547
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Why have the numbers of cesareans increased globally? The factors that affect women’s decisions about cesarean delivery in Turkey

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 3529-3537 | Received 23 May 2018, Accepted 10 Jul 2019, Published online: 24 Jul 2019

References

  • Yüksel D, Yüce T, Kalafat E, et al. The views of nulliparous pregnant women on the types of delivery. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;13:127–131.
  • Adıgüzel D, Nazili H, Haydardedeoğlu F, et al. Sezaryen ve normal doğum yapan kadınlarda hasta memnuniyetinin araştırılması. Adana Numune Egıt Arast Hastan Tıp Derg. 2013;1:13–20.
  • Ergöl Ş, Kürtüncü M. Bir üniversite hastanesinde kadınların sezaryen doğum tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler. Hacettepe University Hemsire Fakultesi Derg 2014;1:26–34.
  • Serçekuş P, Egelioglu Cetisli N, İnci FH. Birth preferences by nulliparous women and their partners in Turkey. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2015;6:182–185.
  • Hildingsson I, Johansson M, Karlström A, et al. Factors associated with a positive birth experience: an exploration of Swedish Women’s experiences. Int J Childbirth 2013;3:153–164.
  • Sahin NH. Seksio-Sezaryen:Yaygınlığı ve sonuçları. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi 2009;2:93–98.
  • Altuntaş H, Dansuk R, Köse O. Sezaryen oranlarının çeşitli değişkenlere bağlı olarak değerlendirilmesi. KÜ Tıp Fak Derg 2013;15:1–7.
  • Bülbül G. İstanbul’da Çalışan Bir Grup Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Uzmanının Doğum Şekli Ile Ilgili Görüş ve Önerileri [master’s thesis]. İstanbul: T C Marmara University; 2012.
  • World Health Statistics 2014; [cited 2018 Jan 10]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng.pdf?ua=1.
  • Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies; 2014; [cited 2018 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/TDHS_2013_main.report.pdf.
  • Birth and Cesarean Action Management Guideline. Ankara, Turkey: Public Health Institution of Turkey; 2010. Turk Health Minister; [accessed 2018 Mar 15] Available from: https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/a%C3%A7sap27.pdf.
  • Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gyneacology (TJOD-2010). Turkish Health Ministry and TJOD action plan to decrease cesarean section rate. Available from: http://www.tjod.org/saglik-bakanligi-tjod-sezaryen-oranlarini-azaltma-ortak-eylem-plani/
  • Atan SÜ, Duran ET, Kavlak O, et al. Spontaneous vaginal delivery or cesarean section? What do Turkish women think? Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19:1–7.
  • Deng W, Klemetti R, Long Q, et al. Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:285.
  • Canbal M, Yılmaz A. The standard of knowledge for cesarean section in women who applied to family medicine: two centered cross-sectional study. Dicle Med J. 2014;41:319–325.
  • Prenatal Care Management Guideline. Ankara, Turkey: Public Health Institution of Turkey; 2014. Turk Health Minister; [cited 2017 Mar 20]. Available from: http://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/dogumonubakim.pdf.
  • Özkan S, Sakal FN, Avcı E, et al. Kadınların doğum yöntemi tercihi ve ilişkili faktörler. Turk J Public Health. 2013;11:59–71.
  • Vatansever Z, Okumuş H. Gebelerin doğum şekline karar verme durumlarının incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Unv HYO ED. 2013;6:82–87.
  • Yıldız S, Caypınar SS, Cengiz H, et al. Awareness and perceptions of Turkish women towards delivery methods. J Clin Exp Investig. 2014;5:173–178.
  • Karabulutlu Ö. Kadınların doğum şekli tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler. İ.Ü.F.N. Haematol Derg. 2012;20:210–218.
  • Oner S, Kocas F. The prevalence of cesarean section among 18-49-year-old women living in Mersin province and affecting factors. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2016;15:401.
  • Kambale MJ. Social predictors of cesarean section births in Italy. Afr Health Sci. 2011;11:560–565.
  • Cesaroni G, Forastiere F, Perucci CA. Are cesarean deliveries more likely for poorly educated parents? A brief report from Italy. Birth. 2008;35:241–244.
  • Gözükara F, Eroğlu K. İlk doğumunu yapmış kadınların (primipar) doğum şekline yönelik tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler. Hacettepe Univ Saglik Bilim Fak Hemsire Derg. 2008;15:32–46.
  • Antenatal Care. Opportunities for Africa’s newborn. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2010; [cited 10 Mar 2018] Available from: http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/publications/oanfullreport.pdf.
  • Uzunçakmak C, Güldaş A, Aydın S, et al. Investigation of cesarean sections at Istanbul Training and Research Hospital obstetrics and gynecology department between 2005 and 2012. Istanbul Med J. 2013;14:112–116.
  • Phaloprakarn C, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S. Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes among Thai and other Southeast Asian pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42:936–943.
  • Chiossi G, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:561–569.
  • Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, et al. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD004667.
  • Shetty P. More midwives needed to improve maternal and newborn survival. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:804–805.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.