Intrapartum ultrasound monitoring of malposition and malrotation during labor neuraxial analgesia: maternal outcomes

References

• Malvasi A, Barbera A, Ghi T, et al. Lateral asynclitism: introduction of a new terminolgy associated to specific fetal position of the fetal head diagnosed by ultrasound in the second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(15):1839–1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Di Renzo GC, Tinelli A. Is twisted head position lateral asynclitism in the first stage of labor? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(2):251–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison MS, Griffin JB, McClure EM, et al. Maternal mortality from obstructed labor: a MANDATE analysis of the ability of technology to save lives in sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(9):873–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth WH Jr. Persistent occiput posterior. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):695–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Barbera A, et al. Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(5):520–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sng BL, Kwok SC, Sia AT. Modern neuraxial labour analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(3):285–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popowski T, Rozemberg P. Clinical evaluation of labor and intrapartum sonography. In: Malvasi A, editor. Intrapartum ultrasonography for labor management. Heidelberg Verlag Berlin: Springer Publisher; 2013. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: Operative Vaginal Delivery. Committee on practice bulletins—obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e56–e65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinelli A, Gustapane S, Giacci S, et al. Intrapartum sonography and clinical risk management. In: Malvasi A, editor. Intrapartum ultrasonography for labor management. Heidelberg Verlag Berlin: Springer Publisher; 2013. p. 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, et al. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(4):442–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera AF, Tinelli A, Pacella E, et al. Occiput posterior position and intrapartum sonography. In: Malvasi A. Intrapartum ultrasonography for labor management. Heidelberg Verlag Berlin: Springer Publisher; 2013. p. 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Barbera A, Di Vagno G, et al. Asynclitism: a literature review of an often forgotten clinical condition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(16):1890–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. The role of oxytocin in parenting and as augmentative pharmacotherapy: critical issues and bold conjectures. J Neuroendocrinol. 2016;28(8).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill AG, Spain J. Intrapartum fetal monitoring. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;58(2):263–268.
   Google Scholar
• Cuerva MJ, Bamberg C, Tobias P, et al. Use of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of complicated operative forceps delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(6):687–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, et al. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(1):82–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckelmann AM, Kalache K. Fetal progression in the birth canal: state of the art. In: Malvasi A. Intrapartum ultrasonography for labor management. Heidelberg Verlag Berlin: Springer Publisher; 2013. p. 159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera AF. Angle of progression: an objective assessment of fetal head descent in the birth canal. In: Malvasi A. Intrapartum ultrasonography for labor management. Heidelberg Verlag Berlin: Springer Publisher; 2013. p. 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Station of the fetal presenting part. VI. Arrest of descent in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;47(2):129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borthen I, Lossius P, Skjaerven R, et al. Changes in frequency and indications for cesarean section in Norway 1967–1984. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(7):589–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann E, Libhaber E. Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;101(3):285–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayburn WF, Siemers KH, Legino LJ, et al. Dystocia in late labor: determining fetal position by clinical and ultrasonic techniques. Am J Perinatol. 1989;6(3):316–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, et al. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the “angle of progression” predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):326–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, et al. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floberg J, Belfrage P, Ohlsén H. Influence of the pelvic outlet capacity on fetal head presentation at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(2):127–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frudinger A, Halligan S, Spencer JA, et al. Influence of the subpubic arch angle on anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence following childbirth. BJOG. 2002;109(11):1207–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, et al. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(6):955–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg. 2008;247(2):224–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi I, D’Amico R, Fenu V, et al. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(2):210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatin AA, Eckert LO, Boulvain M, et al. Dysfunctional labor: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2017;35(48 Pt A):6538–6545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Giacci F, Gustapane S, et al. Intrapartum sonographic signs: new diagnostic tools in malposition and malrotation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(15):2408–2413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotoia A, Mirabella L, Raimondo P, et al. Complications of regional anesthesia. In: Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Di Renzo GC, editors. Management and therapy of late pregnancy complications. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 265–294.
   Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Montanari Vergallo G, Tinelli A, et al. Can the intrapartum ultrasonography reduce the legal liability in distocic labor and delivery? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(8):1108–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Cavallotti C, Resta L, et al. Laminin and collagen IV: two polypeptides as marker of dystocic labor. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2017;18(2):149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar