Organising spirit

References

• Acquier, A., T. Daudigeos, and J. Pinkse. 2017. “Promises and Paradoxes of the Sharing Economy: An Organizing Framework.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 125: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K. 2006. Nonprofit Organizations: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, D. 2010. “Neoliberal Restructuring, Activism/Participation, and Social Unionism in the Nonprofit Social Services.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39 (1): 10–28. doi: 10.1177/0899764008326681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E.P. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M., and V. Kostakis. 2014. Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2015. “‘Snowed in!’: Offbeat Rhythms and Belonging as Everyday Practice.” Sociology 49 (5): 955–969. doi: 10.1177/0038038515589299
   Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. 2013. “What is Aesthetic Engagement?” Contemporary Aesthetics 11. Accessed August 24, 2020. https://contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=684.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, N. 2013. “Aesthetic Engagement in the City.” Contemporary Aesthetics 11. Accessed August 24, 2020. https://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=683.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2016. Commoning as a transformative social paradigm. The Next System Project. Accessed August 24, 2020. https://thenextsystem.org/commoning-as-a-transformative-social-paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2003. The New Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, L. A., and P. D. Siplon. 2004. “Toward Nonprofit Organization Reform in the Voluntary Spirit: Lessons From the Internet.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33 (3): 435–457. doi: 10.1177/0899764004266021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannick, T., and D. Coghlan. 2007. “In Defense of Being “Native”: The Case for Insider Academic Research.” Organisational Research Methods 10 (1): 59–74. doi: 10.1177/1094428106289253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. 1992. Identité de la France: They Seem to use a Colon Before the Subtitle, Even if the Original Book Doesn’t Espace et Histoire. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. 2007. “Mutinous Eruptions: Autonomous Spaces of Radical Queer Activism.” Environment and Planning A 39 (11): 2685–2698. doi: 10.1068/a38385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, S. 2016. “Pursuing Urban Commons: Politics and Alliances in Community Land Trust Activism in East London.” Antipode 48 (1): 134–150. doi: 10.1111/anti.12168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, R. 1992. “Survival of the Nonprofit Spirit in a for-Profit World.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 21 (4): 391–410. doi: 10.1177/089976409202100406
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., C. Friese, and R. Washburn. 2018. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. E. 1977. “Evolving Alternative Organization Designs: Their Sociotechnical Bases.” Human Relations 30 (3): 261–273. doi: 10.1177/001872677703000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and C. Parnet. 1978. Dialogues. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Del Fa, S., and C. Vàsquez. 2019. “Existing Through Differantiation: A Derridean Approach to Alternative Organizations.” M@n@Gement 22 (4): 559–583.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, R. M., and D. Stea. 2017. Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior. New Brunswick. and London, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Duxbury, N., W. F. Gerret-Petts, and D. MacLennan. 2015. “Cultural Mapping as Cultural Inquiry: Introduction to an Emerging Field of Practice.” In Cultural Mapping as Cultural Inquiry, edited by N. Duxbury, W. F. Gerret-Petts, and D. MacLennan, 1–41. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eades, G. L. 2015. Maps and Memes: Redrawing Culture, Place, and Identity in Indigenous Communities (Vol. 76). Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
   Google Scholar
• el-Ojeili, C. 2014. “Anarchism as the Contemporary Spirit of Anti-Capitalism? A Critical Survey of Recent Debates.” Critical Sociology 40 (3): 451–468. doi: 10.1177/0896920512452023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1993. The Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and A. Kearns. 2001. “Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood.” Urban Studies 38 (12): 2125–2143. doi: 10.1080/00420980120087081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, V. 2013/4. “Commoning: On the Social Organisation of the Commons.” M@n@Gement 16: 433–453. doi: 10.3917/mana.164.0433
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, R. 2016. “Cultural Mapping as a Development Tool.” City, Culture and Society 7 (1): 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2015.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., J. Cameron, and S. Healy. 2013. Take Back the Economy. An Ethical Guide to Transforming our Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., J. Cameron, and S. Healy. 2016. “Commoning as a Postcapitalist Politics.” In Releasing the Commons, edited by A. Amin and P. Howell, 192–212. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges. The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of the Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. L., M. Vashchenko, and C. Davis. 2011. “Making a Place for Youth: Social Capital, Resilience, and Communities.” In Juvenile Justice: Advancing Research, Policy, and Practice, edited by F. T. Sherman and F. H. Jacobs, 245–266. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. 2005/1807. ÅNdens Fænomenologi. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, W. C. 2019. Ethnographic Inquiry and Lived Experience: An Epistemological Critique. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., and T. Adorno. ([1947] 1995). Oplysningens Dialektik: Filosofiske Fragmenter. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Husted, E. 2020. “‘Some Have Ideologies, we Have Values’: The Relationship Between Organizational Values and Commitment in a Political Party.” Culture and Organization 26 (3): 175–195. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2018.1518325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannotte, M. S. 2015. “Cultural Mapping in Ontario. Cultural Mapping as Cultural Inquiry.” In Cultural Mapping as Cultural Inquiry, edited by N. Duxbury, W. F. Gerret-Petts, and D. MacLennan, 99–116. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannotte, M. S. 2016. “Story-telling About Place: Engaging Citizens in Cultural Mapping.” City, Culture and Society 7 (1): 35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2015.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, F. 2008. De L’universel, du Commun, et du Dialogue Entre les Cultures. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. 2014. Art and Sustainability: Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity, vol. 25. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Karpantschof, R., and F. Mikkelsen. 2014. “Youth, Space, and Autonomy in Copenhagen: The Squatters’ and Autonomous Movement, 1963-2012.” In The City is Ours. Squatting and Autonomous Movements in Europe From the 1970s to the Present, edited by B. Van Der Steen, A. Katzeff, and L. Van Hoogenhuijze, 179–205. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koefoed, O. 2019. “Urban Nature as Transformed Practice: A Case of Multi-Dimensional Processing to Increase Public Value in Copenhagen.” Local Economy 34 (6): 525–544. doi: 10.1177/0269094219882670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koefoed, O., and A. F. Jensen. 2015. “Siteness – A New Regime of Education and Sustainability.” In Nature in Education, Philosophy of Education, edited by P. Kemp and S. Frølund, Vol. 3, 136–157. Zürich: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 2002. “Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations From Burning Man.” Journal of Consumer Research 29 (1): 20–38. doi: 10.1086/339919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulturstyrelsen. 2014. Fredningsværdier.
   Google Scholar
• Longley, A., and N. Duxbury. 2016. “Introduction: Mapping Cultural Intangibles.” City, Culture and Society 7 (1): 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2015.12.006
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, K. 1983. Ghost Dance. Paris: Channel Four Films.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2016. “This is not my Beautiful Biosphere.” In A Cultural History of Climate Change, edited by T. Bristow and T. H. Ford, 229–238. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2019. Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Murris, K., and V. Bozalek. 2019. “Diffraction and Response-Able Reading of Texts: the Relational Ontologies of Barad and Deleuze.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 32 (7): 872–886. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2019.1609122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, K. 1993. “How Native is a “Native” Anthropologist?” American Anthropologist 95 (3): 671–686. doi: 10.1525/aa.1993.95.3.02a00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. 2004. “Communities og Interpellerende Fællesskaber.” In Community Psykologi, edited by P. Berliner, 93–120. København: Frydenlund Grafisk.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2002. The Drama of the Commons. Washington: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M., G. Cheney, V. Fournier, and C. Land. 2014a. “The Question of Organization: A Manifesto for Alternatives.” Ephemera 14 (4): 623–638.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M., G. Cheney, V. Fournier, and C. Land. 2014b. The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S., and M. Parker. 2017. “Antagonism, Accommodation and Agonism in Critical Management Studies: Alternative Organizations as Allies.” Human Relations 70 (11): 1366–1387. doi: 10.1177/0018726717696135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M., and M. Ziethen. 2017. “Anvendt Filosofi som Transaktionel Filosofi: Om Intentioner, Funktioner, Relationer og Metoder i den Anvendte Filosofi.” In Anvendt Filosofi er Interaktionel Filosofi, edited by M. Ziethen, 152–197. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pfefferbaum, B., R. Horn, and R. Pfefferbaum. 2017. “A Conceptual Framework to Enhance Community Resilience Using Social Capital.” Clinical Social Work Journal 45 (2): 102–110. doi: 10.1007/s10615-015-0556-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Raffnsøe, S. 1996. Filosofisk æstetik. Jagten på den Svigefulde Sandhed. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reedy, P. 2014. “Impossible Organisations: Anarchism and Organisational Praxis.” Ephemera 14 (4): 639–658.
   Google Scholar
• Reedy, P., D. King, and C. Coupland. 2016. “Organizing for Individuation: Alternative Organizing, Politics and new Identities.” Organization Studies 37 (11): 1553–1573. doi: 10.1177/0170840616641983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüdig, W., and J. Sajuria. 2020. “Green Party Members and Grass-Roots Democracy: A Comparative Analysis.” Party Politics 26 (1): 21–31. doi: 10.1177/1354068818754600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. 2004. The State of Nonprofit America. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schanz, H. J. 2017. Ånd. Aarhus: Forlaget Klim.
   Google Scholar
• Shankman, P., A. Ágh, E. Bourguignon, D. E. Brintnall, J. R. Cole, L. Connor, and C. R. Farrer. 1984. “The Thick and the Thin: On the Interpretive Theoretical Program of Clifford Geertz [and Comments and Reply].” Current Anthropology 25 (3): 261–280. doi: 10.1086/203135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, J. 2012. “Testing the Hypothesis of Higher Social Capital in Rural Areas: the Case of Denmark.” Regional Studies 46 (7): 873–891. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.669471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefánsson, F. 2009. “Nationalromantik” in Nordisk Mytologi, 2nd ed. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, S. 2007. Cultural Mapping Toolkit. Vancouver: Creative City Network of Canada and 2010 Legacies Now. Accessed August 24, 2020. https://www.creativecity.ca/database/files/library/cultural_mapping_toolkit.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. 2012. Bernard Stiegler on Jacques Derrida, Hauntology, and “Ghost Dance”. Accessed August 24, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXQB7RFzoFM.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B., and Ars Industrialis. 2006. Réenchanter le Monde. La Valeur Esprit Contre le Populisme Industriel. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, V. 2010. Mapping Histories: Cultural Landscapes and Walkabout Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, G., and J. Sørensen. 2007. “There's More to the Picture Than Meets the eye: Measuring Tangible and Intangible Capital in two Marginal Communities in Rural Denmark.” Journal of Rural Studies 23 (4): 453–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 2017. From Alterglobalization to Occupy Wall Street: Neoanarchist Movements and the new Spirit of Capitalism. Diss. New York: New School.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K. D. 2019. “When I was a Swahili Woman: The Possibilities and Perils of “Going Native” in a Culture of Secrecy.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 48 (5): 674–699. doi: 10.1177/0891241618811535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2015. The Mushroom at the end of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A., A. S. Mathews, and N. Bubandt. 2019. “Patchy Anthropocene: Landscape Structure, Multispecies History, and the Retooling of Anthropology: An Introduction to Supplement 20.” Current Anthropology 60 (S20): S186–S197. doi: 10.1086/703391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A., H. Swanson, E. Gan, and N. Bubandt. 2017. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet. Monsters. Ghosts. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, M. 2011. “Community Resilience for Youth and Families: Facilitative Physical and Social Capital in Contexts of Adversity.” Children and Youth Services Review 33 (9): 1742–1748. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodovnik, Ž. 2013. A Living Spirit of Revolt: The Infrapolitics of Anarchism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1995/1905. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, R., and C. Williams. 2014. “Anarchist Economic Practices in a ‘Capitalist’ Society: Some Implications for Organisation and the Future of Work.” Ephemera 14 (4): 947–971.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar