References
- Yüksel D, Yüce T, Kalafat E, et al. The views of nulliparous pregnant women on the types of delivery. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;13:127–131.
- Adıgüzel D, Nazili H, Haydardedeoğlu F, et al. Sezaryen ve normal doğum yapan kadınlarda hasta memnuniyetinin araştırılması. Adana Numune Egıt Arast Hastan Tıp Derg. 2013;1:13–20.
- Ergöl Ş, Kürtüncü M. Bir üniversite hastanesinde kadınların sezaryen doğum tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler. Hacettepe University Hemsire Fakultesi Derg 2014;1:26–34.
- Serçekuş P, Egelioglu Cetisli N, İnci FH. Birth preferences by nulliparous women and their partners in Turkey. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2015;6:182–185.
- Hildingsson I, Johansson M, Karlström A, et al. Factors associated with a positive birth experience: an exploration of Swedish Women’s experiences. Int J Childbirth 2013;3:153–164.
- Sahin NH. Seksio-Sezaryen:Yaygınlığı ve sonuçları. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi 2009;2:93–98.
- Altuntaş H, Dansuk R, Köse O. Sezaryen oranlarının çeşitli değişkenlere bağlı olarak değerlendirilmesi. KÜ Tıp Fak Derg 2013;15:1–7.
- Bülbül G. İstanbul’da Çalışan Bir Grup Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Uzmanının Doğum Şekli Ile Ilgili Görüş ve Önerileri [master’s thesis]. İstanbul: T C Marmara University; 2012.
- World Health Statistics 2014; [cited 2018 Jan 10]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng.pdf?ua=1.
- Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies; 2014; [cited 2018 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/TDHS_2013_main.report.pdf.
- Birth and Cesarean Action Management Guideline. Ankara, Turkey: Public Health Institution of Turkey; 2010. Turk Health Minister; [accessed 2018 Mar 15] Available from: https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/a%C3%A7sap27.pdf.
- Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gyneacology (TJOD-2010). Turkish Health Ministry and TJOD action plan to decrease cesarean section rate. Available from: http://www.tjod.org/saglik-bakanligi-tjod-sezaryen-oranlarini-azaltma-ortak-eylem-plani/
- Atan SÜ, Duran ET, Kavlak O, et al. Spontaneous vaginal delivery or cesarean section? What do Turkish women think? Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19:1–7.
- Deng W, Klemetti R, Long Q, et al. Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:285.
- Canbal M, Yılmaz A. The standard of knowledge for cesarean section in women who applied to family medicine: two centered cross-sectional study. Dicle Med J. 2014;41:319–325.
- Prenatal Care Management Guideline. Ankara, Turkey: Public Health Institution of Turkey; 2014. Turk Health Minister; [cited 2017 Mar 20]. Available from: http://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/dogumonubakim.pdf.
- Özkan S, Sakal FN, Avcı E, et al. Kadınların doğum yöntemi tercihi ve ilişkili faktörler. Turk J Public Health. 2013;11:59–71.
- Vatansever Z, Okumuş H. Gebelerin doğum şekline karar verme durumlarının incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Unv HYO ED. 2013;6:82–87.
- Yıldız S, Caypınar SS, Cengiz H, et al. Awareness and perceptions of Turkish women towards delivery methods. J Clin Exp Investig. 2014;5:173–178.
- Karabulutlu Ö. Kadınların doğum şekli tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler. İ.Ü.F.N. Haematol Derg. 2012;20:210–218.
- Oner S, Kocas F. The prevalence of cesarean section among 18-49-year-old women living in Mersin province and affecting factors. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2016;15:401.
- Kambale MJ. Social predictors of cesarean section births in Italy. Afr Health Sci. 2011;11:560–565.
- Cesaroni G, Forastiere F, Perucci CA. Are cesarean deliveries more likely for poorly educated parents? A brief report from Italy. Birth. 2008;35:241–244.
- Gözükara F, Eroğlu K. İlk doğumunu yapmış kadınların (primipar) doğum şekline yönelik tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler. Hacettepe Univ Saglik Bilim Fak Hemsire Derg. 2008;15:32–46.
- Antenatal Care. Opportunities for Africa’s newborn. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2010; [cited 10 Mar 2018] Available from: http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/publications/oanfullreport.pdf.
- Uzunçakmak C, Güldaş A, Aydın S, et al. Investigation of cesarean sections at Istanbul Training and Research Hospital obstetrics and gynecology department between 2005 and 2012. Istanbul Med J. 2013;14:112–116.
- Phaloprakarn C, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S. Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes among Thai and other Southeast Asian pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42:936–943.
- Chiossi G, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:561–569.
- Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, et al. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD004667.
- Shetty P. More midwives needed to improve maternal and newborn survival. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:804–805.