312
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The impact of preimplantation genetic testing on prenatal diagnostic procedures

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 3066-3069 | Received 12 Mar 2019, Accepted 03 Oct 2019, Published online: 15 Oct 2019

References

  • Suskin BG, Sciscione AM, Teigen N, et al. Revisiting the challenges of training maternal fetal medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):777.e1–777.e4.
  • Norton ME, Rink BD. Changing indications for invasive testing in an era of improved screening. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40(1):56–66.
  • Williams J, 3rd, Rad S, Beauchamp S, et al. Utilization of noninvasive prenatal testing: impact on referrals for diagnostic testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):102.e1–102.e6.
  • Khalifeh A, Weiner S, Berghella V, et al. Trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis: effect of sequential screening and noninvasive prenatal testing. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;39(4):292–296.
  • Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5 Suppl):S136–S143.
  • Brezina PR, Kutteh WH, Bailey AP, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an excellent tool, but not perfect: a guide to counseling patients considering PGS. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):49–50.
  • Brezina PR, Kutteh WH. Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ. 2015;350(3):g7611.
  • Scott RT, Jr, Ferry K, Su J, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):870–875.
  • Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, et al. Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(5):451–463.
  • Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–1158.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening for fetal aneuploidy. ACOG Practice Bulletin no 163. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2016.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders. ACOG Practice Bulletin no 162. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2016.
  • Norton ME, Nakagawa S, Norem C, et al. Effects of changes in prenatal aneuploidy screening policies in an integrated health care system. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2, PART 1):265–271.
  • Friedenthal J, Maxwell SM, Tiegs AW, et al. Clinical error rates of next generation sequencing (NGS) compared to array comparative genomic hybridization (ACGH) in euploid blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):e297.
  • Maxwell SM, Colls P, Hodes-Wertz B, et al. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1414–1419.e5.
  • Saura R, Gauthier B, Taine L, et al. Operator experience and fetal loss rate in transabdominal CVS. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14(1):70–71.
  • Wijnberger LD, van der Schouw YT, Christiaens GC. Learning in medicine: chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(3):241–246.
  • Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, et al. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):16–26.
  • Bakker M, Birnie E, Robles de Medina P, et al. Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(5):599–606.
  • Zubair I, Marcotte MP, Weinstein L, et al. A novel amniocentesis model for learning stereotactic skills. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(3):846–848.
  • McWeeney DT, Schwendemann WD, Nitsche JF, et al. Transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling models to teach maternal-fetal medicine fellows. Am J Perinatol. 2012;29(7):497–502.
  • Blumenfeld YJ, Chueh J. Chorionic villus sampling: technique and training. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(2):146–151.
  • Tabor A, Vestergaard CH, Lidegaard Ø. Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(1):19–24.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.