Responsive professionalism in post-NPM reforms: the case of the Swedish police

References

• Abbott, A. 2005. “Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions”. Sociological Theory 23(3): 245–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, T. L., S. Clegg, G. Eyal, M. Reed, and M. Saks. 2020a. “Connective Professionalism: Towards (Yet Another) Ideal Type.” Journal of Professions and Organization, 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa013.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, T. L., I. Kirkpatrick, P. S. Tolberg, and J. Waring. 2020b. “From Protective to Connective Professionalism: Quo Vadis Professional Exclusivity?” Journal of Professions and Organization, 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa014.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., S. W. Kwon, and Ch. Heckscher. 2008. “Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community.” Organization Science 19 (2): 359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anteby, M., C. K. Chan, and J. DiBenigno. 2016. “Three Lenses on Occupations and Professions in Organizations: Becoming, Doing, and Relating.” Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 183–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A. 2003. “Sharing Meaning across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor.” Organization Science 14 (3): 312–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A., and D. E. Chung. 2018. “Latitude or Latent Control? How Occupational Embeddedness and Control Shape Emergent Coordination.” Administrative Science Quarterly 63 (3): 607–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., P. Van der Aa, and N. Van Gestel. 2010. “Professionals without a Profession? Redesigning Case Management in Dutch Local Welfare Agencies.” European Journal of Social Work 13 (4): 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, M. 2019. “Muddling through the Swedish Police Reform: Observations from a Neo-Classical Standpoint on Bureaucracy.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay069.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle Carbonell, K., R. E. Stalmeijer, K. D. Könings, M. Segers, and J. J. G. van Merriënboer. 2014. “How Experts Deal with Novel Situations: A Review of Adaptive Expertise.” Educational Research Review 12: 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thevénot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bos-de Vos, M., B. M. Lieftink, and K. Lauche. 2019. “How to Claim What Is Mine: Negotiating Professional Roles in Inter-Organizational Projects.” Journal of Professions and Organization 6: 128–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRÅ 2018:14. The Police’s Work with Police-Citizen Partnerships – Field Studies from Four Areas in Sweden. Stockholm: The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Bringselius, L. 2019. Kultur och värdegrundsarbete ur ett tillitsperspektiv. Report nr. 5, Tillitsdelegation, Regeringskansliet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., and K. Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. “Constructing Organizations: The Example of Public Sector Reform.” Organization Studies 21 (4): 721–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canales, R. 2011. “Rule Bending, Sociological Citizenship, and Organizational Contestation in Microfinance.” Regulation & Governance 5 (1): 90–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2007. “The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform.” Public Administration Review 67: 1059–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2011. “Democracy and Administrative Policy: Contrasting Elements of New Public Management (NPM) and Post-NPM.” European Political Science Review 3: 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBenigno, J., and K. C. Kellog. 2014. “Beyond Occupational Differences the Importance of Cross-Cutting Demographics and Dyadic Toolkits for Collaboration in a U.S. Hospital.” Administrative Science Quarterly 59 (3): 375–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVault, M., and L. McCoy. 2012. “Investigating Ruling Relations – Dynamics of Interviewing in Institutional Ethnography.” In The Sage Handbook of Interview Research – The Complexity of the Craft, edited by J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, and K. D. McKinney, 381–385. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D. 2013. Municipal Policing in the European Union: Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2003. “The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism: Occupational Change in the Modern World.” International Sociology 18 (2): 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2011. “A new Professionalism? Challenges and Opportunities.” Current Sociology 59 (4): 406–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, G. 2013. “For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic.” American Journal of Sociology 118 (4): 863–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., and B. T. Pentland. 2003. “Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change”. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (1): 94–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, V. 1999. “The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism." The Sociological Review 47 (2): 280–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, N. R. 2013. “Complex Transition and Uncertain Trajectories – Reflections on Recent Developments in Police Professionalism.” Journal of Workplace Learning 25 (6): 407–420.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, D., and D. Knights. 2006. “Challenging Dualism: Public Professionalism in ‘Troubled’Times.” Sociology 40 (2): 277–295.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, and K. D. McKinney. 2012. The Sage Handbook of Interview Research – The Complexity of the Craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, G. 1998. “Professionalism as Enterprise: Service Class Politics and the Redefinition of Professionalism.” Sociology 32 (1): 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, L. 2019. “Continuity and Change in Scandinavian Police Reforms.” International Journal of Police Science and Management 21 (4): 206–217.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Ch. 1991. “A Public Management for all Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huising, R. 2015. “To Hive or to Hold? Producing Professional Authority through Scut Work.” Administrative Science Quarterly 60 (2): 263–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, K. C. 2014. “Brokerage Professions and Implementing Reform in an Age of Experts.” American Sociological Review 79 (5): 912–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, K. C. 2019. “Subordinate Activation Tactics: Semi-Professionals and Micro-Level Institutional Change in Professional Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 64 (4): 928–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, I. 2016. “Hybrid Managers and Professional Leadership.” In The Routledge Companion to the Professions and Professionalism, edited by M. Dent, I. L. Bourgeault, J. L. Denis, and E. Kuhlmann, 175–187. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, I., and M. Noordegraaf. 2015. “Hybrid Professionalism: The Re-Shaping of Occupational and Organisational Logics.” In The Oxford Handbook on Professional Service Firms, edited by L. Empson, D. Muzio, J. Broschak, and B. Hinings, 92–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, P. and V. Lundgren Sørli. 2018. Politireformer. Idealer, Realiteter, Retorikk og Praksis [Police reforms. Ideals, realities, rhetoric, and practice]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Levina, N., and E. Vaast. 2005. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 29: 335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., C. Hardy, and T. B. Lawrence. 2004. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (5): 657–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Source Book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Minas, R., S. Wright, and R. van Berkel. 2012. “Decentralization and Centralization: Governing the Activation of Social Assistance Recipients in Europe.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 32 (5/6): 286–298.
   Google Scholar
• Neyroud, P. 2008. Past, Present and Future Performance: Lessons and Prospects for the Measurement of Police Performance. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 2(3): 340–348.
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2020. “Protective or Connective Professionalism? How Connected Professionals Can (Still) Act as Autonomous and Authoritative Experts.” Journal of Professions and Organization 7: 205–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., M. Van der Steen, and M. J. W. Van Twist. 2014. “Fragmented or Connective Professionalism? Strategies for Professionalizing the Work of Strategists and Other (Organizational) Professionals.” Public Administration 92 (1): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. 1990. “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms or Organization.” Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolandsson, B. 2017. “Justifying Coproduced Policeability: Restrained Creativity and New Modalities of (Dis)Agreements in the Swedish Police.” International Journal of Public Administration 40 (8): 684–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolandsson, B. 2020. “The Emergence of Connected Discretion - Social Media and Discretionary Awareness in the Swedish Police.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 15 (3): 370–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1997. Administrative Behaviour – A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2019:43. Med tillit följer bättre resultat – tillitsbaserad styrning och ledning i staten. Stockholm: Nordstedts Juridik AB.
   Google Scholar
• Statskontoret 2018:18. Ombildningen till en sammanhållen polismyndighet – Slutrapport. Stockholm: Statskontoret.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C., and J. Travis. 2011. Towards a New Professionalism in Policing. Harvard: Harvard Kennedy School Executive Session on Policing and Public Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. 2014. “In the Service of God and the Parish: Professional Ideologies and Managerial Control in the Church of Sweden.” Culture and Organization 20 (4): 307–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinkels, M., and T. van Meijl. 2020. “Performing as a Professional: Shaping Migrant Integration Policy in Adverse Times.” Culture and Organization 26 (1): 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpstra, J., and N. R. Fyfe. 2014. “Mind the Implementation Gap? Police Reform and Local Policing in the Netherlands and Scotland.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 15 (5): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpstra, J., N. R. Fyfe, and R. Salet. 2019. “The Abstract Police: A Conceptual Exploration of Unintended Changes of Police Organisations.” The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles 92 (4): 339–359.
   Google Scholar
• Terpstra, J., and R. Salet. 2019. “The Contested Community Police Officer: An Ongoing Conflict between Different Institutional Logics.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 21 (4): 244–253.
   Google Scholar
• Tyskbo, D. 2020. “A Hybrid Operating Room in the Making: Coordinating the Introduction and Use of New Technology.” Doctoral dissertation in Business Administration Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar