Agreement between two 3D ultrasound techniques for the assessment of the subpubic arch angle

References

• Cohen WR. Normal and abnormal labor. In: Reece EA, Hobbins JC, eds. Clinical obstetrics: the fetus and the mother. 3rd ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing; 2007: 1065–75
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal anatomy. In: Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al., eds. Williams obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005: 13–38
   Google Scholar
• Ikhena SE, Halligan AW, Naftalin NJ. Has pelvimetry a role in current obstetric practice? J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;19:463–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bottcher B, Radley SC. Pelvimetry: changing trends and attitudes. J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;21:459–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caldwell WE, Moloy HC. Anatomical variations in the female pelvis: their classification and obstetrical significance: (section of obstetrics and gynaecology). Proc R Soc Med 1938;32:1–30
   Google Scholar
• Choi S, Chan SS, Sahota DS, Leung TY. Measuring the angle of the subpubic arch using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound scan: intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility. Am J Perinatol 2013;30:191–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, et al. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:442–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrich SB, Shek K, Krahn U, Dietz HP. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:496–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Youssef A, Martelli F, et al. A narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with a higher risk of persistent posterior occiput position at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Youssef A, Martelli F, et al. A new method to measure the subpubic arch angle using 3-D ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015;38:195–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Ghi T, Martelli F, et al. Subpubic arch angle and mode of delivery in low-risk nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1159/000441517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Montaguti E, Sanlorenzo O, et al. A new simple technique for 3-dimensional sonographic assessment of the pelvic floor muscles. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:65–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Montaguti E, Sanlorenzo O, et al. Reliability of a new 3D ultrasound technique for pelvic hiatal area measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:187–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:165–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:387–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, et al. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:753–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:313–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Youssef A, Pilu G, et al. Intrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitism. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:238–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliescu DG, Adam G, Tudorache S, et al. Quantification of fetal head direction using transperineal ultrasound: an easier approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:607–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Stark M, Ghi T, et al. Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:508–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Youssef A, Maroni E, et al. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:430–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. Quantification of fetal head direction and descent. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:99–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Bochicchio M, Vaira L, et al. The fetal head evaluation during labor in the occiput posterior position: the ESA (evaluation by simulation algorithm) approach. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1151–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Bellussi F, Montaguti E, et al. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:183–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Bellussi F, Azzarone C, et al. The “occiput-spine angle”: a new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef A, Ghi T, Awad EE, et al. Ultrasound in labor: a caregiver's perspective. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:469–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar