Center of mass change in the biomechanics citation network

References

• Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314–316. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.68.5.7804
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, B.-C. (2018). Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017. PeerJ, 6, e4357. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, B.-C., & Catani, P. (2016). Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Dies it make a difference? Learned Publishing, 29(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0176-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Chute, R., & Mailund, T. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS One, 4(6), e6022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
   Google Scholar
• Dorta-Gonza´lez, P., & Dorta-Gonza´lez, M. I. (2013). Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalization impact factor. Scientometrics, 95(2), 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0929-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finardi, U. (2014). On the time evolution of received citations in different scientific fields: An empirical study. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschet, M. (2010a). A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on web of science and google scholar. Scientometrics, 83(1), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0021-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschet, M. (2010b). The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeland, M., Howes, L., Hamstra, E., & Bahnmaier, S. (2014). Citation analysis to assist selection in kinesiology. The Serials Librarian, 67(3), 307–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2014.939327
   Google Scholar
• González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneberg, P. (2019). The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals. Scientometrics, 130(2), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03144-6
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2013). Impact and prestige of kinesiology-related journals. Comprehensive Psychology, 2(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2466/50.17.CP.2.13
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015a). Biomechanics scholar citations across academic ranks. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 7(1), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/bhk-2015-0021
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015b). Citation rate of highly-cited papers in 100 kinesiology-related journals. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.988336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2019). Citation metrics of excellence in sports biomechanics research sports biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 18(3), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2017.1391328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2020). Top cited research over fifteen years in sports biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 19(6), 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1518478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2022a). Citations to biomechanics articles from four databases. ISBS Proceedings Archive, 40, 349–442. https://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol40/iss1/82/
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2022b). What kinesiology research is most visible to the academic world? Quest, 74(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2092880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2023). Publication metrics and subject categories of biomechanics journals. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2023.11.4.x
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., Cardinal, B., & McCullagh, P. (2023). Synthesis of publication metrics analysis in kinesiology-related journals: Proxies for rigor, usage, and prestige. Quest, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2023.2237150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Chow, J. (2008). North American perception of the prestige of biomechanics serials. Gait & Posture, 27(4), 559–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Ostarello, J. (2008). International prestige of sports biomechanics serials. In Y. H. Kwon, J. Shim, & I. S. Shin (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVIth international conference On Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 62–66). Seoul National University. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/1829
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Ostarello, J. (2010). Influential literature in applied sports biomechanics. In R. Jensen, W. Ebben, E. Petushek, C. Richter, & K. Roemer (Eds.), Scientific Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 765–768). Northern Michigan University. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/4585
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D., & Quimby, S. (2023). Variation in recent citation metrics for biomechanics journals. ISBS Proceedings Archive, 41, Art. 64. https://commons.nmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2529&context=isbs
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327–1336. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Comins, J. A., & Milojevic, S. (2016). Citations: Indicators of quality? The impact fallacy. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 1, Ar1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2016.00001
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2018). Google scholar, web of Science, and scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, C. D., & Bruner, M. W. (2022). Citation network analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1989705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A. R., To, Q. G., & Vandelanotte, C. (2021). Vigorously cited: A bibliometric analysis of the 500 most cited physical activity articles. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8(8), 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2020-0744
   Google Scholar
• Moradi, E., Gholampour, S., & Gholampour, B. (2023). Past, present and future of sport policy: A bibliometric analysis of International journal of Sport policy and politics (2010–2022). International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 15(4), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2228829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El profesional de la información, 29(1), e290103. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narin, F., Pinski, G., & Gee, H. H. (1976). Structure of the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115:AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J
   Google Scholar
• Rangeon, S., Gilbert, W., & Bruner, M. (2012). Mapping the world of coaching science: A citation network analysis. Journal of Coaching Education, 5(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1123/jce.5.1.83
   Google Scholar
• Renjith, V. R., & Pradeepkumar, A. P. (2021). Citations of the top 100 most-cited papers of the journal scientometrics in web of science and its association and correlation with Scopus and Google scholar citations. Library Philosophy & Practice, 4710. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4710/
   Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628:AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. The British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
   Google Scholar
• Siler, K., Lariviere, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2019). The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(7), 800–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeling, S., Willett, P., Creaser, C., Fry, J., Pinfield, S., & Spezi, V. (2016). Open-access megaJournals: A bibliometric profile. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadpoor, A. A., & Nikooyan, A. A. (2011). Publication and citation in biomechanics: A comparison of closely related fields (2003-2010). Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 11(4), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519411004836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Feng, M., Liu, W., Yu, J., Wei, X., & Yang, K., Zhang, J., Peng, W., Luo, M., Han, T., Jin, Z., Yin, H., Sun, K., Yin, X., & Zhu, L. (2022). From mechanobiology to mechanical repair strategies: A bibliometric analysis of biomechanical studies of intervertebral discs. Journal of Pain Research, 15, 2015–2122. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S361938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. B., Lu, L., & Li, M. (2012). Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14(3), 033033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033033
   Google Scholar