Student perceptions of low-tech active learning and mastery of introductory biomechanics concepts

References

• Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., … Risley, J. S. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment programs (SCALE-UP) project. Reviews in Physics Education Research, 1. Retrieved from https://www.compadre.org/per/per_reviews/volume1.cfm?#Cite
   Google Scholar
• Brazeal, K. R., & Couch, B. A. (2017). Student buy-in toward formative assessments: The influence of student factors and importance for course success. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18, 1–10. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experience of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 23–33. doi:10.1177/1469787410387724
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 54, 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. H., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72, 835–838. doi:10.1119/1.1707018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 453–468. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8319–8320. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74. doi:10.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C. (2002). Common concerns about the force concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 30, 542–547. doi:10.1119/1.1534822
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., & Knudson, D. (2008). Student factors related to learning in biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 7, 398–402. doi:10.1080/14763140802233207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., & Knudson, D. (2018). Important learning factors in high- and low-achieving students in undergraduate biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 17, 361–370. doi:10.1080/14763141.2017.1347194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., Smith, J., Bohne, M., & Knudson, D. (2012). Factors related to students’ learning of biomechanics concepts. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41, 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2004). Biomechanics concept inventory: Version two. In M. Lamontagne, D. G. E. Robertson, & H. Sveistrup (Eds.) Proceedings of XXIInd International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 378–380). Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2006). Biomechanics concept inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 81–82. doi:10.2466/PMS.103.1.81-82
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2009). Significant and meaningful effects in sports biomechanics research. Sports Biomechanics, 8, 97–105. doi:10.1080/14763140802629966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2010). What have we learned from teaching conferences and research on learning in biomechanics? In R. Jensen, W. Ebben, E. Petushek, C. Richter, & K. Roemer (Eds.), Scientific proceedings of the 28th conference of the international society of biomechanics in sports (pp. 678–681) Marquette, MI: Northern Michigan University Retrieved fromhttps://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/4556/4243
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., Bauer, J., & Bahamonde, R. (2009). Correlates of student learning in introductory biomechanics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 499–504. doi:10.24.66/PMS.108.2.499-504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., Noffal, G., Bauer, J., McGinnis, P., Bird, M., Chow, J., … Abendroth-Smith, J. (2003). Development and evaluation of a biomechanics concept inventory. Sports Biomechanics, 2, 267–277. doi:10.1080/14763140308522823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centered learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’? Studies in Higher Education, 28, 321–334. doi:10.1080/03075070309293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. SAGE Open. doi:10.1177/2158244015573169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer, P. L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 9–30. doi:10.1177/1469787407074008
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D. A., Chapman, L., Czajka, C. D., Jones, J. P., Ryker, K. D., & Wiggen, J. (2017). Instructional utility and learning efficacy of common active learning strategies. Journal of Geoscience Education, 85, 604–625. doi:10.5408/17-249.1
   Google Scholar
• Messineo, M., Gaither, G., Bott, J., & Ritchey, K. (2007). Inexperienced versus experienced students’ expectations for active learning in large classes. College Teaching, 55, 125–133. doi:10.3200/CTCH.55.3.125-133
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. J., & Metz, M. J. (2014). A comparison of professional-level faculty and student perceptions of active learning: Its current use, effectiveness, and barriers. Advances in Physiology Education, 38, 246–252. doi:10.1152/advan.00014.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, H. I. (1996). Preparing students to participate in an active learning environment. Advances in Physiology Education, 15, S69–S77. doi:10.1152/advances.1996.270.6.S69
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, L. E., Howell, L. A., & Wischusen, W. (2016). Perceptions of active learning between faculty and undergraduates: Differing views among departments. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17, 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the literature. Journal of Engineering Research, 93, 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
   Google Scholar
• Riskowski, J. L. (2015). Teaching undergraduate biomechanics with just-in-time teaching. Sports Biomechanics, 14, 168–179. doi:10.1080/14763141.2015.1030686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M., & Coates, D. (2000). University students’ expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 309–323. doi:10.1080/03075070050193433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHAPE America – Society of Health and Physical Educators. (2018). Guidelines for undergraduate biomechanics [ Guidance Document] (4th ed.). Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.shapeamerica.org/uploads/pdfs/2018/guidelines/Guidelines-for-UG-Biomechanics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Ahluwalia, P. K., & Sharma, S. K. (2013). Student’s epistemological beliefs, expectations, and learning physics: An international comparison. Physics Education Research, 9, 010117. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2012). Discpline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in university science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. V., & Cardaciotto, L. (2011). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11, 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Soneral, P. A. G., & Wyse, S. A. (2017). A SCALE-UP mock-up: Comparison of learning gains in high- and low-tech active-learning environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16, 12. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streveler, R. A., & Meneske, M. (2017). Taking a closer look at active learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 186–190. doi:10.1002/jee.20160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. D., Cotner, S. H., Baepler, P. M., & Decker, M. D. (2008). A delicate balance: Integrating active learning into a large lecture course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7, 361–367. doi:10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, B., & Kernozek, T. (2017). Self-efficacy theory applied to undergraduate biomechanics instruction. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 20, 10–15. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, A. J. (2012). Exploring undergraduates’ perceptions of the use of active learning techniques in science lectures. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42, 80–87.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Short, J. L., … Eise, N. (2015). Using active learning strategies to shift student attitudes and behaviours about learning and teaching in a research intensive educational context. Pharmacy Education, 15, 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar