1,226
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Recent development of enterovirus A vaccine candidates for the prevention of hand, foot, and mouth disease

& ORCID Icon
Pages 819-831 | Received 26 Apr 2018, Accepted 07 Aug 2018, Published online: 22 Aug 2018

References

  • King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, editors. Virus Taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses: Ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses, family- picornaviridae.  San Diego: Elsevier; 2012. p. 855–880.
  • International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. ICTV 9th report. 2011. [cited 2018 Aug 18]. Available from: https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv-reports/ictv_9th_report/positive-sense-rna-viruses-2011/w/posrna_viruses/234/picornaviridae
  • Baggen J, Jan Thibaut HJ, Strating JRPM, et al. The life cycle of non-polio enteroviruses and how to target it. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(6):368–381.
  • Klein M, Chong P. Is a multivalent hand, foot, and mouth disease vaccine feasible? Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(11):2688–2704.
  • Mao Q, Wang Y, Bian L, et al. EV-A71 vaccine licensure: a first step for multivalent enterovirus vaccine to control HFMD and other severe diseases. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5(7):e75.
  • Ho M, Chen ER, Hsu KH, et al. An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(13):929–935.
  • McMinn PC. An overview of the evolution of enterovirus 71 and its clinical and public health significance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002;26(1):91–107.
  • Solomon T, Lewthwarte P, Perera D, et al. Virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis and control of enterovirus 71. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(11):778–790.
  • WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. A guide to clinical management and public health response for hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). 2011. [cited 2018 Aug 18]. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int/publications/PUB_9789290615255/en/
  • Lyu K, Chen R. Achievements, challenges and prospects for the development of broadly protective multivalent vaccines and therapeutic antibodies against hand, foot and mouth disease. Sci Bull. 2015;60:1305–1315.
  • Koh WM, Badaruddin H, La H, et al. Severity and burden of hand, foot and mouth disease in Asia: a modelling study. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1):e000442.
  • Liu CC, Chow YH, Chong P, et al. Prospect and challenges for the development of multivalent vaccines against hand, foot and mouth diseases. Vaccine. 2014;32(47):6177–6182.
  • Aswathyraj S, Arunkumar G, Alidjinou EK, et al. Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD): emerging epidemiology and the need for a vaccine strategy. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2016;205(5):397–407.
  • Chong P, Liu CC, Chow YH, et al. Review of enterovirus 71 vaccines. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(5):797–803.
  • Yee PTI, Laa Poh C. Impact of genetic changes, pathogenicity and antigenicity on Enterovirus- A71 vaccine development. Virology. 2017 Jun;506:121–129.
  • Chou AH, Liu CC, Chang JY, et al. Formalin-inactivated EV71 vaccine candidate induced cross-neutralizing antibody responses against subgenotypes B1, B4, B5 and C4A in adult volunteers. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79783.
  • Liu CC, Hwang CS, Yang WS, et al. Long-term immunogenicity studies of formalin-inactivated enterovirus 71 whole-virion vaccine in macaques. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106756.
  • Chu SC, Wang ET, Liu DP. Is a monovalent vaccine against enterovirus 71 sufficient? A review of enterovirus 71 vaccine development based on enterovirus surveillance in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112(9):508–509.
  • Sickles GM, Mutterer M, Feorino P, et al. Recently classified types of Coxsackie virus, group A; behavior in tissue culture. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1955;90(2):529–531.
  • Mao Q, Wang Y, Yao X, et al. Coxsackievirus A16: epidemiology, diagnosis and vaccine. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(2):360–367.
  • Yip CCY, Lau SKP, Woo PCY, et al. Human enterovirus 71 epidemics: what’s next? Emerg Health Threats J. 2013;6:19780.
  • Lu QB, Zhang XA, Wo Y, et al. Circulation of coxsackievirus A10 and A6 in hand-foot-mouth disease in China, 2009–2011. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52073.
  • Wei SH, Huang YP, Liu MC, et al. An outbreak of coxsackievirus A6 hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with onychomadesis in Taiwan, 2010. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:346.
  • Downing C, Ramirez-Fort MK, Doan HQ, et al. Coxsackievirus A6 associated hand, foot and mouth disease in adults: clinical presentation and review of the literature. J Clin Virol. 2014;60(4):381–386.
  • Chung WH, Shih SR, Chang CF, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of coxsackievirus a6 new variant induced widespread mucocutaneous bullous reactions mimicking severe cutaneous adverse reactions. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(12):1968–1978.
  • Kaminska K, Martinetti G, Lucchini R, et al. Coxsackievirus A6 and hand, foot and mouth disease: three case reports of familial child-to-immunocompetent adult transmission and a literature review. Case Rep Dermatol. 2013;5(2):203–209.
  • Tseng FC, Huang HC, Chi CY, et al. Epidemiological survey of enterovirus infections occurring in Taiwan between 2000 and 2005: analysis of sentinel physician surveillance data. J Med Virol. 2007;79(12):1850–1860.
  • Lo SH, Huang YC, Huang CG, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic features of Coxsackievirus A6 infection in children in northern Taiwan between 2004 and 2009. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44(4):252–257.
  • Ang LW, Koh BK, Chan KP, et al. Epidemiology and control of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore, 2001–2007. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009;38(2):106–112.
  • Gaunt E, Harvala H, Österback R, et al. Genetic characterization of human coxsackievirus A6 variants associated with atypical hand, foot and mouth disease: a potential role of recombination in emergence and pathogenicity. J Gen Virol. 2015;96(Pt 5):1067–1079.
  • Yang Q, Ding J, Cao J, et al. Epidemiological and etiological characteristics of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Wuhan, China from 2012 to 2013: outbreaks of coxsackieviruses A10. J Med Virol. 2015;87(6):954–960.
  • Oberste MS, Peñaranda S, Maher K, et al. Complete genome sequences of all members of the species human enterovirus A. J Gen Virol. 2004;85(Pt 6):1597–1607.
  • Bessaud M, Razafindratsimandresy R, Nougairède A, et al. Molecular comparison and evolutionary analyses of VP1 nucleotide sequences of new African human enterovirus 71 isolates reveal a wide genetic diversity. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90624.
  • Mizuta K, Abiko C, Aoki Y, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Coxsackievirus A16 strains isolated from children in Yamagata, Japan between 1988 and 2011. Microbiol Immunol. 2013;57(5):400–405.
  • Zhang C, Zhu R, Yang Y, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the major causative agents of hand, foot and mouth disease in Suzhou City, Jiangsu province, China, in 2012–2013. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2015;4(2):e12.
  • Xu M, Su L, Cao L, et al. Genotypes of the enterovirus causing hand foot and mouth disease in Shanghai, China, 2012–2013. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138514.
  • Yu W, Xu H, Yin C. Molecular epidemiology of human coxsackievirus A16 strains. Biomed Rep. 2016;4(6):761–764.
  • Hu YF, Yang F, Du J, et al. Complete genome analysis of coxsackievirus A2, A4, A5, and A10 strains isolated from hand, foot, and mouth disease patients in China revealing frequent recombination of human enterovirus A. J Clin. 2011;49(7):2426–2434.
  • Zhang T, Du J, Xue Y, et al. Epidemics and frequent recombination within species in outbreaks of human enterovirus B-associated hand, foot and mouth disease in Shandong China in 2010 and 2011. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67157.
  • Liu VV, Wu S, Xiong Y, et al. Co-circulation and genomic recombination of coxsackievirus A16 and enterovirus 71 during a large outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease in central China. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e96051.
  • Feng X, Guan W, Guo Y, et al. A novel recombinant lineage’s contribution to the outbreak of coxsackievirus A6-associated hand, foot and mouth disease in Shanghai, China, 2012–2013. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11700.
  • Liang ZL, Mao Q, Gao F, et al. Progress on the research and development of human enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccines. Front Med. 2013;7:111–121.
  • Cheng A, Fung CP, Liu CC, et al. A phase 1, randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of enterovirus 71 vaccine. Vaccine. 2013;31(20):2471–2476.
  • China Food and Drug Administration. Announcement on licensed drugs approved. 2016. No.4. 2016-Jan-15 [cited 2018 Aug 18]. Available from: http://samr.cfda.gov.cn/WS01/CL0087/142000.html; 2016. No.5. 2017-Jan-05, [cited 2018 Aug 18]. Available from: http://samr.cfda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1283/168353.html; 2017. No.21. 2017-Mar-22 [cited 2018 Aug 18]. Available from: http://www.hubfda.gov.cn/zxbw/gztz/eslb/30764.htm.
  • Jin P, Li J, Zhang X, et al. Validation and evaluation of serological correlates of protection for inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in children aged 6–35 months. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(4):916–921.
  • Wei M, Meng F, Wang S, et al. 2-year efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of vigoo enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy Chinese children: a randomized open-label study. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(1):56–63.
  • Zhu W, Jin P, Li JX, et al. Correlates of protection for inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine: the analysis of immunological surrogate endpoints. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(9):945–949.
  • Hu Y, Zeng G, Chu K, et al. Five-year immunity persistence following immunization with inactivated enterovirus 71 type (EV71) vaccine in healthy children: A further observation. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(6):1517–1523.
  • Zhu F, Xu W, Xia J, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in China. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):818–828.
  • Li R, Liu L, Mo Z, et al. An inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in health children. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):829–837.
  • Mao Q, Wang Y, Gao R, et al. A neonatal mouse model of coxsackievirus A16 for vaccine evaluation. J Virol. 2012;86(22):11967–11976.
  • Chong P, Guo MS, Lin FH, et al. Immunological and biochemical characterization of coxsackievirus A16 viral particles. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49973.
  • Cai Y, Liu Q, Huang X, et al. Active immunization with a Coxsackievirus A16 experimental inactivated vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies and protects mice against lethal infection. Vaccine. 2013;31(18):2215–2221.
  • Yang E, Cheng C, Zhang Y, et al. Comparative study of the immunogenicity in mice and monkeys of an inactivated CA16 vaccine made from a human diploid cell line. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(5):1266–1273.
  • Li J, Chang J, Liu X, et al. Protection from lethal challenge in a neonatal mouse model by circulating recombinant form coxsackievirus A16 vaccine candidates. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 5):1083–1093.
  • An W Q, Su Z G, Wen Pan R, et al. The immunogenicity and protection effect of the BPL-inactivated CA16 vaccine in different animal systems. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(3):628–639.
  • Shen C, Liu Q, Zhou Y, et al. Inactivated coxsackievirus A10 experimental vaccines protect mice against lethal viral challenge. Vaccine. 2016;34(41):5005–5012.
  • Lin CW, Liu CC, Lu TC, et al. Immunogenicity studies of bivalent inactivated virions of EV71/CVA16 formulated with submicron emulsion systems. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:670506.
  • Cai Y, Ku Z, Liu Q, et al. A combination vaccine comprising of inactivated enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 elicits balanced protective immunity against both viruses. Vaccine. 2014;32(21):2406–2412.
  • Sun S, Jiang L, Liang Z, et al. Evaluation of monovalent and bivalent vaccines against lethal enterovirus 71 and Coxsackie virus A16 infection in newborn mice. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(10):2885–2895.
  • Li M, Duan Y, Yang X, et al. Intradermal injection of a fractional dose of an inactivated HFMD vaccine elicits similar protective immunity to intramuscular inoculation of a full dose of an Al(OH)3-adjuvanted vaccine. Vaccine. 2017;35(30):3709–3717.
  • Yang L, Liu Y, Li S, et al. A novel inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine can elicit cross-protective immunity against coxsackievirus A16 in mice. Vaccine. 2016;34(48):5938–5945.
  • Caine EA, Fuchs J, Das SC, et al. Efficacy of a trivalent hand, foot, and mouth disease vaccine against enterovirus 71 and Coxsackieviruses A16 and A6 in mice. Viruses. 2015;7(11):5919–5932.
  • Liu CC, Guo MS, Wu SR, et al. Immunological and biochemical characterizations of Coxsackievirus A6 and A10 viral particles. Antiviral Res. 2016;129:58–66.
  • Wang J, Zhang Y, Zhang X, et al. Pathologic and immunologic characteristics of coxsackievirus A16 infection in rhesus macaques. Virology. 2017;500:198–208.
  • Xie ZH, Zhang YZ, Yan YS, et al. Preliminary study on recurrence with viruses causing hand foot and mouth disease. JI BING JIAN CE. 2013;28(9):735–739. Chinese.
  • Chung YC, Huang JH, Lai CW, et al. Expression, purification and characterization of enterovirus-71 virus-like particles. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(6):921–927.
  • Chung YC, Ho MS, Wu JC, et al. Immunization with virus-like particles of enterovirus 71 elicits potent immune responses and protects mice against lethal challenge. Vaccine. 2008;26(15):1855–1862.
  • Lin YL, Yu CI, Hu YC, et al. Enterovirus type 71 neutralizing antibodies in the serum of macaque monkeys immunized with EV71 virus-like particles. Vaccine. 2012;30(7):1305–1312.
  • Li HY, Han JF, Qin CF, et al. Virus-like particles for enterovirus 71 produced from Saccharomyces cerevisiae potently elicits protective immune responses in mice. Vaccine. 2013;31(32):3281–3287.
  • Ye X, Ku Z, Liu Q, et al. Chimeric virus-like particle vaccines displaying conserved enterovirus 71 epitopes elicit protective neutralizing antibodies in mice through divergent mechanisms. J Virol. 2014;88(1):72–81.
  • Tsou YL, Lin YW, Shao HY, et al. Recombinant adeno-vaccine expressing enterovirus 71-like particles against hand, foot, and mouth disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4):e0003692.
  • Yan Q, Wu L, Chen L, et al. Vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccines expressing EV71 virus-like particles elicit strong immune responses and protect newborn mice from lethal challenges. Vaccine. 2016;34(35):4196–4204.
  • Liu Q, Yan K, Feng Y, et al. A virus-like particle vaccine for coxsackievirus A16 potently elicits neutralizing antibodies that protect mice against lethal challenge. Vaccine. 2012;30(47):6642–6648.
  • Zhao H, Li HY, Han JF, et al. Virus-like particles produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae elicit protective immunity against Coxsackievirus A16 in mice. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(24):10445–10452.
  • Zhang C, Liu Q, Ku Z, et al. Coxsackievirus A16-like particles produced in Pichia pastoris elicit high-titer neutralizing antibodies and confer protection against lethal viral challenge in mice. Antiviral Res. 2016;129:47–51.
  • Shen C, Ku Z, Zhou Y, et al. Virus-like particle-based vaccine against coxsackievirus A6 protects mice against lethal infections. Vaccine. 2016;34(34):4025–4031.
  • Zhou Y, Shen C, Zhang C, et al. Yeast-produced recombinant virus-like particles of coxsackievirus A6 elicited protective antibodies in mice. Antiviral Res. 2016;132:165–169.
  • Zhang W, Dai W, Zhang C, et al. A virus-like particle-based tetravalent vaccine for hand, foot, and mouth disease elicits broad and balanced protective immunity. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):94.
  • Zhou Y, Zhang C, Liu Q, et al. A virus-like particle vaccine protects mice against coxsackievirus A10 lethal infection. Antiviral Res. 2018;152:124–130.
  • Gong M, Zhu H, Zhou J, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy study of insect cell-expressed enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus a16 virus-like particles provides a structural basis for vaccine development. J Virol. 2014;88(11):6444–6452.
  • Zhao H, Li HY, Han JF, et al. Novel recombinant chimeric virus-like particle is immunogenic and protective against both enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 in mice. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7878.
  • Xu L, He D, Yang L, et al. A broadly cross-protective vaccine presenting the neighboring epitopes within the VP1 GH loop and VP2 EF loop of enterovirus 71. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12973.
  • Tam PE. Coxsackievirus myocarditis: interplay between virus and host in the pathogenesis of heart disease. Viral Immunol. 2006;19(2):133–146.
  • Henke A, Jarasch N, Wutzler P. Vaccination procedures against Coxsackievirus-induced heart disease. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2003;2(6):805–815.
  • Park JH, Kim DS, Cho YJ, et al. Attenuation of coxsackievirus B3 by VP2 mutation and its application as a vaccine against virus-induced myocarditis and pancreatitis. Vaccine. 2009;27(13):1974–1983.
  • Zhang L, Parham NJ, Zhang F, et al. Vaccination with coxsackievirus B3 virus-like particles elicits humoral immune response and protects mice against myocarditis. Vaccine. 2012;30(13):2301–2308.
  • Liu CC, Chang HW, Yang G, et al. Development of a quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for monitoring the Enterovirus 71 vaccine manufacturing process. J Virol Methods. 2011;176(1–2):60–68.
  • Foo DG, Ang RX, Alonso S, et al. Identification of immunodominant VP1 linear epitope of enterovirus 71 (EV71) using synthetic peptides for detecting human anti-EV71 IgG antibodies in western blots. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(3):286–288.
  • Foo DG, Alonso S, Phoon MC, et al. Identification of neutralizing linear epitopes from the VP1 capsid protein of Enterovirus 71 using synthetic peptides. Virus Res. 2007;125(1):61–68.
  • Chang HW, Liu CC, Lin MH, et al. Generation of murine monoclonal antibodies which cross-neutralize human enterovirus genogroup B isolates. J Virol Methods. 2011;173(2):189–195.
  • Liu CC, Chou AH, Lien SP, et al. Identification and characterization of a cross-neutralization epitope of Enterovirus 71. Vaccine. 2011;29(26):4362–4372.
  • Kirk K, Poh CL, Fecondo J, et al. Cross-reactive neutralizing antibody epitopes against enterovirus 71 identified by an in silico approach. Vaccine. 2012;30(49):7105–7110.
  • Xu L, He D, Li Z, et al. Protection against lethal enterovirus 71 challenge in mice by a recombinant vaccine candidate containing a broadly cross-neutralizing epitope within the VP2 EF loop. Theranostics. 2014;4(5):498–513.
  • Lee H, Cifuente JO, Ashley RE, et al. A strain-specific epitope of enterovirus 71 identified by cryo-electron microscopy of the complex with fab from neutralizing antibody. J Virol. 2013;87(21):11363–11370.
  • Plevka P, Lim PY, Perera R, et al. Neutralizing antibodies can initiate genome release from human enterovirus 71. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(6):2134–2139.
  • Kiener TK, Jia Q, Meng T, et al. A novel universal neutralizing monoclonal antibody against enterovirus 71 that targets the highly conserved “knob” region of VP3 protein. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2895.
  • Jia Q, Ng Q, Chin W, et al. Effective in vivo therapeutic IgG antibody against VP3 of enterovirus 71 with receptor-competing activity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46402.
  • Jiang L, Fan R, Sun S, et al. A new EV71 VP3 epitope in norovirus P particle vector displays neutralizing activity and protection in vivo in mice. Vaccine. 2015;33(48):6596–6603.
  • Huang KY, Chen MF, Huang YC, et al. Epitope-associated and specificity-focused features of EV71-neutralizing antibody repertoires from plasmablasts of infected children. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):762.
  • Shi J, Huang X, Liu Q, et al. Identification of conserved neutralizing linear epitopes within the VP1 protein of coxsackievirus A16. Vaccine. 2013;31(17):2130–2136.
  • Chen J, Zhang C, Zhou Y, et al. A 3.0-angstrom resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure and antigenic sites of Coxsackievirus A6-like particles. J Virol. 2018;92(2):e01257–17.
  • Xu L, Zheng Q, Li S, et al. Atomic structures of Coxsackievirus A6 and its complex with a neutralizing antibody. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):505.
  • Dang M, Wang X, Wang Q, et al. Molecular mechanism of SCARB2-mediated attachment and uncoating of EV71. Protein Cell. 2014;5(9):692–703.
  • Wang X, Peng W, Ren J, et al. A sensor-adaptor mechanism for enterovirus uncoating from structures of EV71. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19(4):424–429.
  • Lee BY, Wateska AR, Bailey RR, et al. Forecasting the economic value of an enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine. Vaccine. 2010;28(49):7731–7736.
  • Li L, Yin H, An Z, et al. Considerations for developing an immunization strategy with enterovirus 71 vaccine. Vaccine. 2015;33(9):1107–1112.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.