References
- Martin JA. National Vital Statistics. Center for Disease Control (CDC); 2015.
- Mackeen AD, Devaraj T, Baxter JK. Cesarean skin closure preferences: a survey of obstetricians. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:753–756.
- Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Shim HG, et al. Preferences in cesarean delivery surgical technique: a survey of maternal-fetal medicine fellows. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:77–81.
- Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:621.e1–610.
- Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, CROSS Consortium, et al. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1169. Jun
- Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, et al. Pain associated with cesarean delivery skin closure: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:702–707.
- Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med. 1997;42:627–630.
- Gaertner E, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in cesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;138:29–33.
- Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, et al. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs sub-cuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:265.e1.
- Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, et al. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:285.e1.
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, et al. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:36.e1.
- de Graaf I, Rengerink KO, Wiersma IC, et al. Techniques for wound closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;204:S267.
- Aabakke AJM, Krebs L, Pipper CB, et al. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:878–884.
- Huppelschoten AG, van Ginderen JC, van den Broek KC, et al. Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:916–924.
- Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, et al. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:33–38.
- Sharma C, Verma A, Soni A, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with ‘staples’ or ‘subcuticular sutures’ in emergency cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:655–659.
- Chunder A, Devjee J, Khedun SM, et al. A randomised controlled trial on suture materials for skin closure at caesarean section: Do wound infection rates differ? S Afr Med J. 2012;102:374–376.