Comparison of 2D versus M-mode echocardiography for assessing fetal myocardial wall thickness

References

• Allan LD, Joseph MC, Boyd EGCA, et al. M-mode echocardiography in the developing human fetus. Br Heart J. 1982;47(6):573–583.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharland GK, Allan LD. Normal fetal cardiac measurements derived by cross-sectional echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2(3):175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro I, Degani S, Leibovitz Z, et al. Fetal cardiac measurements derived by transvaginal and transabdominal cross-sectional echocardiography from 14 weeks of gestation to term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12(6):404–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Votava-Smith JK, Habli M, Cnota JF, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and cerebrovascular redistribution precede overt recipient twin cardiomyopathy in early-stage twin–twin transfusion syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(5):533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlmuth C, Boudreaux D, Moise KJJ, et al. Cardiac pathophysiology in twin–twin transfusion syndrome: new insights into its evolution. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 [Mar 31]. doi: 10.1002/uog.17480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-López M, Cruz-Lemini M, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, et al. Descriptive analysis of different phenotypes of cardiac remodeling in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(2):207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crispi F, Bijnens B, Sepulveda-Swatson E, et al. Postsystolic shortening by myocardial deformation imaging as a sign of cardiac adaptation to pressure overload in fetal growth restriction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(5):781–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Lemini M, Crispi F, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, et al. Value of annular M-mode displacement vs tissue Doppler velocities to assess cardiac function in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comas M, Crispi F, Cruz-Martinez R, et al. Usefulness of myocardial tissue Doppler vs conventional echocardiography in the evaluation of cardiac dysfunction in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):45.e1–45.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Lemini M, Crispi F, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, et al. A fetal cardiovascular score to predict infant hypertension and arterial remodeling in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(6):552.e1–552.e22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda JO, Hunter L, Tibby S, et al. Myocardial deformation in fetuses with coarctation of the aorta: a case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(5):623–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guirado L, Crispi F, Masoller N, et al. Biventricular impact of mild to moderate pulmonary valve stenosis in fetal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 [Mar 10]. doi: 10.1002/uog.17456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balli S, Pac FA, Ece İ, et al. Assessment of cardiac functions in fetuses of gestational diabetic mothers. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35(1):30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Xu Y, Fu J, et al. Evaluation of the regional ventricular systolic function by two-dimensional strain echocardiography in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) fetuses with good glycemic control. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(18):2150–2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Zhou Q, Yan Y, et al. Characterization of fetal cardiac structure and function detected by echocardiography in women with normal pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(5):459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veille JC, Sivakoff M, Hanson R, et al. Interventricular septal thickness in fetuses of diabetic mothers. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(1):51–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Otero L, López M, Gómez O, et al. Zidovudine treatment in HIV-infected pregnant women is associated with fetal cardiac remodelling. AIDS. 2016;30(9):1393–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, Crispi F, Bijnens B, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies are associated with cardiovascular remodeling in utero that persists postnatally. Circulation. 2013;128(13):1442–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, Crispi F, Cruz-Lemini M, et al. Differential effect of assisted reproductive technology and small-for-gestational age on fetal cardiac remodeling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(1):63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veille JC, Sivakoff M, Nemeth M. Evaluation of the human fetal cardiac size and function. Am J Perinatol. 1990;7(1):54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongiovì M, Fesslova V, Fazio G, et al. Diagnosis and prognosis of fetal cardiomyopathies: a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16(26):2929–2934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasankaran S, Sharland GK, Simpson JM. Dilated cardiomyopathy presenting during fetal life. Cardiol Young. 2005;15(4):409–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firpo C, Hoffman JI, Silverman NH. Evaluation of fetal heart dimensions from 12 weeks to term. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(5):594–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan J, Silverman NH, Hoffman JI, et al. Cardiac dimensions determined by cross-sectional echocardiography in the normal human fetus from 18 weeks to term. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70(18):1459–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberhoffer R, Högel J, Lang D. Normal characteristics of cardiac dimensions and function in the fetus. Eur J Ultrasound. 1995;2(2):93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, et al. Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;136(1):20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson PF, Petrie A. Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology. Theriogenology. 2010;73(9):1167–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(1):85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St John Sutton MG, Gewitz MH, Shah B, et al. Quantitative assessment of growth and function of the cardiac chambers in the normal human fetus: a prospective longitudinal echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1984;69(4):645–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macklon NS, Hop WC, Wladimiroff JW. Fetal cardiac function and septal thickness in diabetic pregnancy: a controlled observational and reproducibility study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(6):661–666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tedesco GD, de Souza Bezerra M, Barros FS, et al. Reference ranges of fetal cardiac biometric parameters using three-dimensional ultrasound with spatiotemporal image correlation M Mode and their applicability in congenital heart diseases. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(2):271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luewan S, Yanase Y, Tongprasert F, et al. Fetal cardiac dimensions at 14–40 weeks’ gestation obtained using cardio-STIC-M. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(4):416–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devore GR. Assessing fetal cardiac ventricular function. Semin Fetal Neonat Med. 2005;10(6):515–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39.e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-flores J, Jañez M, Gonzalez MC, et al. Fetal myocardial morphological and functional changes associated with well-controlled gestational diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(1):24–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crispi F, Bijnens B, Figueras F, et al. Fetal growth restriction results in remodeled and less efficient hearts in children. Circulation. 2010;121(22):2427–2436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Lemini M, Crispi F, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, et al. Fetal cardiovascular remodeling persists at 6 months in infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho JS, Allan LD, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(3):348–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar