Participatory interpretation: a way to overcome analytical challenges in organizational aesthetic research

References

• Alexandersson, Anna, and Viktorija Kalonaityte. 2018. “Playing to Dissent: The Aesthetics and Politics of Playful Office Design.” Organization Studies 39 (2–3): 297–317. doi:10.1177/0170840617717545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Ben, and James Ash. 2015. “Atmospheric Methods.” In Non-Representational Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research, edited by Philip Vannini, 34–51. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biehl-Missal, Brigitte. 2012. “Using Artistic Form for Aesthetic Organizational Inquiry: Rimini Protokoll Constructs Daimler’s Annual General Meeting as a Theatre Play.” Culture and Organization 18 (3): 211–229. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2011.634194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, David. 2010. “Passenger Mobilities: Affective Atmospheres and the Sociality of Public Transport.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (2): 270–289. doi: 10.1068/d3909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, Adrian, and Philip Hancock. 2003. Art and Aesthetics at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Creed, Douglas, Steven S. Taylor, and Bryant Ashley Hudson. 2019. “Institutional Aesthetics: Embodied Ways of Encountering, Evaluating, and Enacting Institutions.” Organization Studies 41 (3): 415–435. doi:10.1177/0170840619835254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Molli, Federica. 2019. “An Aesthetic Account of Space: A Report on Recent Developments in Organizational Research.” Studi Organizzativi 1: 38–63. doi:10.3280/SO2019-001002.
   Google Scholar
• De Molli, Federica, Jeanne Mengis, and Alfons van Marrewijk. 2019. “The Aestheticization of Hybrid Space: The Atmosphere of the Locarno Film Festival.” Organization Studies. doi:10.1177/0170840619867348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, Sara R. S. T. A., Todd H. Chiles, Carrie M. Duncan, and Denise M. Vultee. 2018. “The Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship: How Arts Entrepreneurs and Their Customers Co-Create Aesthetic Value.” Organization Studies 39 (2–3): 345–372. doi:10.1177/0170840617717548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evered, Roger, and Meryl Reis Louis. 1981. “Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: ‘Inquiry from the Inside’ and ‘Inquiry from the Outside’.” Academy of Management Review 6 (3): 385–395. doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4285776.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Ron. 2014. The Best Place to Work: The Art and Science of Creating an Extraordinary Workplace. New York: Perigee.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, Pasquale. 1996. “Exploring the Aesthetic Side of Organizational Life.” In Handbook of Organization Studies, edited by Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, and Walter R. Nord, 565–580. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, Philip. 2005. “Uncovering the Semiotic in Organizational Aesthetics.” Organization 12 (1): 29–50. doi: 10.1177/1350508405048575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, Douglas. 2002. “Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17 (1): 13–26. doi:10.1080/1472586022013734 doi: 10.1080/14725860220137345
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, Marjana, and Jerzy Kociatkiewicz. 2011. “City Festivals: Creativity and Control in Staged Urban Experiences.” European Urban and Regional Studies 18 (4): 392–405. doi: 10.1177/0969776411407810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpers, Wendelin. 2002. “Phenomenology of Aesthetic Organising – Ways Towards Aesthetically Responsive Organizations.” Consumption Markets & Culture 5 (1): 21–46. doi: 10.1080/1025386029003082
   Google Scholar
• Küpers, Wendelin. 2013. “A Phenomenology of Embodied Senses: The ‘Making’ of Sense in Organisational Culture.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 5 (4): 325–341. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2013.057399
   Google Scholar
• Linstead, Stephen, and Heather Joy Höpfl. 2000. The Aesthetics of Organization. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2002. “Sensations, Bodies, and the ‘Spirit of a Place’: Aesthetics in Residential Organizations for the Elderly.” Human Relations 55 (7): 861–885. doi: 10.1177/0018726702055007544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minahan, Stella. 2017. The Aesthetic Turn in Management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Margaret, Louise Grisoni, and Arthur Turner. 2014. “Dreaming Fairness and Re-Imagining Equality and Diversity Through Participative Aesthetic Inquiry.” Management Learning 45 (5): 577–592. doi: 10.1177/1350507613486425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2015. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, Anat, and Michael G. Pratt. 2013. Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ratiu, Dan Eugen. 2017. “The Aesthetic Account of Everyday Life in Organizations: A Report on Recent Developments in Organizational Research.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 47 (3): 178–191. doi: 10.1080/10632921.2017.1303413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riach, Kathleen, and Samantha Warren. 2015. “Smell Organization: Bodies and Corporeal Porosity in Office Work.” Human Relations 68 (5): 789–809. doi: 10.1177/0018726714545387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, Veronica M., and Maria K. E. Lahman. 2015. “Photo-Elicitation: Reflexivity on Method, Analysis, and Graphic Portraits.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 38 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2013.843073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusted, Brian. 2000. “‘Cutting a Show’: Grounded Aesthetics and Entertainment Organizations.” In The Aesthetics of Organization, edited by Stephen Linstead and Heather Joy Höpfl, 111–129. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Dvora Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Garima, and Pratima Bansal. 2019. “Cocreating Rigorous and Relevant Knowledge.” Academy of Management Journal 63 (2). doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortt, Harriet L., and Samantha K. Warren. 2017. “Grounded Visual Pattern Analysis: Photographs in Organizational Field Studies.” Organizational Research Methods 22 (2): 539–563. doi:10.1177/1094428117742495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano, Michael. 2016. “Disappearing into the Object: Aesthetic Subjectivities and Organizational Control in Routine Cultural Work.” Organization Studies 37 (5): 687–708. doi: 10.1177/0170840615626464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigliani, Ileana, and Davide Ravasi. 2018. “The Shaping of Form: Exploring Designers’ Use of Aesthetic Knowledge.” Organization Studies 39 (5–6): 747–784. doi:10.1177/0170840618759813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strati, Antonio. 1992. “Aesthetic Understanding of Organizational Life.” Academy of Management Review 17 (3): 568–581. doi: 10.5465/amr.1992.4282009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strati, Antonio. 1999. Organization and Aesthetics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strati, Antonio. 2000. “The Aesthetic Approach in Organization Studies.” In The Aesthetics of Organization, edited by Stephen Linstead and Heather Joy Höpfl, 13–34. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strati, Antonio. 2009. “Do You Do Beautiful Things? Aesthetics and Art in Qualitative Methods of Organization Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by David Buchanan and Alan Bryman, 230–245. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strati, Antonio. 2016. “Aesthetics and Design: An Epistemology of the Unseen.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies, edited by Raza Mir, Hugh Willmott, and Michelle Greenwood, 251–259. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Steven. 2002. “Overcoming Aesthetic Muteness: Researching Organizational Members’ Aesthetic Experience.” Human Relations 55 (2): 821–840. doi: 10.1177/0018726702055007542
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Steven. 2013. “Little Beauties: Aesthetics, Craft Skill, and the Experience of Beautiful Action.” Journal of Management Inquiry 22 (1): 69–81. doi:10.1177/1056492612441393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Steven, and Hans Hansen. 2005. “Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics.” Journal of Management Studies 42 (6): 1211–1231. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk, Alfons. 2009. “Corporate Headquarters as Physical Embodiments of Organisational Change.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 22 (3): 290–306. doi: 10.1108/09534810910951078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk, Alfons. 2011. “Aesthetic Experiences of Designed Organisational Space.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 4 (1): 61–77. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2011.041531
   Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk, Alfons, and Dvora Yanow. 2010. “Introduction: The Spatial Turn in Organisation Studies.” In Organizational Spaces. Rematerializing the Workaday World, 1–19. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vince, Russ, and Samantha Warren. 2012. “Participatory Visual Methods.” In Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges, edited by Gillisan Symon and Catherine Cassell, 275–295. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Samantha. 2002. “Show Me How It Feels to Work Here: Using Photography to Research Organizational Aesthetics.” Ephemera 2 (3): 224–245.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Samantha. 2009. “Visual Methods in Organizational Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by David Buchanan and Alan Bryman, 566–582. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Samantha. 2012. “Having an Eye for It: Aesthetics, Ethnography and the Senses.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 1 (1): 107–118. doi:10.1108/20466741211220705.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, Varda. 2011. “To Be (Alike) or Not to Be (at All): Aesthetic Isomorphism in Organisational Spaces.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 4 (1): 22–41. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2011.041529
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, Varda. 2012. “Open Spaces, Closed Boundaries: Transparent Workspaces as Clerical Female Ghettos.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 5 (1): 6–25. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2012.048589
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, Varda, and Michal Frenkel. 2011. “Organizational Aesthetics: Caught Between Identity Regulation and Culture Jamming.” Organization Science 22 (2): 503–521. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, Varda, and Michal Frenkel. 2015. “Spatial Work in Between Glass Ceilings and Glass Walls: Gender-Class Intersectionality and Organizational Aesthetics.” Organization Studies 36 (11): 1485–1505. doi: 10.1177/0170840615593583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, Rebecca, Gillian Symon, Helen Roby, and Petros Chamakiotis. 2018. “Who’s Behind the Lens? A Reflexive Analysis of Roles in Participatory Video Research.” Organizational Research Methods 21 (2): 316–340. doi:10.1177/1094428116669818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora, and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. 2014. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar