Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 34, 2021 - Issue 20
Submit an article Journal homepage
244
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Antepartum ultrasound prediction of failed vacuum-assisted operative delivery: a prospective cohort study

Giuseppe Rizzoa Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Ospedale Cristo Re, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Roma, ItalyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5525-4353
ORCID Icon,
Cecilia Mattiolib Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Università Degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Re Roma, Italy
,
Ilenia Mappac Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sechenov University, Moskva, Russia
,
Viktoriya Bitsadzec Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sechenov University, Moskva, RussiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-1042
ORCID Icon,
Jamilya Khizroevac Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sechenov University, Moskva, Russia
,
Alexander Makatsariyac Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sechenov University, Moskva, RussiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-4633
ORCID Icon &
Francesco D’Antoniod Foggia University Hospital, Foggia, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-3354
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3323-3329 | Received 30 Aug 2019, Accepted 18 Oct 2019, Published online: 12 Nov 2019

References

  • Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e56–e65.
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. Green-top Guidelines No. 26, January. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_26.pdf; 2011.
  • Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Silberstein T, et al. Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med. 2001;46(9):819–824.
  • Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, et al. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(7):642–648.
  • Verhoeven CJ, Nuij C, Janssen-Rolf CR, et al. Predictors for failure of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;200:29–34.
  • Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S. Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18(2):129–134.
  • Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, et al. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):41–45.
  • Vacca A. The trouble with vacuum extraction. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;9(1):41–45.
  • Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1709–1714.
  • O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11(11):CD005455.
  • Ben-Haroush A, Melamed N, Kaplan B, et al. Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):308.e1–308.e5.
  • Gopalani S, Bennett K, Critchlow C. Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):896–902.
  • Kabiri D, Lipschuetz M, Cohen SM, et al. Vacuum extraction failure is associated with a large head circumference. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(20):3325–3330.
  • Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):69.e1–69.e10.
  • Bellussi F, Salsi G, Simonazzi G, et al. A simple sonographic finding is associated with a successful vacuum application: the fetal occiput or forehead sign. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019;1:148–155.
  • Rizzo G, Aiello E, Bosi C, et al. Fetal head circumference and subpubic angle are independent risk factors for unplanned cesarean and operative delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(8):1006–1011.
  • Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(2):233–239.
  • Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333–337.
  • Ghi T, Youssef A, Martelli F, et al. Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(4):511–515.
  • Rizzo G, Prefumo F, Ferrazzi E, et al. The effect of fetal sex on customized fetal growth charts. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(23):3768–3775.
  • Rizzo G, Aloisio F, Bacigalupi A, et al. Women’s compliance with ultrasound in labor: a prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1638903
  • Cheng YW, Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, et al. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(9):563–568.
  • Ghi T, Dall'Asta A, Suprani A, et al. Correlation between subpubic arch angle and mode of delivery in large-for-gestational-age fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(3):221–227.
  • Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(6):1027–1031.
  • Frudinger A, Halligan S, Spencer JA, et al. Influence of the subpubic arch angle on anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence following childbirth. BJOG. 2002;109(11):1207–1212.
  • Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, et al. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(4):442–446.
  • Albrich SB, Shek K, Krahn U, et al. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(4):496–500.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.