507
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Intrapartum cervical lacerations and their impact on future pregnancy outcome

, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 883-887 | Received 19 Nov 2017, Accepted 25 Jul 2018, Published online: 07 Sep 2018

References

  • Parikh R, Brotzman S, Anasti JN. Cervical lacerations: some surprising facts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:e17–e18.
  • Melamed N, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, et al. Intrapartum cervical lacerations: characteristics, risk factors, and effects on subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:388.e1–388.e4.
  • Harger JH. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;56:543–548.
  • Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Baron J, et al. The significance of a uterine rupture in subsequent births. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:799–803.
  • Sheiner E, Levy A, Mazor M. Precipitate labor: higher rates of maternal complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;116:43–47.
  • Suzuki S. Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in vaginal singleton deliveries in women with cerclage. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7:714–716.
  • Kramer MS, Berg C, Abenhaim H, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:449.e1–449.e7.
  • Seravalli V, Potti S, Berghella V. Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:294–298.
  • Wong LF, Wilkes J, Korgenski K, et al. Intrapartum cervical laceration and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. AJP Rep. 2016;6:e318–ee323.
  • Corr DT, Gallant-Behm CL, Shrive NG, et al. Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:250–259.
  • White WL, Brody GS, Glaser AA, et al. Tensiometric studies of unwounded and wounded skin: results using a standardized testing method. Ann Surg. 1971;173:19–25.
  • Shah PS, Zao J, Knowledge Synthesis Group of Determinants of p, /, births LBW. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG. 2009;116:1425–1442.
  • Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, et al. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:604–607.
  • Payne TN, Carey JC, Rayburn WF. Prior third- or fourth-degree perineal tears and recurrence risks. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1999;64:55–57.
  • Vyas NA, Vink JS, Ghidini A, et al. Risk factors for cervical insufficiency after term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:787–791.
  • Armarnik S, Sheiner E, Piura B, et al. Obstetric outcome following cervical conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:765–769.
  • Johnstone FD, Beard RJ, Boyd IE, et al. Cervical diameter after suction termination of pregnancy. Br Med J. 1976;1:68–69.
  • Saccone G, Perriera L, Berghella V. Prior uterine evacuation of pregnancy as independent risk factor for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:572–591.
  • Iwahashi M, Muragaki Y, Ooshima A, et al. Decreased type I collagen expression in human uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2231–2235.
  • Warren JE, Silver RM, Dalton J, et al. Collagen 1 Alpha1 and transforming growth factor-beta polymorphisms in women with cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:619.
  • Leduc L, Wasserstrum N. Successful treatment with the Smith-Hodge pessary of cervical incompetence due to defective connective tissue in Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Amer J Perinatol. 1992;9:25–27.
  • Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with Müllerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:229–237.
  • Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:371–382.
  • Kaufman RH, Adam E, Hatch EE, et al. Continued follow-up of pregnancy outcomes in diethylstilbestrol-exposed offspring. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:483–489.
  • Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, et al. Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1106–1112.
  • Krafts KP. Tissue repair: the hidden drama. Organogenesis. 2010;6:225–233.
  • Broughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE. Wound healing: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1e-S–32e-S.
  • Osterman MJK, Martin JA. Changes in cesarean delivery rates by gestational Age: United States, 1996–2011. NCHS Data Brief. 2013;124:1–8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.