Safely lowering the emergency Cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates using the Fetal Reserve Index

References

• ACOG. Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome: ACOG Washington, DC, USA; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG. Neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy: defining the pathogenesis and Pathophysiology. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Soncini E, Paganelli S, Vezzani C, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(14):1465–1469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD006066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomäki O, Luukkaala T, Luoto R, et al. Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(4):298–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas N, Nel MR, Robinson PN. The anaesthetic classification of Caesarean sections. Anaesthesia. 1996;51(8):791–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelmann K, Sundh V. Survival with cerebral palsy over five decades in western Sweden. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(8):762–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocklehurst P, Field DJ, Juszczak E, et al. The INFANT trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10089):28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes DA, Peipert JF. Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic of failure. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1397–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartwelle TP, Johnston JC. Cerebral palsy litigation: change course or abandon ship. J Child Neurol. 2015;30(7):828–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfel D. Using a differential diagnosis to prove that intrapartum asphyxia is a significant cause of cerebral palsy. Am J Trial Advocacy. 2006;30:89–163.
   Google Scholar
• MacLennan A, Nelson KB, Hankins G, et al. Who will deliver our grandchildren? Implications of cerebral palsy litigation. JAMA. 2005;294(13):1688–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Knijf A, Pattinson RC. Confidential enquiries into quality of care of women in labour using Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy as a marker. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2(4):219–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vintzileos AM. Measuring the impact of attending physician teaching in an obstetrics and gynecology residency program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):617–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriye BK, Gregory KD, Saade GR, et al. Quality measures in high-risk pregnancies: executive summary of a Cooperative Workshop of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):B2–B25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benacerraf BR, Minton KK, Benson CB, et al. Proceedings: beyond ultrasound first forum on improving the quality of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins L, Hampton BS, Abbott JF, et al. To the point: medical education, technology, and the millennial learner. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):188–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moaddab A, Clark SL, Dildy GA, et al. The July phenomenon in current obstetric practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):487–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke N, Burke G, Breathnach F, et al. Prediction of Cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter genesis study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):598.e1–598.e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(5):510–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholapurkar SL. Imperative for improvements and international convergence of intrapartum fetal monitoring: a bird’s eye view. WJOG. 2016;5(1):102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Hamilton EF, Garite TJ, et al. The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(2):163.e1–163.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parer JT, King T, Flanders S, et al. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(5):289–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser GH, Kwee A. Cardiotocography alone is outdated and ST analysis is the way forward in fetal monitoring: FOR: does the use of ST analysis in conjunction with cardiotocography improve perinatal outcome and/or reduce interventions for fetal distress? BJOG. 2016;123(10):1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stener Jørgensen J. Fetal scalp blood sampling should be abandoned: AGAINST: fetal scalp blood sampling in conjunction with electronic fetal monitoring reduces the risk of unnecessary operative delivery. BJOG. 2016;123(11):1771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans MI, Eden RD, Britt DW, et al. Re-engineering the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring to identify reversible risk for cerebral palsy: a case control series. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018:1–9. doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1441283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden RD, Evans MI, Evans SM, et al. The “fetal reserve index”: re-engineering the interpretation and responses to fetal heart rate patterns. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43(2):90–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M, Eden RD, Evans S, et al. Re-engineering electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) interpretation: using the fetal reserve index (FRI) to anticipate the need for emergent operative delivery. Reprod Sci. 2018;25:487–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifrin BS, Ater S. Fetal hypoxic and ischemic injuries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18(2):112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson KR, James DC. Effects of oxytocin-induced uterine hyperstimulation during labor on fetal oxygen status and fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):34.e1–34.e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan JL, Casey BM, Bloom SL, et al. Metabolic acidemia in live births at 35 weeks of gestation or greater. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(2):279–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L. The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples. BJOG. 2012;119(7):824–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Nageotte MP, Garite TJ, et al. Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(2):89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray DM, O’Riordan MN, Horgan R, et al. Fetal heart rate patterns in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: relationship with early cerebral activity and neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(8):605–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan JP, Kim JO. Fetal heart rate observations in the brain-damaged infant. Semin Perinatol. 2000;24(3):221–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholapurkar SL. Critical imperative for the reform of British interpretation of fetal heart rate decelerations: analysis of FIGO and NICE guidelines, post-truth foundations, cognitive fallacies, myths and Occam’s razor. J Clin Med Res. 2017;9(4):253–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Arulkumaran S, FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parer JT, Ugwumadu A. Impediments to a unified international approach to the interpretation and management of intrapartum cardiotocographs. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(3):272–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruksanusak N, Thongphanang P, Suntharasaj T, et al. Combined maternal-associated risk factors with intrapartum fetal heart rate classification systems to predict peripartum asphyxia neonates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;218:85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Arulkumaran S. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parer JT, Ugwumadu A. Impediments to a unified international approach to the interpretation and management of intrapartum cardiotocographs. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruksanusak N, Thongphanang P, Suntharasaj T, Suwanrath C, Geater A. Combined maternal-associated risk factors with intrapartum fetal heart rate classification systems to predict peripartum asphyxia neonates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;218:85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar