A model to predict risk of postpartum infection after Caesarean delivery*

References

• Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(12):1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schneid-Kofman N, Sheiner E, Levy A, et al. Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;90(1):10–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witter FR, Lawson P, Ferrell J. Decreasing cesarean section surgical site infection: an ongoing comprehensive quality improvement program. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(4):429–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, et al. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1169–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, et al. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):271.e1–271.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamilio DM, Scifres CM. Extreme obesity and postcesarean maternal complications. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, et al. Comparison of costs of surgical site infection and endometritis after cesarean delivery using claims and medical record data. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(8):872–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard J, Ward W, Milstone A, et al. Financial impact of surgical site infections on hospitals: the hospital management perspective. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(10):907–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG practice bulletin no. 74. Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):225–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97–132; quiz 133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard A, Donohue K, Hyland T, et al. Reducing cesarean delivery surgical site infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(Suppl1):7S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley MM, Suda D, Tabsh K, et al. Reduction of surgical site infections in low transverse cesarean section at a University Hospital. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(9):820–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauk PN. Educational intervention, revised instrument sterilization methods, and comprehensive preoperative skin preparation protocol reduce cesarean section surgical site infections. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(4):319–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion no. 433: optimal goals for anesthesia care in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1197–1199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CDC, Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event; January 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf (Accessed: 6/19/2017).
   Google Scholar
• Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):625–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(2):134–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell F. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York (NY): Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cook NR. Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin Chem. 2008;54(1):17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufibach K. Use of brier score to assess binary predictions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(938, 9). author reply: 939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers AJ. Decision analysis for the evaluation of diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. Am Stat. 2008;62(4):314–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Calster B, Vickers AJ. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(2):162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker SG, Kramer BS. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction: decision analysis to the rescue. Discov Med. 2012;14(76):181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker SG, Cook NR, Vickers A, et al. Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009;172(4):729–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak. 2006;26(6):565–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattan MW, O’Rourke C, Yu C, et al. The wisdom of crowds of doctors: their average predictions outperform their individual ones. Med Decis Mak. 2016;36(4):536–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Stamilio DM. Methods of clinical prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(3):888–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81(24):1879–1886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino RBS, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadzia HK, Patel EM, Joshi D, et al. Obstetric surgical site infections: 2 grams compared with 3 grams of cefazolin in morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(4):708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio L, Nicolau DP, DaCosta M, et al. Cefazolin prophylaxis in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1205–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, et al. Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;87(3):227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, et al. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):56.e1–56.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägglund L, Christensen KK, Christensen P, et al. Risk factors in cesarean section infection. Obstet GynecolObstet Gynecol. 1983;62(2):145–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles TD, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(1):52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper JM, Bolling DR, Newton ER. The second stage of labor: factors influencing duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):976–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar