Performing as a professional: shaping migrant integration policy in adverse times

References

• Bruquetas-Callejo, M., B. Garcés-Mascareñas, R. Penninx, and P. Scholten. 2011. “The Case of the Netherlands.” In Migration Policymaking in Europe, edited by G. Zincone, R. Penninx, and M. Borkert, 129–164. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., and P. Scholten. 2012. “Deconstructing the Dutch Multicultural Model: A Frame Perspective on Dutch Immigrant Integration Policymaking.” Comparative European Politics 10 (3): 266–282. doi: 10.1057/cep.2012.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entzinger, H. 2014. “The Growing Gap between Facts and Discourse on Immigrant Integration in the Netherlands.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 21 (6): 693–707. doi: 10.1080/1070289X.2013.828616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essed, P., and K. Nimako. 2006. “Designs and (Co)incidents: Cultures of Scholarship and Public Policy on Immigrants/Minorities in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47 (3–4): 281–312. doi: 10.1177/0020715206065784
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2003. “Short Note: The Sociology of Professional Groups.” Current Sociology 54: 133–143. doi: 10.1177/0011392106057161
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, I. 2008. Governing Gaza: Bureaucracy, Authority, and the Work of Rule, 1917–1967. Boulder: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., and A. Gupta. 2002. “Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality.” American Ethnologist 29 (4): 981–1002. doi: 10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, V. 1999. “The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism.” The Sociological Review 47 (2): 280–307. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglerud, O. 2004. “Constructing Exclusion: The Micro-Sociology of an Immigration Department.” Social Anthropology 12 (1): 25–40. doi: 10.1017/S0964028204000023
   Google Scholar
• Ghorashi, H. 2009. “Antropologen en het multiculturele debat.” In Antropologie in een zee van verhalen. Amsterdam, edited by T. Sunier, 45–59. Amsterdam: Aksant.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 2012. Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. McC. 1995. “Putting Power in the Anthropology of Bureaucracy: The Immigration and Naturalization Service at the Mexico-United States Border.” Current Anthropology 36: 261–287. doi: 10.1086/204354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, C. 2010. “The Magic of the Populace: An Ethnography of Illegibility in the South African Immigration Bureaucracy.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 33 (1): 6–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1555-2934.2010.01090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, C. 2011. “Assembling Partial Perspectives: Thoughts on the Anthropology of Bureaucracy.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34 (1): 81–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, C., and M. Hull. 2017. A Review of the Anthropological Literature on Bureaucracy. Worldbank Group Policy Research Paper 8081. Washington: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, M. 2003. “The File: Agency, Authority, and Autography in an Islamabad Bureaucracy.” Language and Communication 23: 287–314. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00019-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, M. 2012. Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, J. 2014. “Policy Analysis and Policy Know-how: A Case Study of Civil Servants in England’s Department of Health.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17 (3): 286–304. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2014.919738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. 2013. Agenda Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2007. “From ‘Pure’ to ‘Hybrid’ Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains.” Administration and Society 39: 761–785. doi: 10.1177/0095399707304434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyqvist, A. 2011. “Sweden’s National Pension System as a Political Technology.” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by C. Shore, S. Wright, and D. Però, 205–221. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. 1974. “On Key Symbols.” American Anthropologist 75 (5): 1338–1346. doi: 10.1525/aa.1973.75.5.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. C., and B. Jenkins. 2005. Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, B. 2002. “The Nerve to Break Taboos: New Realism in the Dutch Discourse on Multiculturalism.” Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de L'integration et de la Migration Internationale 3 (3–4): 363–379. doi: 10.1007/s12134-002-1020-9
   Google Scholar
• Regeerakkoord VVD-CDA. 2010. Vrijheid en verantwoordelijkheid: Regeerakkoord VVD-CDA. [“Freedom and Responsibility: Government Coalition Agreement VVD-CDA”]. The Hague: Rijksoverheid [National Government].
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., P. ‘t Hart, and M. Noordegraaf, eds. 2007. Observing Government Elites. Up Close and Personal. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2007. Denken in een tijd van sociale hypochondrie: Aanzet tot een theorie voorbij de maatschappij. Kampen: Klement.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W., and M. Noordegraaf. 2011. “Professionalism as Symbolic Capital: Materials for a Bourdieusian Theory of Professionalism.” Comparative Sociology 10: 67–96. doi: 10.1163/156913310X514083
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. 2007. “European Integration in Anthropological Perspective: Studying the ‘Culture’ of the EU Civil Service.” In Observing Government Elites: Up Close and Personal, edited by R. Rhodes, P. ‘t Hart, and M. Noordegraaf, 180–205. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. 2011. “Espionage, Policy and the Art of Government: The British Secret Services and the War on Iraq.” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by C. Shore, S. Wright, and D. Però, 125–129. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houdt, F., S. Suvarierol, and W. Schinkel. 2011. “Neoliberal Communitarian Citizenship: Current Trends Towards “Earned Citizenship” in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands.” International Sociology 26 (3): 408–432. doi: 10.1177/0268580910393041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1922) 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated by Hans Gerth, A. M. Henderson, Ferdinand Kolegar, C. Wright Mills, Talcott Parsons, Max Rheinstein, Guenther Roth, Edward Shils, and Claus Wittich, edited by Günther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar