Operative vacuum vaginal delivery: effect of compliance with recommended checklist

References

• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64:1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Plevani C, Incerti M, Del Sorbo D, et al. Cesarean delivery rates and obstetric culture – an Italian register-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gei AF. Prevention of the first cesarean delivery: the role of operative vaginal delivery. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardos J, Loudon H, Rekawek P, et al. Association between senior obstetrician supervision of resident deliveries and mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:486–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacca A. Handbook of vacuum extraction in obstetric practice. 3rd ed. Albion, Australia: Vacca Research Pty Ltd; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zanetta G, Tampieri A, Currado I, et al. Changes in cesarean Delivery in an Italian University Hospital, 1982–1996: a comparison with the National trend. Birth. 1999;26:144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciriello E, Locatelli A, Incerti M, et al. Comparative analysis of cesarean delivery rates over a 10-year period in a single institution using 10-class classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2717–2720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-Top Guideline No. 26. Oper Vaginal Deliv. 2011; Appendix 1, p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e56–e65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragusa PS, Bitterman A, Auerbach B, et al. Effectiveness of surgical safety checklists in improving patient safety. Orthopedics. 2016;39:e307–e310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark S, Belfort M, Saade G, et al. Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:480.e1–480.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 17, 2000: operative vaginal delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2001;74:69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Apuzzio JJ, Vintzileos AM, Berghella V, et al. Operative obstetrics. 4th ed. In: Locatelli A, Pintucci A, editors. Vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor and Francys; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:661–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:696–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attilakos G, Sibanda T, Winter C, et al. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device. BJOG. 2005;112:1510–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskett TF, Fanning CA, Young DC. A prospective observational study of 1000 vacuum assisted deliveries with the OmniCup device. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:573–580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groom KM, Jones BA, Miller N, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi OmniCup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2006;113:183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacca A. Operative vaginal delivery: clinical appraisal of a new vacuum extraction device. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;41:156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraca GM, Sabr Y, Lisonkova S, et al. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station. CMAJ. 2017;189:E764–E772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghidini A, Stewart D, Pezzullo JC, et al. Neonatal complications in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: are they associated with number of pulls, cup detachments, and duration of vacuum application? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramphul M, Kennelly MM, Burke G, et al. Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the instrumental delivery and ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496. BJOG. 2015;122:558–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, et al. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG. 2014;121:1029–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:69.e1–69.e10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popowski T, Porcher R, Fort J, et al. Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Dall'Asta A, Masturzo B, et al. Randomised Italian sonography for occiput POSition trial ante vacuum (R.I.S.POS.T.A.). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:699–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges R, Simpson A, Gurau D, et al. Learning from experience: development of a cognitive task-list to assess the second stage of labour for operative delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:354–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton G, Daniels K, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, et al. Checklists and multidisciplinary team performance during simulated obstetric hemorrhage. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016;25:9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar