238
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Universal cervical length screening with a cervicometer to prevent preterm birth <34 weeks: a decision and economic analysis

&
Pages 3670-3679 | Received 29 Jun 2018, Accepted 11 Feb 2019, Published online: 05 Mar 2019

References

  • Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379:2162–2172.
  • Mella MT, Berghella V. Prediction of preterm birth: cervical sonography. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:317–324.
  • Domin CM, Smith EJ, Terplan M. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length as a predictor of preterm birth: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ultrasound Q. 2010;26:241–248.
  • Crane JMG, Hutchens D. Use of transvaginal ultrasonography to predict preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:640–645.
  • Crane JMG, Hutchens D. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in asymptomatic high-risk women with a short cervical length in the previous pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:38–43.
  • Crane JMG, Hutchens D. Follow-up cervical length in asymptomatic high-risk women and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. J Perinatol. 2011;31:318–323.
  • Murakawa H, Utumi T, Hasegawa I, et al. Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:829–832.
  • Berghella V. Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67:653–658.
  • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee, with assistance of Vincenzo Berghella. Progesterone and preterm birth prevention: translating clinical trials data into clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:376–386.
  • Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:18–31.
  • Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:124.e1–124.19.
  • Burwick RM, Lee GT, Benedict JL, et al. Blinded comparison of cervical portio length measurements by digital examination vs Cervilenz. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:e37–e39.
  • Möller MIP, Henderson JJ, Nathan EA, et al. Cervilenz™ is an effective tool for screening cervical-length in comparison to transvaginal ultrasound. J Maternal–Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:378–382.
  • Ross MG, Beall MH. Prediction of preterm birth: nonsonographic cervical methods. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:312–316.
  • Lavin JP Jr, Guy M, Gil K, et al. The use of the Cervilenz device to aid in the diagnosis of premature labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1816–1819.
  • Burwick RM, Zork NM, Lee GT, et al. Cervilenz assessment of cervical length compared to fetal fibronectin in the prediction of preterm delivery in women with threatened preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:127–131.
  • Miller ES, Grobman WA. Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:546.e1–546.e6.
  • Werner EF, Han CS, Pettker CM, et al. Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:32–37.
  • Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Caughey AB, et al. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:548.e1–548.e8.
  • Ross MG, Cousins L, Baxter-Jones R, et al. Objective cervical portio length measurements: consistency and efficacy of screening for a short cervix. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:385–389.
  • Baxter JK, Adair CD, Paidas MJ, et al. Utility of a cervicometer in assessing cervical length and risk of preterm birth: a multicenter study. Poster presented at ACOG Poster Presentation; 2014.
  • Porcaro G, Clerici G, Romanelli M, et al. Effectiveness of a new cervicometer in evaluating the risk of preterm delivery [article in Italian]. Minerva Ginecol. 2013;65:327–330.
  • Facco FL, Simhan HN. Short ultrasonographic cervical length in women with low-risk obstetric history. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:858–862.
  • US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual. Evidence report development – Section 4 [cited 2015 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/procedure-manual—section-4.
  • Hoyert DL, Xu J. Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61:1–51.
  • Strauss D, Brooks J, Rosenbloom L, et al. Life expectancy in cerebral palsy: an update. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:487–493.
  • Pizzi LT, Seligman N, Baxter J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of vaginal progesterone gel in reducing preterm birth: a decision analytic model based on the pregnant randomized clinical trial. Value Health. 2013;16:A74.
  • Phibbs CS, Schmitt SK. Estimates of the cost and length of stay changes that can be attributed to one-week increases in gestational age for premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82:85–95.
  • Nicholson WK, Frick KD, Powe NR. Economic burden of hospitalizations for preterm labor in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:95–101.
  • Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length < or = 15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1458–1467.
  • Pham CT, Crowther CA. Birth outcomes: utility values that postnatal women, midwives and medical staff express. BJOG: Internal J Obs Gyn. 2003;110:121–127.
  • Vandenbussche FP, De Jong-Potjer LC, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Differences in the valuation of birth outcomes among pregnant women, mothers, and obstetricians. Birth. 1999;26:178–183.
  • Matijevic R, Grgic O, Vasilj O. Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1342–1347.
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.