J.-P. Bonardi. 2011. “Editor's Comments: The Challenges of Building Theory by Combining Lenses.” Academy of Management Review 36 (1): 6–11. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.55662498
  • Osland, J. S., and A. Bird. 2000. “Beyond Sophisticated Stereotyping: Cultural Sensemaking in Context.” The Academy of Management Executive 14 (1): 65–77.
  • Oswick, C., P. Fleming, and G. Hanlon. 2011. “From Borrowing to Blending: Rethinking the Process of Organizational Theory Building.” Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 318–337. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330932
  • Parboteeah, K. P., Y. Paik, and J. B. Cullen. 2009. “Religious Groups and Work Values: A Focus on Buddhism Christianity Hinduism and Islam.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 9 (1): 51–67. doi: 10.1177/1470595808096674
  • Patterson, P. G., and T. Smith. 2001. “Relationship Benefits in Service Industries: A Replication in a Southeast Asian Context.” Journal of Services Marketing 15 (6): 425–443. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006098
  • Patton, J. 2003. “Intuition in Decisions.” Management Decision 41 (10): 989–996. doi: 10.1108/00251740310509517
  • Primecz, H., L. Romani, and S. Sackmann. 2009. “Multiple Perspectives in Cross-cultural Management.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 9 (3): 267–274. doi: 10.1177/1470595809346603
  • Redding, G. 1993. The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Riad, S. 2011. “Terms of Engagement: On the Differential Effects of Metaphoric Utterances in Relational Stories of Organization.” Culture and Organization 17 (5): 373–388. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2011.622897
  • Roland, A. 1988. In Search of Self in India and Japan: Toward a Cross-cultural Psychology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Samson, A. 2004. “Contradictions in Counter-intuitive Beliefs and Naïve Dialecticism.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 4 (2): 373–390. doi: 10.1163/1568537041725114
  • Schultz, M., and M. J. Hatch. 1996. “Living with Multiple Paradigms: The Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies.” Academy of Management Review 21 (2): 529–557.
  • Schwartz, S. H. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by M. Zanna, Vol. 25, 1–65. New York: Academic Press.
  • Schwartz, S. H. 1994. “Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values.” In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory Method and Applications, edited by U. Kim et al., 85–119. Sage.
  • Shotter, J. 2008. “Dialogism and Polyphony in Organizing Theorizing in Organization Studies. Action Guiding Anticipations and the Continuous Creation of Novelty.” Organization Studies 29 (4): 501–524. doi: 10.1177/0170840608088701
  • Siddiqui, M. 2005. Corporate Soul: The Monk within the Manager. London: Sage.
  • Sinha, D., H. S. R. Kao, and B. Wilpert. 1999. “Introduction: The Emergence of Indigenization.” In Management and Cultural Values: The Indigenization of Organizations in Asia, edited by H. S. R. Kao, D. Sinha, and B. Wilpert, 19–26. New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.
  • Srijumpa, R., M. Speece, and H. Paul. 2002. “Satisfaction Drivers for Internet Service Technology Among Stock Brokerage Customers in Thailand.” Journal of Financial Services Marketing 6 (3): 240–253. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4770055
  • Strauss, C., and N. Quinn. 1997. A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tenzin Gyatso (His Holiness the Dalai Lama). 1999. Ancient Wisdom Modern World: Ethics for the New Millennium. London: Abacus.
  • The Nation Newspaper. 2008. “Firm Takes Principled Path to Success.” The Nation Newspaper, October 17. 10a.
  • Thompson, A. 1989. “Cross-cultural Management of Labour in a Thai Environment.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 6 (2): 323–338. doi: 10.1007/BF01733772
  • Tsui, A. S. 2004. “Contributing to Global Management Knowledge: A Case for High Quality Indigenous Research.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 21 (4): 491–513. doi: 10.1023/B:APJM.0000048715.35108.a7
  • Tung, R. L. 1994. “Strategic Management Thought in East Asia.” Organisational Dynamics 22 (4): 55–65. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(94)90078-7
  • Van de Ven, A., and M. S. Poole. 1988. “Paradoxical Requirements for a Theory of Change.” In Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, edited by R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron, 19–64. Cambridge, MA.
  • Wah, S. 2001. “Chinese Cultural Values and their Implication to Chinese Management.” Singapore Management Review 23 (2): 75–84.
  • Weick, K. 2001. “The Attitude of Wisdom: Ambivalence as the Optimal Compromise.” In Making Sense of the Organization, edited by K. Weick, 361–379. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Westwood, R. 2001. “Appropriating the other in the Discourses of Comparative Management.” In The Language of Organizations, edited by S. Linstead and R. Westwood, 241–282. London: Sage.
  • Wozniak, A. 2006. “Managerial Intuition Across Cultures: Beyond a West-East Dichotomy.” Education and Training 48 (2/3): 84–96. doi: 10.1108/00400910610651737
  • Yeung, I. Y. M., and R. L. Tung. 1996. “Achieving Business Success in Confucian Societies: The Importance of Guanxi (Connections).” Organisational Dynamics 25 (2): 54–66. doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(96)90025-X
  • Yuan, R. 1997. “Yin/Yang Principle and the Relevance of Externalism and Paralogic Rhetoric to Intercultural Communication.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 11 (3): 297–320. doi: 10.1177/1050651997011003004
  • Yucongdi, V. 2010. “A Study of Thai Employees’ Preferred Leadership Style.” Asia Pacific Business Review 16 (1/2): 161–181. doi: 10.1080/13602380903168962

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.