Alternative organization and neo-normative control: notes on a British town council

References

• Alvesson, Mats, and Stanley A. Deetz. 2000. Doing Critical Management Research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott. 2002. “Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual.” Journal of Management Studies 39 (5): 619–644. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm. 2015. “Lay-Offs in the Name of Love: The Danish Example.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 7 (1): 16–34. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2015.073123
   Google Scholar
• Barker, James R. 1993. “Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (3): 408–437. doi: 10.2307/2393374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, James, and William Rehg. 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, and Eve Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Nick, Casper Hoedemaekers, and Dimitrinka Russell. 2015. “The Comic Organization.” Ephemera 15 (3): 497–512.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, Catherine. 1999. “‘Come, Join Our Family’: Discipline and Integration in Corporate Organizational Culture.” Human Relations 52 (1): 155–178. doi: 10.1177/001872679905200109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney, George. 2014. “Alternative Organization and Alternative Organizing.” http://www.criticalmanagement.org/node/3182.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, edited by Alan Hamlin and Philip Petit, 17–34. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Contu, Alessia. 2008. “Decaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces.” Management Communication Quarterly 21 (3): 364–379. doi: 10.1177/0893318907310941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costas, Jana. 2012. “‘We Are All Friends Here’: Reinforcing Paradoxes of Normative Control in a Culture of Friendship.” Journal of Management Inquiry 21 (4): 377–395. doi: 10.1177/1056492612439104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges, Barbara. 1988. Ideological Control in Nonideological Organizations. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Daskalaki, Maria, and George Kokkinidis. 2017. “Organizing Solidarity Initiatives: A Socio-Spatial Conceptualization of Resistance.” Organization Studies 38 (9): 1303–1325. doi: 10.1177/0170840617709304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, Stanley A. 1992. Democracy in the Age of Corporate Colonialization. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeWalt, Kathleen M, and Billie R Dewalt. 2002. Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Wallnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, Susanne. 2015. “Critical and Compassionate Interviewing: Asking Until It Makes Sense.” In Critical Management Research: Reflections From the Field, edited by Emma Jeanes, and Tony Huzzard, 119–134. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, Amitai. 1964. Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, Alexander, Lotte Holck, Sara Louise Muhr, and Helena Liu. 2019. “Organizing Solidarity in Difference: Challenges, Achievements and Emerging Imaginaries” (Call for Papers in Organization). https://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/cmscontent/ORG/cfp_si_organization_organizing_solidarity_in_difference%20fin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Peter. 2005. “‘Kindergarten Cop’: Paternalism and Resistance in a High-Commitment Workplace.” Journal of Management Studies 42 (7): 1469–1489. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, Peter, and Andre Spicer. 2003. “Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance.” Organization 10 (1): 157–179. doi: 10.1177/1350508403010001376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, Peter, and André Spicer. 2004. “‘You Can Checkout Anytime, but You Can Never Leave’: Spatial Boundaries in a High Commitment Organization.” Human Relations 57 (1): 75–94. doi: 10.1177/0018726704042715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, Peter, and Andrew Sturdy. 2009. “‘Just Be Yourself!’: Towards Neo-Normative Control in Organisations?” Employee Relations 31 (6): 569–583. doi: 10.1108/01425450910991730
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Peter, and Andrew Sturdy. 2011. “‘Being Yourself ‘ in the Electronic Sweatshop: New Forms of Normative Control.” Human Relations 64 (2): 177–200. doi: 10.1177/0018726710375481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Jo. 1972. “The Tyranny of Structurelessness.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 17: 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2019. The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action Translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, John. 2015. “How Flatpack Democracy Beat the Old Parties in the People’s Republic of Frome.” The Guardian, May 22.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husted, Emil. 2020. “‘Some Have Ideologies, We Have Values’: The Relationship Between Organizational Values and Commitment in a Political Party.” Culture and Organization 26 (3): 175–195. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2018.1518325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, Danny L. 2015. “Participant Observation.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1–15. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Justesen, Lise, and Nanna Mik-Meyer. 2012. Qualitative Research Methods in Organization Studies. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1972. Commitment and Community: Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, Mads Peter, and Kaspar Villadsen. 2015. “Laughing for Real? Humour, Management Power and Subversion.” Ephemera 15 (3): 513–535.
   Google Scholar
• Kärreman, Dan, and Mats Alvesson. 2004. “Cages in Tandem: Management Control, Social Identity, and Identification in a Knowledge-Intensive Firm.” Organization 11 (1): 149–175. doi: 10.1177/1350508404039662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärreman, Dan, and Mats Alvesson. 2010. “Understanding Ethical Closure in Organizational Settings: The Case of Media Organizations.” In Ethics and Organizational Practice, edited by Sara Louise Muhr, Bent Meier Sørensen, and Steen Vallentin, 57–80. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinidis, George. 2015. “Spaces of Possibilities: Workers’ Self-Management in Greece.” Organization 22 (6): 847–871. doi: 10.1177/1350508414521098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, Dorinne. 1990. Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Gideon. 1992. Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 2005a. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 2005b. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by Francisco Panizza, 32–50. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2009. The Will of the Many: How the Alterglobalization Movement Is Changing the Face of Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, José Luis. 2017. “Pluralism and Consensus in Deliberative Democracy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (5): 556–579. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2017.1328089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy, Patrick, and Julie Uldam. 2014. “Connecting Participant Observation Positions: Toward a Reflexive Framework for Studying Social Movements.” Field Methods 26 (1): 40–55. doi: 10.1177/1525822X13500448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, Crysse. 2018. Frome Unzipped: From Prehistory to Post-Punk. Gloucester: Hobnob Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research: An International Quarterly 66 (3): 745–758.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Monika. 2017. “‘Brand-Centred Control’: A Study of Internal Branding and Normative Control.” Organization Studies 38 (7): 895–915. doi: 10.1177/0170840616663238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyland, Daniel. 2008. Organizational Ethnography. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Charles A., and Jennifer A Chatman. 1996. “Culture as Social Control: Corporations, Cults, and Commitment.” Research in Organizational Behavior 18: 157–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterman, Paul. 2006. “Overcoming Oligarchy: Culture and Agency in Social Movement Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (4): 622–649. doi: 10.2189/asqu.51.4.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Martin, George Cheney, Valérie Fournier, and Chris Land. 2014. “The Question of Organization: A Manifesto for Alternatives.” Ephemera 14 (4): 623–638.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Simon, and Martin Parker. 2017. “Antagonism, Accommodation and Agonism in Critical Management Studies: Alternative Organizations as Allies.” Human Relations 70 (11): 1366–1387. doi: 10.1177/0018726717696135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, Anna. 2016. “Management by Recognition: An Interactionist Study of Normative Control in Voluntary Work.” Doctoral dissertation at the School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, Francesca. 2002. Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reading, Nick. 2012. “What a Revolution in the Somerset Town of Frome Could Teach Our Political Class.” The Independent, November 13.
   Google Scholar
• Reedy, Patrick, Daniel King, and Christine Coupland. 2016. “Organizing for Individuation: Alternative Organizing, Politics and New Identities.” Organization Studies 37 (11): 1553–1573. doi: 10.1177/0170840616641983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, Juliane. 2018. “Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting Entrenched Inequalities in Occupy London.” Organization Studies 39 (9): 1299–1321. doi: 10.1177/0170840618759815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringel, Leopold. 2019. “Unpacking the Transparency-Secrecy Nexus: Frontstage and Backstage Behaviour in a Political Party.” Organization Studies 40 (5): 705–723. doi: 10.1177/0170840618759817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger, F. J., and W. J. Dickson. 1939. Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce. 1979. “The Collectivist Organization: An Alternative to Rational-Bureaucratic Models.” American Sociological Review 44 (4): 509–527. doi: 10.2307/2094585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rye, Danny. 2014. Political Parties and the Concept of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, Danny. 2015. “Political Parties and Power: A New Framework for Analysis.” Political Studies 63 (5): 1052–1069. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, Edward. 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staten, Henry. 1986. Wittgenstein and Derrida. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Neil, Christopher Land, and Steffen Böhm. 2014. “Anti-Leaders(hip) in Social Movement Organizations: The Case of Autonomous Grassroots Groups.” Organization 21 (6): 759–781. doi: 10.1177/1350508413480254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Frederick Winslow. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. London: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Thornborrow, Thomas, and Andrew D. Brown. 2009. “`Being Regimented’: Aspiration, Discipline and Identity Work in the British Parachute Regiment.” Organization Studies 30 (4): 355–376. doi: 10.1177/0170840608101140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, John. 1991. “The Smile Factory: Work at Disneyland.” In Reframing Organizational Culture, edited by Peter J. Frost, Larry F. Moore, Meryl Reis Louis, Craig C. Lundberg, and Joanne Martin, 58–76. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, Robert, and Allanah Johnston. 2012. “Reclaiming Authentic Selves: Control, Resistive Humour and Identity Work in the Office.” Organization 19 (6): 787–808. doi: 10.1177/1350508411422583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, William. 1956. The Organization Man. Philadelphia, PA: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wickert, Christopher, and Stephan M. Schaefer. 2015. “Toward a Progressive Understanding of Performativity in Critical Management Studies.” Human Relations 68 (1): 107–130. doi: 10.1177/0018726713519279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Yoash. 1982. “Commitment in Organizations: A Normative View.” Academy of Management Review 7 (3): 418–428. doi: 10.5465/amr.1982.4285349
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, Hugh. 1993. “Strength Is Ignorance; Slavery Is Freedom: Managing Culture in Modern Organizations.” Journal of Management Studies 30 (4): 515–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar