Design as redesign in the case of architectural competitions: the role of design visualisations and juries

References

• Ahuja, Sumati, Natalia Nikolova, and Stewart Clegg. 2017. “Paradoxical Identity: The Changing Nature of Architectural Work and its Relation to Architects’ Identity.” Journal of Professions and Organization 4 (1): 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, Stefan, Nils Brunsson, and Raimund Hasse. 2020. “Where Does Competition Come From? The Role of Organization.” Organization Theory 1 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bos-de Vos, Marina, J. W. F. Hans Wamelink, and Leentje Volker. 2016. “Trade-Offs in the Value Capture of Architectural Firms: The Significance of Professional Value.” Construction Management and Economics 34 (1): 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1980. “Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not: The Socio-Logic of Translation.” In The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Sociology of the Sciences A Yearbook, vol 4, edited by K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn, and R. Whitley, 197–219. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caven, Valerie, and Marie Diop. 2012. “Architecture: A ‘Rewarding’Career? An Anglo-French Comparative Study of Intrinsic Rewards in the Architecture Profession.” Construction Management and Economics 30 (7): 513–523.
   Google Scholar
• Chupin, Jean-Pierre. 2011. “Judgement by Design: Towards a Model for Studying and Improving the Competition Process in Architecture and Urban Design.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 27 (1): 173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Laurie, Adrian Wilkinson, John Arnold, and Rachael Finn. 2005. “‘Remember I’m the Bloody Architect!’ Architects, Organizations and Discourses of Profession.” Work, Employment and Society 19 (4): 775–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copenhagen Municipality. Carlsberg II, District Plan. http://humleby.dk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2016-12-21_lokalplan_t6-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, Barbara. 2007. Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Malmö: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, Boris, and Jennifer Whyte. 2007. “Beyond Words: Aesthetic Knowledge and Knowing in Organizations.” Organization Studies 28 (5): 689–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, Boris, and Jennifer Whyte. 2009. “Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as Epistemic Objects.” Organization Studies 30 (1): 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georg, Susse. 2015. “Building Sustainable Cities: Tools for Developing New Building Practices?” Global Networks 15 (3): 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoezen, Mieke, John van Rutten, Hans Voordijk, and Geert Dewulf. 2010. “Towards Better Customized Service Led Contracts Through the Competitive Dialogue Procedure.” Construction Management and Economics 28 (11): 1177–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Kamstrup, Andreas. 2017. Crowdsourcing and the Architectural Competition as Organisational Technologies. Frederiksberg. PhD diss., Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemian, Reza, and Magnus Rönn. 2009. “Finnish Architectural Competitions: Structure, Criteria and Judgement Process.” Building Research and Information 37 (2): 176–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, Martin, Kristian Kreiner, and Stewart Clegg. 2011. “The Value of Style in Architectural Practice.” Culture and Organization 17 (2): 139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, Kristian. 2007. “Constructing the Client in Architectural Competitions. An Ethnographical Study of Revealed Strategies.” Paper presented at The 23rd EGOS colloquium 2007, Crete, June 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, Kristian. 2009. “Architectural Competitions – Empirical Observations and Strategic Implications for Architectural Firms.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2–3): 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, Kristian. 2010. “Organizational Spaces: From ‘Matters of Fact’ to ‘Matters of Concern’.” In Organisational Spaces. Rematerializing the Workaday World, edited by Alfons van Marrewijk, and Dvora Yanow, 200–211. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, Kristian. 2012. “Organizational Decision Mechanisms in an Architectural Competition. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 36: 399–429.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, Kristian, Peter Holm Jacobsen, and Daniel Toft Jensen. 2011. “Dialogues and the Problems of Knowing: Reinventing the Architectural Competition.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 27 (1): 160–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: how to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1996. “On Actor-Network Theory: A few Clarifications.” Soziale Welt 47: 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2008. “A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design (with Special Attention to Peter Sloterdijk).” In Networks of Design Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society, edited by Jonathan Glynne, Fiona Hackney, and Viv Minton, 2–10. Falmouth, UK: Universal Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lipstadt, Hélène. 2003. “Can ‘Art Professions’ be Bourdieuean Fields of Cultural Production? The Case of the Architecture Competition.” Cultural Studies 17 (3–4): 390–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoni, Beatrice, and Leentje Volker. 2017. “Paradoxes and Management Approaches of Competing for Work in Creative Professional Service Firms.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 33 (1): 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Martin. 2015. “Vertical Capitalism: Skyscrapers and Organization.” Culture and Organization 21 (3): 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönn, Magnus. 2009. “Judgement in the Architectural Competition. Rules, Policies and the Dilemmas.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2–3): 52–66.
   Google Scholar
• Silberberger, Jan. 2012. “Jury Sessions as Non-Trivial Machines: A Procedural Analysis.” Journal of Design Research 10 (4): 258–268.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1973. “The Structure of Ill Structured Problems.” Artificial Intelligence 4 (3–4): 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skærbæk, Peter, and Kjell Tryggestad. 2010. “The Role of Accounting Devices in Performing Corporate Strategy.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (1): 108–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. 1979. Participant Observation. Orlando: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, David. 2011. “What’s Valuable?” In The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy, edited by Jens Beckert, and Patrik Aspers, 319–338. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strebel, Ignaz, and Jan Silberberger. 2017. “Introduction: Unpacking Architectural Competitions – Project Design and the Building Process.” In Architecture Competition: Project Design and the Building Process, edited by Ignaz Strebel, and Jan Silberberger, 1–28. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, Alexander. 2011. “The Architect’s Gaze: The Maintenance of Collective Professional Vision in the Work of the Architect.” Culture and Organization 17 (4): 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryggestad, Kjell, and Susse Georg. 2011. “How Objects Shape Logics in Construction.” Culture and Organization 17 (3): 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryggestad, Kjell, Chris Harty, and Peter Holm Jacobsen. 2019. “Bringing the Hospital Back In: Implications for Studying Organizations.” In Context in Action and how to Study it: Illustrations from Health Care, edited by Ninna Meier, and Sue Dopson, 104–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UCC/ Juul Frost Arkitekter. 2011a. Rumprogram. https://ucc.dk/sites/default/files/programoplaeg_output.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UCC/ Juul Frost Arkitekter. 2011b. Program oplæg: programmatisk disponering. https://ucc.dk/sites/default/files/programoplaeg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Våland, Marianne Stang. 2009. “End User Participation as an Input to Shape the Brief in Architectural Competitions – A Threefold Translation Process.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2–3): 108–122.
   Google Scholar
• Våland, Marianne Stang, and Susse Georg. 2018. “Spacing Identity: Unfolding Social and Spatial-Material Entanglements of Identity Performance.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 34 (2): 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wezemael, Joris. 2011. “Research on Architectural Competitions: Towards a Theory of Jury-Based Decision-Making.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 27 (1): 157–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wezemael, Joris E., Jan M. Silberberger, and Sofia Paisiou. 2011. “Assessing ‘Quality’: The Unfolding of the ‘Good’ – Collective Decision Making in Juries of Urban Design Competitions.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 27 (1): 167–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volker, Leentje. 2012. “Procuring Architectural Services: Sensemaking in a Legal Context.” Construction Management and Economics 30 (9): 749–759.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, Andrea, and André Spicer. 2008. “Is Actor Network Theory Critique?” Organization Studies 29 (4): 611–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaneva, Albena. 2005. “Scaling Up and Down Extraction Trials in Architectural Design.” Social Studies of Science 35 (6): 867–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar