Structured clinical examinations in labor: rekindling the craft of obstetrics

References

• Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, et al. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:437–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis O, Ruimark S, Corinne D, et al. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:193–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, et al. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:258–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, et al. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:264–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahalka N, Sadan O, Malinger G, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:381–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:868–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsjø P, Koss KS. Interindividual variation in vaginal examination findings during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61:509–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oláh KS. Reversal of the decision for caesarean section in the second stage of labour on the basis of consultant vaginal assessment. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:115–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellussi F, Ghi T, Youssef A, et al. The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, et al. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG. 2014;121:1029–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric forceps. The College, Washington. (Committee Opinion No: 59); 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, et al. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:69.e1–69.e10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, et al. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:172–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar A, Sturrock S, Wallace EM, et al. Evaluation of learning from Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training and its impact on patient outcomes in Australia using Kirkpatrick’s framework: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e017451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone H, Crane J, Johnston K, et al. Retention of vaginal breech delivery skills taught in simulation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benediktsdottir S, Salvesen KÅ, Hjartardottir H, et al. Reproducibility and acceptability of ultrasound measurements of head-perineum distance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97:97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Contro E, Farina A, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:500–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KÅ, Eggebø TM. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:310–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham K, Phipps H, Hyett JA, et al. Persistent occiput posterior: OUTcomes following digital rotation: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54:268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramphul M, Kennelly MM, Burke G, et al. Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496. BJOG. 2015;122:558–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Fetal rotation during vacuum extractions for prolonged labor: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97:998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter J. Moulding of the foetal head; a compensatory mechanism. BJOG. 1946;53:212–218.
   Google Scholar
• Dennen EH. Forceps deliveries, etc. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: F A Davis Company; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr JMM. Operative midwifery. Tindall and Cox: Bailliere; 1908.
   Google Scholar