References
- Malvasi A, Tinelli A. The smartphone use during intrapartum ultrasound: a useful tool to diagnose the persistent asynclitism and occiput posterior position before and during birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:3488–9
- Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, et al. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:437–40
- Malvasi A, Stark M, Ghi T, et al. Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:508–12
- Gardberg M, Laakkonen E, Sälevaara M. Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:746–9
- Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, et al. Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:425–8
- Le Ray C, Théau A, Ménard S, Goffinet F. What is new about obstetrical interventions during labor and normal delivery? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2014;43:413–23
- Barth WH. Jr. Persistent occiput posterior. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:695–709
- Phipps H, de Vries B, Jagadish U, Hyett J. Management of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor: a survey of midwifery practice in Australia. Birth 2014;41:64–9
- Sen K, Sakamoto H, Nakabayashi Y, et al. Management of the occiput posterior presentation: a single institute experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39:160–5
- Le Ray C, Serres P, Schmitz T, et al. Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:873–9
- Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:563–8
- Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:837–44
- Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:915–20
- Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O'Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1027–31
- Adam G, Sirbu O, Voicu C, et al. Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of fetal head position, tip the scale: natural or instrumental delivery? Curr Health Sci J 2014;40:18–22