Ethical decision-making for extremely preterm deliveries: results of a qualitative survey among obstetricians and midwives

REFERENCES

• Morrison JJ, Rennie JM. Clinical, scientific and ethical aspects of fetal and neonatal care at extremely preterm periods of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1341–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doron MW, Veness-Meehan KA, Margolis LH, et at. Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 1998;102:574–82
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus, and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecol-ogists, Committee on Obstetric Practice. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 1995;96:974–6
   Google Scholar
• Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society, Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestationnal age. Can Med Assoc J 1994;151:547–53
   Google Scholar
• Norup M. Treatment of extremely premature newborns: a survey of attitudes among Danish physicians. Acta Paediatr 1998;87:896–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders MR, Donohue PK, Oberdorf MA, et at. Perceptions of the limit of viability: neonatologists' attitudes toward extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol 1995;15:494–502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meadow W, Reimshisel T, Lantos J. Birth weight-specific mortality for extremely low birth weight infant vanishes by four days of life: epidemiology and ethics in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 1996;97:636–43
   Google Scholar
• Soll R. Consensus and controversy over resuscitation of the newborn infant. Lancet 1999;354:4–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraybill EN. Ethical issues in the care of extremely low birth weight infants. Semin Perinat 1998;22:207–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie JM. Perinatal management at the lower margin of viability. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:F214–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnström 0, Persson J. Ethical aspects of decision-making at the limit of viability. Acta Paediatr 1999;88:708–9
   Google Scholar
• Dehan M. Problemes éthiques soulevés par la reanimation néonatale. Méd Sci 1993;9:260–5
   Google Scholar
• Amon E, Shyken JM, Sibai BM. How small is too small and how early is too early? A survey of American obstetricians specializing in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Perinat 1992;9: 17–21
   Google Scholar
• Reuss ML, Gordon HR. Obstetrical judgements of viability and perinatal survival of extremely low birthweight infants. Am J Public Health 1995;85:362–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The limits of viability. J Perinat Med 1997;25:418–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garel M, Gosme-Seguret S, Kaminski M, et al. Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: a qualitative survey among obstetricians and midwives. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:811–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss AL. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M, et at., for the EURONIC Study Group. End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European coun-tries. Lancet 2000;355:2112–18
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, et at., and other members of the EURONIC Study Group. Treatment choices for extre-mely preterm infants: an international perspective. J Pediatr 2000;137:608–16
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon T. Dutch doctors change policy on treating preterm babies. Br Med J 2001;322:1383
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolke D, Meyer R. Cognitive status language attainment and prereading skills of 6-year-old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:94–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, et at. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICURE study group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:378–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larroque B. EPIPAGE: epidemiologic study of very premature infants. Protocol of the survey. Arch Pediatr 2000;7\(Suppl 2):339s–342s
   Google Scholar
• Finer NN, Barrington KJ. Decision-making in delivery room resuscitation: a team sport. Pediatrics 1998;102:644–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reflexions éthiques autour de la reanimation néonatale. Rapport n°65 du Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique pour les Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé. Paris, September 2000
   Google Scholar
• Breart G, Dehan M, Paris-Llado J, et at. Attitudes obstétricales et pédiatriques vis-à-vis de la grande prématurité. In Toumaire M, ed. Mises à jour en Gynécologie Obstétrique. CNGOF. Paris: Vigot, 1994:121–32
   Google Scholar
• Morse SB, Haywood JL, Goldenberg RL, et at. Estimation of neonatal outcome and perinatal therapy use. Pediatrics 2000;105:1046–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SK, Penner PL, Cox M. Comparison of the attitudes of health care professionals and parents toward active treatment of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1991;88:110–14
   Google Scholar
• Haywood JL, Goldenberg RL, Bronstein J, et al. Comparison of perceived and actual rates of survival and freedom from handicap in premature infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:432–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizun J, Dobrzynski M, Baron R, et at. Attitudes of healthcare professionals concerning extremely preterm infants in the delivery room. A regional study. Acta Paediatr 1999;88:789–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttini M, Rebagliato M, Bartoli P, et at. Parental visiting, communication and participation in ethical decisions: a comparison on neonatal unit policies in Europe. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonat Ed 1999;81:F84–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilemmes éthiques de la période périnatale. Recommanda-tions pour les decisions de fin de vie (abstention, limitation, arra des traitements et arra de vie). Fédération Nationale des Pédiatres Néonatologistes. Document issu des travaux de la Commission Ethique adopté par l'Assemblée Generale le 23/ 11/2000
   Google Scholar
• Martinez AM, Weiss E, Partridge C, et at. Management of extremely low birth weight infants: perceptions of viability and parental counselling practices. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92: 520–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton JV, Finnerty JJ, Lombardo PA, et at. Parental rights at the birth of a near-viable infant: conflicting perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:283–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DE, Fleishman AR. Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers. Am J Perinatol 2001;18: 117–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journal Officiel de la Republique Française, 17 janvier 1975, Loi 75.17
   Google Scholar