Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 34, 2021 - Issue 18
Submit an article Journal homepage
220
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Development and validation of a clinical score to predict the probability of successful procedure in women undergoing external cephalic version

Keerthana Ananda Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry, India
,
Anish Keepanasserila Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry, IndiaCorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-0382
ORCID Icon,
R. Amalab Department of Biostatistics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry, India
&
N. Sreekumaran Nairb Department of Biostatistics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry, India
Pages 2925-2931 | Received 01 Apr 2019, Accepted 27 Sep 2019, Published online: 07 Oct 2019

References

  • Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, et al. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):851–852.
  • Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383.
  • Rietberg CCT, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser G. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in the Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG. 2005;112(2):205–209.
  • Impey LWM, Murphy DJ, Griffiths M, et al., on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetriciansand Gynaecologists. External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation. BJOG. 2017;124:e178–e192.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 161: external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(2):e54–e61.
  • Leung TY, Lau TK, Lo KW, et al. A survey of pregnant women’s attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic version. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;40(3):253–259.
  • Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD000083.
  • Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(3):221–224.
  • Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):630.e1.
  • Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(1):76–84.
  • Velzel J, de Hundt M, Mulder FM, et al. Prediction models for successful external cephalic version: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;195:160–167.
  • Burgos J, Melchor JC, Pijoán JI, et al. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;112(1):48–51.
  • Burgos J, Cobos P, Rodriguez L, et al. Clinical score for the outcome of external cephalic version: a two-phase prospective study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(1):59–61.
  • Kok M, van der Steeg JW, van der Post JA, et al. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks. Amer J Perinatol. 2011;28(02):103–110.
  • Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Nelson C. External cephalic version: predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(5 Pt 1):783–786.
  • Wong WM, Lao TT, Liu KL. Predicting the success of external cephalic version with a scoring system. A prospective, two-phase study. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(3):201–206.
  • Lau TK, Lo KWK, Wan D, et al. Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. BJOG. 1997;104(7):798–802.
  • Newman RB, Peacock BS, VanDorsten JP, et al. Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(2):245–249; discussion 249–250.
  • Keepanasseril A, Anand K, Soundara Raghavan S. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(1):79–83.
  • De Hundt M, Vlemmix F, Kok M, et al. External validation of a prediction model for successful external cephalic version. Amer J Perinatol.. 2012;29(3):231–236.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.