Workplace boredom as an empowering experience: a psychoanalytic reconceptualization of boredom and identity in organizations

References

• Alvesson, M., K. L. Ashcraft, and R. Thomas. 2008. “Identity Matters: Reflections on the Construction of Identity Scholarship in Organization Studies.” Organization 15 (1): 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaud, G. 2007. The desire for work: Work motivation viewed from a psychoanalytic perspective. 13th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaud, G., and S. Vanheule. 2007. “The Division of the Subject and the Organization: A Lacanian Approach to Subjectivity at Work.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 20 (3): 359–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghdadchi, A. 2005. “On Academic Boredom.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 4 (3): 319–324.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, S. 1954. Waiting for Godot. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benvenuto, B., and R. Kennedy. 1986. The Works of Jacques Lacan. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstein, A. 2009. “On Boredom: A Close Encounter with Encapsulated Parts of the Psyche.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 90 (3): 613–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley, S. 2018. “Biopolitical Metaphor: Habitualized Embodiment Between Discourse and Affect.” Body & Society 24(3): 95–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie, M. 1991. Lacan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D. 2018. “Identities in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies, 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618765014.
   Google Scholar
• Bruursema, K., S. R. Kessler, and P. E. Spector. 2011. “Bored Employees Misbehaving: The Relationship Between Boredom and Counterproductive Work Behavior.” Work & Stress 25 (2): 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camus, A. 1955. The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, B. J., P. Parker, and K. Inkson. 2010. “Evasion of Boredom: An Unexpected Spur to Leadership?” Human Relations 63 (7): 1031–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederstroem, C., and A. Spicer. 2014. “Discourse of the Real Kind: A Post-Foundational Approach to Organizational Discourse Analysis.” Organization 21 (2): 178–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. 1997. “It’s Boring: Notes on the Meaning of Boredom in Everyday Life.” Qualitative Sociology 20 (4): 465–475.
   Google Scholar
• Costas, J., and D. Kaerreman. 2016. “The Bored Self in Knowledge Work.” Human Relations 69 (1): 61–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L., F. Gao, and K. M. Thornburg. 2016. “Boredom in the Workplace: A new Look at an old Problem.” Human Factors 58 (2): 279–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. 2002. “Social Poetics as Management Inquiry: A Dialogical Approach.” Journal of Management Inquiry 11 (2): 128–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Abate, C. P. 2005. “Working Hard or Hardly Working: A Study of Individuals Engaging in Personal Business on the job.” Human Relations 58 (8): 1009–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2009. “Encountering the Arugula Leaf: The Failure of the Imaginary and its Implications for Research on Identity in Organizations.” Organization 16 (4): 487–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2016. “Making the Absent Subject Present in Organizational Research.” Human Relations 69 (3): 731–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2017. “Never Social and Entrepreneurial Enough? Exploring the Identity Work of Social Entrepreneurs from a Psychoanalytic Perspective.” Organization 24 (6): 715–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, J. D., A. Frischen, M. J. Fenske, and D. Smilek. 2012. “The Unengaged Mind: Defining Boredom in Terms of Attention.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (5): 482–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, S. 2013. “Fantasies About Work as Limitless Potential – how Managers and Employees Seduce Each Other Through Dynamics of Mutual Recognition.” Human Relations 66 (9): 1159–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, B. 2004. Lacan to the Letter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. D. 1993. “Boredom at Work: A Neglected Concept.” Human Relations 46 (3): 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P., and A. Sturdy. 2011. “‘Being Yourself’ in the Electronic Sweatshop: New Forms of Normative Control.” Human Relations 64 (2): 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frone, M. R. 1998. “Predictors of Work Injuries among Employed Adolescents.” Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 565–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Y. 1995. “The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity.” Organization Studies 16: 477–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, M. E. 2012. “Henri Lefebvre and the ‘Sociology of Boredom’.” Theory, Culture & Society 29 (2): 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemmill, G., and J. Oakley. 1992. “The Meaning of Boredom in Organizational Life.” Group & Organization Management 17 (4): 358–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein, L. 2005. Experience Without Qualities: Boredom and Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2018. Bullshit Jobs: A Theory. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, C. 1994. “Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline.” Sociology 28 (2): 479–497.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, N. 2007. “On Lacan and the Becoming-Ness of Organizations/Selves.” Organization Studies 28 (11): 1761–1773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., and A. Pilnick. 2007. “Knowing Bodies at Work: Embodiment and Ephemeral Teamwork in Anaesthesia.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1395–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoedemaekers, C. 2009. “Traversing the Empty Promise: Management, Subjectivity and the Other’s Desire.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 22 (2): 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoedemaekers, C., and A. Keegan. 2010. “Performance Pinned Down: Studying Subjectivity and the Language of Performance.” Organization Studies 31 (8): 1021–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, R. 2016. “Boredom and Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 37 (10): 1403–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, K. 2009. “Heeding the Stains: Lacan and Organizational Change.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 22 (2): 214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and C. A. Clarke. 2014. “: It’s a Bittersweet Symphony, This Life: Fragile Academic Selves and Insecure Identities at Work.” Organization Studies 35 (3): 335–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and C. A. Clarke. 2017. “Pushing the Boundaries of Amnesia and Myopia: A Critical Review of the Literature on Identity in Management and Organization Studies.” International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (3): 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., and A. D. Brown. 2007. “‘Ethics’ as a Discursive Resource for Identity Work.” Human Relations 60 (3): 497–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1977. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. London: Hoghart Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1988. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954–1955. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. 1999. Open Minded: Working out the Logic of the Soul. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loukidou, L., J. Loan-Clarke, and K. Daniels. 2009. “Boredom in the Workplace: More Than Monotonous Tasks.” International Journal of Management Reviews 11 (4): 381–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F., and S. Jex. 2015. “Workplace Boredom: An Integrative Model of Traditional and Contemporary Approaches.” Group & Organization Management 40 (2): 131–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, T. 2004. The end of Dissatisfaction? Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. 2012. “Lack and Jouissance in Hegemonic Discourse of Identification with the State.” Organization 20 (2): 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, J. F. 1981. “Boredom: Practical Consequences and a Theory.” Acta Psychologica 49: 53–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, I. 2005. “Lacanian Discourse Analysis in Psychology.” Theory & Psychology 15 (2): 163–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. 1993. On Kissing, Tickling, and Being Bored. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragland, E. 1996. “An Overview of the Real, with Examples from Seminar I.” In Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud, edited by R. Feldstein, B. Fink, and M. Jaanus, 192–211. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2005. “The Power of the ‘Imaginary’ in Disciplinary Processes.” Organization 12 (5): 621–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, D. F. 1959. “‘Banana Time’: Job Satisfaction and Informal Interaction.” Human Organization 18: 158–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soerensen, B. M., and S. Spoelstra. 2011. “Play at Work: Continuation, Intervention and Usurpation.” Organization 19 (1): 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. 2008. “Subjectivity and Organized Other: Between Symbolic Authority and Fantasmatic Enjoyment.” Organization Studies 29 (7): 1037–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, L. 2005. A Philosophy of Boredom. London, UK: CPT Anthony Rowe.
   Google Scholar
• Vanheule, S., A. Lievrouw, and P. Verhaeghe. 2003. “Burnout and Intersubjectivity: A Psychoanalytical Study from a Lacanian Perspective.” Human Relations 56 (3): 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghe, P. 2001. Beyond Gender. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vidaillet, B., and G. Gamot. 2015. “Working and Resisting When One’s Workplace is Under Threat of Being Shut Down: A Lacanian Perspective.” Organization Studies 36 (8): 987–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangh, M. 1975. “Boredom in Psychoanalytic Perspective.” Social Research 42 (3): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner, M., M. Windle, and A. Freeman. 2005. “Work Stress, Substance use, and Depression among Young Adult Workers: An Examination of Main and Moderator Effect Models.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 10: 83–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar