A tale of two instructional experiences: student engagement in active learning and emergency remote learning of biomechanics

References

• Abraham, L., Bird, M., Johnson, J., Knudson, D., Russell, P., Smith, D., & Strohmeyer, S. (2018). Guidelines for Undergraduate Biomechanics (4th ed.). SHAPE America.
   Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., Bonhmam, S. W., Dancy, M. H., & Risley, J. S. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment programs (SCALE-UP) project. Reviews in Physics Education Research, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bonem, E. M., Fedesco, H. N., & Zissimopoulos, A. N. (2020). What you learn is less important than how you do it: The effects of learning environment on student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 23, 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10984-019-09289-8
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Association for the study of higher Eduction.
   Google Scholar
• Campana, K., & Agarwal, N. K. (2019). The landscape of research on learning in low-tech environments. International Learning Sciences,120, 687–703. doi:10.1108/ILS-10-2019-0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experience of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 23–33. doi:10.1177/1469787410387724
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, A. J., Aragon, O. R., Chen, X., Couch, B. A., Durham, M. F., Bobrownicki, A., Hanauer, D. I., & Graham, M. J. (2016). Student buy-in to active learning in a college science course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, ar76. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, A. J., Chen, X., Bathgate, M., Frederick, J., Hanauer, D. I., & Grahm, M. J. (2018). Trust, growth mindset, and student commitment to active learning in a college science course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17, ar10. doi:10.1187/cbe.17-06-0107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Thummaphan, P., Lan, M.-C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2015). Caution, student experience may vary: Social identities impact a student’s experience in peer discussions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14, ar 45. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-05-0108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National of Academy Sciences, 111, 8319–8320. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74. doi:10.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill, J. (2007). Biomechanics curriculum: Its content and relevance to movement sciences. Quest, 59, 25–33. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C. (2002). Common concerns about the force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 40, 542-547. doi:10.1119/1.1534822
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., & Knudson, D. (2008). Student factors related to learning in biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 7, 398–402. doi:10.1080/14763140802233207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., Smith, J., Bohne, M., & Knudson, D. (2012). Factors related to students’ learning of biomechanics concepts. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41, 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., & Knudson, D. (2018). Important learning factors in high- and low-achieving students in undergraduate biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 17, 361–370. doi:10.1080/14763141.2017.1347194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh, J., Gowthrop, L., & McLean, M. (2017). Perceptions of sport science students on the potential applications and limitations of blended learning in their education: A qualitative study. Sports Biomechanics, 16, 297–312. doi:10.1080/14763141.2017.1305439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., Noffal, G., Bauer, J., McGinnis, P., Bird, M., Chow, J., Bahamonde, R., Blackwell, J., Strohmeyer, S., & Abendroth-Smith, J. (2003). Development and evaluation of a biomechanics concept inventory. Sports Biomechanics, 2, 267–277. doi:10.1080/14763140308522823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2006). Biomechanics concept inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 81–82. doi:10.2466/PMS.103.1.81-82
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2007). Fundamentals of biomechanics (2nd ed.). Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., Bauer, J., & Bahamonde, R. (2009). Correlates of student learning in introductory biomechanics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 499–504. doi:10.24.66/PMS.108.2.499-504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2013). Physics and biomechanics education research: Improving learning of biomechanics concepts. In T-Y, Shiang, W-H Ho, C.F. Huang, & G.L. Tsai (Eds.) Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 72–76). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Meaney, K. (2018). Promoting Active-Learning Instruction and Research (PALIR) in Kinesiology Departments. Kinesiology Review, 7, 328–331. doi:10.1123/kr.2018-0047
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Wallace, B. (2019). Student perceptions of low-tech active learning and mastery of introductory biomechanics concepts. Sports Biomechanics. doi:10.1080/14763141.2019.1570322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2019a). Active learning and student beliefs about learning. In S. Breen, M. Walsh, & M. Stutz (Eds.) Proceedings 37th ISBS Conference. (pp. 328–331). Oxford, OH: University of Miami.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2019b). Do low-tech active learning exercises influence biomechanics student’s epistemology of learning? Sports Biomechanics. doi:10.1080/14763141.2019.1682650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer, P. L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 9–30. doi:10.1177/1469787407074008
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D. A., Chapman, L., Czajka, C. D., Jones, J. P., Ryker, K. D., & Wiggen, J. (2017). Instructional utility and learning efficacy of common active learning strategies. Journal of Geoscience Education, 85, 604–625. doi:10.5408/17-249.1
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C. (1991). Millikan lecture1990: What we teach and what is learned—closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301–315. doi:10.1119/1.16539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the literature. Journal of Engineering Research, 93, 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. E. (2016). Students’ views about potentially offering physics courses online. Journal of Science Education Technology, 25, 489–496. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9608-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riskowski, J. L. (2015). Teaching undergraduate biomechanics with just-in-time teaching. Sports Biomechanics, 14, 168–179. doi:10.1080/14763141.2015.1030686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. V., & Cardaciotto, L. (2011). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11, 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Soneral, P. A. G., & Wyse, S. A. (2017). A SCALE-UP mock-up: Comparison of learning gains in high- and low-tech active-learning environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16, ar12. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, E. J., Eddy, S. L., Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Crowe, A. J. (2017). Student perception of group dynamics predicts individual performance: Comfort and equity matter. PLoS One, 12, e0181336. doi:10.1371/journal.pone0181336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153–184. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneri, D., & Gannotti, M. (2014). A comparison of student outcomes in a physical therapy neurologic rehabilitation course based on delivery mode: Hybrid vs traditional. Journal of Allied Health, 43, 75E–81E.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B., & Kernozek, T. (2017). Self-efficacy theory applied to undergraduate biomechanics instruction. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 20, 10–15. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, B., Knudson, D., & Gheidi, N. (2020). Incorporating problem-based learning with direct instruction improves learning in undergraduate biomechanics. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, 100258. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, A. J. (2012). Exploring undergraduates’ perceptions of the use of active learning techniques in science lectures. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42, 80–87.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Short, J. L., Rangachari, P. K., Malone, D. T., Davie, B., Naidu, S., & Eise, N. (2015). Using active learning strategies to shift student attitudes and behaviours about learning and teaching in a research intensive educational context. Pharmacy Education, 15, 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, B. L., Eddy, S. L., Wener-Fligner, L., Freisem, K., Grunspan, D. Z., Theobald, E. J., Timbrook, J., Crowe, A. J., & Momsen, J. (2017). ASPECT: A survey to assess student perspective of engagement in an active-learning classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16, ar32. d oi: 1 01 187/c be.1 6-08-0 24 4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar