Psychological factors influencing choice of prenatal diagnosis in Chinese multiparous women with advanced maternal age

References

• Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, et al. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5Pt1):983–990.
   Google Scholar
• Shiming L. Prenatal diagnosis of birth defects for pregnant women with advanced age[J]. Chin J Lab Med. 2016;39(6):401–403. (Original work published in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Hawk AF, Saller DN. Screening for fetal aneuploidy: is maternal age relevant? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 55(1):217–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin NH, Gungor I. Congenital anomalies: parents’ anxiety and women’s concerns before prenatal testing and women’s opinions towards the risk factors. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar;17(6):827–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakić Radoš S, Košec V, Gall V. The psychological effects of prenatal diagnostic procedures: maternal anxiety before and after invasive and noninvasive procedures. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(12):1194–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csaba A, Bush MC, Saphier C. How painful are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling? Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(1):35–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferber A, Onyeije CI, Zelop CM, et al. Maternal pain and anxiety in genetic amniocentesis: expectation versus reality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(1): 13–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikamo S, Nakatsuka M. Knowledge and Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal testing among pregnant Japanese women. Acta Med Okayama. 2015;69(3): 155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivetti M, Melotti G, Morselli D, et al. Psychosocial factors affecting uptake of prenatal genetic testing: a pilot study. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(13):1276–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivetti M, Melotti G. Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process. J Genet Counsel. 2013;22(1):76–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH. Revision and validation of a scale to assess pregnancy stress. J Nurs Res. 2015;23(1):25–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DiPietro JA, Costigan KA, Gurewitsch ED. Fetal response to induced maternal stress. Early Hum Dev. 2003;74(2):125–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPietro JA, Hilton SC, Hawkins M, et al. Maternal stress and affect influence fetal neurobehavioral development. Dev Psychol. 2002;38(5):659–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderdice F, Lynn F, Lobel M. A review and psychometric evaluation of pregnancy-specific stress measures. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2012;33(2):62–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alder J, Fink N, Bitzer J, et al. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: a risk factor for obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcome? A critical review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(3):189–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscatello MR, Lorusso S, Bruno A, et al. Anger in women treated with assisted reproductive technology (ART): effects on mother and newborn. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(5):813–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi S, Hayashi T, Tada Y, et al. Do combined psychological stress examinations predict pregnancy outcome in an assisted reproductive technology program? Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42(3): 309–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG). Practice Bulletin No. 163: screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):e123–e137.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) [Internet]. Non-invasive prenatal Testing for chromosomal Abnormality using Maternal plasma DNA (Scientific Impact Paper No. 15) [cited 2014 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/scientific-impact-papers/sip_15_04032014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG). Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics; Committee on Genetics; SMFM. Practice bulletin No. 162: prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):e108–e122.
   Google Scholar
• Pariente G, Hasan L, Gadot Y, et al. Canadian women’s attitudes toward noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(24):4008–4014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalcek I, Huber G, Lammers C, et al. Anxiety scores before and after prenatal testing for congenital anomalies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;267(3):126–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng CC, Lai FM, Yeo GS. Assessment of maternal anxiety levels before and after amniocentesis. Singapore Med J. 2004;45(8):370–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çalışkan E, Özkan S, Cakıroğlu Y, et al. The effects of maternal anxiety prior to amniocentesis on uterine and fetal umbilical blood flow. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2009;10(3):162–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartha JL, Martinez-del-Fresno P, Romero-Carmona R, et al. Maternal anxiety and fetal behavior at 15 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(1): 57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes M, Canavarro MC. Risk knowledge and psychological distress during pregnancy among primiparous women of advanced age and their partners. J Midwif Womens Health. 2014;59(5):483–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren B, Uddenberg N. Prenatal diagnosis for psychological reasons: comparison with other indications, advanced maternal age and known genetic risk. Prenat Diagn. 1990;10(2):111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewison J. Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening. Bioethics. 2015;29(1):9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGovern MM, Goldberg JD, Desnick RJ. Acceptability of chorionic villi sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jul;155(1):25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson G, Downe S. Emotions and support needs following a distressing birth:scoping study with pregnant multigravida women in North-West England. Midwifery. 2016;40:32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergner A, Beyer R, Klapp BF, et al. Pregnancy after early pregnancy loss: a prospective study of anxiety, depressive symptomatology and coping. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2008;29(2):105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikcević AV, Kuczmierczyk AR, Nicolaides KH. The influence of medical and psychological interventions on women’s distress after miscarriage. J Psychosom Res. 2007;63(3):283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lok IH, Neugebauer R. Psychological morbidity following miscarriage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(2):229–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin CA, Huberty J, Downs DS. Influences of prior miscarriage and weight status on perinatal psychological well-being, exercise motivation and behavior. Midwifery. 2016;43:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong X, Hao J, Tao F, et al. Pregnancy loss and anxiety and depression during subsequent pregnancies: data from the C-ABC study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166(1):30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JQ, Tang DS. China’s universal two-child policy: grounds, effects and strategies[J]. Popul Res. 2015;39(6):3–12. (Original work published in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X. Reconsideration of the plight of women’s employment and childbearing in China – from the status of women’s subjectivity. Reform Strat. 2017;33(10):48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Belgian Society for Human Genetics (BeSHG). NIPT good clinical practice guidelines [Internet]. [cited 2017 Feb 3]. Available from: http://www.beshg.be/download/guidelines/20170126_NIPT_good_clinical_practice_guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar